Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
Popular Search: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: form 3cd :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: VAT RATES :: due date for vat payment :: TDS :: empanelment :: cpt :: VAT Audit :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4%
« News Headlines »
 CBDT releases Income Tax Return statistics for last two fiscals
 CBDT issues second round of Certificates of Appreciation to tax payers for their contribution towards Nation building
 FinMin looks at cut in corporation tax
 Draft Rules for prescribing the method of valuation of fair market value in respect of the trust or the institution-Chapter XII-EB of the Income-tax Act, 1961- reg.
 India is moving towards a flawed GST
 ICAI to organise two-day international conference in Hyderabad
 Here's how to calculate tax payable on your capital gains
 Income Tax calculations for the financial year 2016-17
 CPE Events 17 October - 22 October 2016
 High Court raps I-T Department for wrong tax demand
  CBDT signs 5 advance pricing pacts with Indian taxpayers

Salary paid abroad to attract income tax
August, 29th 2006
Multinational companies adopt a uniform policy in respect of their employees salaries. In many cases, employees are transferred from one country to another. Therefore, there has to be continuity and consistency in their remuneration, despite different local tax laws and social security regulations. In many cases, expatriate employees are paid a part of their remuneration outside India. But even the part of remuneration paid outside India, on which tax at source should be deducted, is taxable in India. Where the tax is not deducted at source, the consequences are as under:- The employer responsible for deducting the tax at source shall be liable to pay the amount short-deducted or not deducted, along with interest, under Section 201 of the Act. In addition to paying the short-deducted tax, the employer may also be liable to pay, by way of penalty, a sum equal to the amount of tax which it failed to deduct or pay to the government of India. In principle, the remuneration to expatriate employees for services rendered in India is acceptable as allowable deduction in computing the profits attributable to Indian operations. But no deduction will be permissible under Section 40 (A) (I) unless the tax is deducted at source and paid to the government. However, Section 273 B provides that no penalty shall be imposed for the failure to deduct the tax at source if it is proved that there was reasonable cause for the said failure. In the context of what is a reasonable cause, reference is invited to the Commissioner of Income-tax versus Itochu Corporation. M/s. Itouch Corporation, a company incorporated in Japan, had a liaison office in Delhi. Japanese employees working in the Delhi office were paid a part of their salary outside India. However, neither was the same reflected in the return, nor were the taxes deducted at source. After a notice was issued, the company filed revised computation for different periods showing the amount paid to the employees in Japan. The company also paid the amount which was short-deducted. Thereafter, proceedings under Section 271C of the Income-tax Act, 1961, came to be initiated and the assessing officer imposed a penalty on the company for the failure to deduct the tax at source. The tribunal deleted the penalty by observing: After examining the ratios of the various case laws, referred to above and the facts of this case, we are of the opinion that there was a reasonable cause for not deducting the tax at source on account of emoluments paid to the expatriate employees outside India and hence no penalty under section 271C is exigible by the alleged default. The decision of the tribunal was upheld by the Delhi High Court. The above principle was upheld in a recent case of Commissioner of Income-tax versus NHK Japan Broadcasting Corporation. A careful reading of the above cases will show that penalty leviable for non-deduction of tax at source can be avoided if the employer readily pays the tax, files a revised return and co-operates with the tax department. H P Agrawal
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Software Outsourcing Company Offshore Software Outsourcing Software Outsourcing Company India Offshore Outsourcing Company India Software BPO Software Business Process Outsourcing Software Outsourcing India Offsho

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions