Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
Popular Search: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: VAT RATES :: empanelment :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: TDS :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: cpt :: form 3cd :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: VAT Audit :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: due date for vat payment
« News Headlines »
 India is moving towards a flawed GST
 ICAI to organise two-day international conference in Hyderabad
 Here's how to calculate tax payable on your capital gains
 Income Tax calculations for the financial year 2016-17
 CPE Events 17 October - 22 October 2016
 High Court raps I-T Department for wrong tax demand
  CBDT signs 5 advance pricing pacts with Indian taxpayers
 Finance ministry warns tax officials of action against GST protest
 Big changes for small units under GST
 Parliament’s winter session to begin on November 16 to expedite GST rollout
 Income-tax (27th Amendment) Rules, 2016 - 92/2016

Tax arbitration can work to the benefit of all
August, 06th 2007
In the past two decades, the ongoing process of the integration of national economies leading to globalisation, capital mobility and increased trade in services has lead to the evolution of cross-border tax challenges in several nations.
Models of tax competition in a flat and connected world are different than those necessary to ensure compliance in multiple jurisdictions dominated by cross-border flow of goods, business reorganisation and repatriation of profits. Further, as business models get sophisticated with respect to trade and flow capital, tax systems will have to evolve to necessarily deal with those changes.
Currently, disputes arising out of bilateral tax treaties are resolved through administrative and judicial appeal process and typically undergo the so called Mutual Agreement Procedure or MAP; within the confines of the treaties. As Indias dominance in trade, investments and commerce increases, coupled with new models of businesses, so would be our problems vis-a-vis cross-border tax issues. It would necessarily mean greater cost of administration for the government and enhanced compliance cost for the tax payers. This phenomenon coupled with time consuming and expensive judicial remedy should lead us to wonder why we have not debated upon alternate dispute resolution.
Internationally, the MAP experience has resulted in backlogs besides several unresolved cases. Many approaches were considered for supplementing the existing MAP mechanism and after deliberations recently, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries agreed to broaden the avenues available for resolution of tax disputes by introducing arbitrations in treaties, should other attempts to resolve disagreements fail.
Among others, the modification will potentially affect companies investing or trading outside of their home country. OECDs Committee on Fiscal Affairs has agreed to modify the OECD Model Tax Convention, which serves as a basis for negotiations, by including possibility of arbitration in cross-border disputes.
The European Commission Arbitration Convention is a flagship authority for the arbitration process on tax treaty disputes. Until recently, only transfer pricing disputes fell within its realm and its geographic scope was restricted to the EU territory. Within its framework, transfer pricing cases that remain unresolved for 2 years are referred to an advisory commission, charged with delivering its opinion on elimination of double taxation. Under the convention, an advisory commission is expected to deliver its opinion within 6 months. The competent authorities of the respective countries are required to take action within six months of the advisory commission opinion.
Countries outside the EU have commenced incorporating arbitration clauses to freshly negotiated tax treaties. Such arbitration clauses extend the competence of an arbitration board not only to cover transfer pricing disputes but to the entire scope of a tax treaty.
Recent notable example is that of the United States and Germany, who signed a protocol amending their 1989 treaty protocol. A mandatory binding arbitration process has been provided for settling certain issues that cannot be resolved through the MAP process. Further, the treaty provides for arbitration proceedings to speed up the resolution process, moderate the revenue authorities position, and assure eventual relief from double taxation. Under the provisions, issues relating to residence, permanent establishment, business profits, associated enterprises and royalties could be submitted to binding arbitration. These are precisely the issues India is continuing to grapple.
The arbitration panel comprises of three members: one each appointed by the competent authority and the two members appoint a third member. The third member cannot be a citizen of either treaty country and chairs the panel. The competent authority of each country has 90 days to submit a proposed resolution and a position paper and further 90 days to submit a reply. The panel must adopt the resolution of one of the two parties (a model referred to as baseball arbitration) within six months of the chairs appointment.
The panels determination is binding on the competent authorities, though the taxpayer has right to opt out of the process within 30 days. All parties to the proceeding must agree to terms of confidentiality and the panel is not expected to provide a rationale for its determination.
Most of the existing arbitration clauses in tax treaties provide that it is subject to mutual consent of the revenue authorities of both the states. Thus, it offers the possibility for an arbitration procedure in tax matters provided generally under the international law. Countries such as Netherlands have concluded treaties which allow referral to an arbitration board by either of the contracting nations
My experience in the past few years suggests that several cross-border tax disputes have arisen in India particularly with respect to transfer pricing and attribution of profits to permanent establishment of a foreign enterprise. The disputes have arisen partly due to the steep learning curve the tax administrators (and the tax payers) are experiencing and partly due to Indias insecure feeling of tax base erosion as an emerging economy advancing to developed economy. More issues are likely to arise and inconsistent principles are expected to evolve, particularly on transfer pricing and Permanent Establishment matters. It will take several years for issues to reach finality, besides the unproductive use of judiciarys time and expensive litigation process. The recent Morgan Stanley experience is a case in point. Tax experts are still grappling with key findings of the court. An issue that warrants debate is the need for India to consider tax arbitration for cross border tax disputes. In my view, the need to consider arbitration is a no-brainer.
The incorporation of arbitration provisions in Indian treaties would not mean surrender of fiscal sovereignty but would only act as a credible alternative to supplement existing provisions to seek efficient and effective resolution of tax disputes. It will go a long way to lend greater transparency and clarity to determination of tax liability of transnational corporations prevent double taxation, besides acting as a catalyst to attract enhanced FDI. In my view, the question should be how and when rather why. With India moving away from being merely an observer status country and closer to becoming a OECD member, arbitration seems as an inevitable option to seek speedy redressal to tax disputes.
Mukesh Butani
The author is a Partner with BMR & Associates and views expresses herein are personal.
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Software Work Flow Workflow Software Software Automation Workflow automation Software Design Workflow Design Business Work Flow Workflow automation tools

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions