1
ITEM NO.64 COURT NO.2 SECTION IV-A
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
MA NO(S). 1539-1540 OF 2018
IN
C.A. NO(S). 7381-7382/2016
LAKHAN LAL & ANR. PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
GENERAL MANAGER (R AND R) NARMADA
HYDRORELECTRIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION & ORS. RESPONDENT(S)
(FOR ADMISSION )
Date : 06-07-2018 These applications were called on for hearing
today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sanjay Parikh, Adv.
Ms. Sumita Hazarika, AOR
For Respondent(s) Mr. Purushaindra Kaurav, Adv. Gen. MP
Mr. Mishra Saurabh, AOR
Ms. Anuradha Mishra, Adv.
Mr. Varun Mohan, Adv.
Mr. Arpan Pawar, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
There is a dispute between the parties as to whether
full amount of compensation and the amount due on account
of Special Rehabilitation Grant (SRG) was paid and it is
only the SRG amount which has been deducted from the
payment made.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally signed by
VINOD LAKHINA
Date: 2018.07.06
20:13:06 IST
Reason:
2
While the learned counsel for the State submits that
the payment was made in the above terms, learned counsel
for the land-owners submits that the amount on account of
SRG was deducted from the amount of compensation and it is
the said deducted amount that has been paid.
As the consequences that will follow in either of
the situations may be different, the State is directed to
bring on record the precise manner in which compensation
and SRG was paid and deduction of SRG was made to enable
the Court to pass further orders in the matter.
List the applications on 20th July, 2018.
[VINOD LAKHINA] [ASHA SONI]
AR-cum-PS BRANCH OFFICER
|