Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Allahabad HC Orders GSTN to Modify Portal within 1 Month to Allow Appeals Even When Disputed Tax Shows Nil
 Statement Recorded By High Courts Can't Be Later Contradicted By Counsel : Supreme Court
 Karnataka High Court restrains Bengaluru-based Institute of Chartered Tax Practitioners India from enrolling candidates for its courses
 Attachment on Cash Credit of Assessee under GST Act: Delhi HC directs Bank to Comply Instructions to Vacate
 Income Tax Addition Made Towards Unsubstantiated Share Capital Is Eligible For Section 80-IC Deduction: Delhi High Court
 Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
 Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
 Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
 ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
 Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
 [Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court

India’s new proposal for transfer pricing secondary adjustments is welcome relief
July, 16th 2018

India’s Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) on 19 June proposed to amend India’s harsh transfer pricing secondary adjustment rules that apply in when the primary adjustment is made as a result of an advance pricing agreement (APA) or mutual agreement process (MAP).

The CBDT on 15 June 2017 issued new rules for transfer pricing secondary adjustments. These rules are designed to attribute income to the excess money in the hands of an associated enterprise following a primary transfer pricing adjustment and also require an actual allocation of funds consistent with that adjustment.

Under the 2017 rules, a time limit of 90 days was set for repatriation of excess money, which begins when the primary adjustments attains finality.

These rules established that if the primary adjustment was made as a consequence of an APA, the 90-day period would begin from the date of filing of the return. If the primary adjustment was a consequence of the MAP, the 90 days is reckoned from the income tax return due date.

Both rules were viewed as quite harsh to taxpayers as the interest on secondary adjustments was computed from a period before the APA agreement or before the MAP resolution.

The CBDT’s new proposal is designed to provide relief.

Under this proposal, for primary adjustments made as a consequence of an APA, the period of 90 days would instead begin from the date the APA has been entered into by the taxpayer.

For primary adjustments made as a consequence of a MAP, the period of 90 days begins from the date of giving effect by the assessing officer under rule 44H to the resolution arrived under the MAP.

These proposed changes provide a practical solution for interest computation for resolutions under APA and MAP.

The amendment would likely provide relief to MNEs operating in India who have obtained MAP or APA program to obtain certainty with respect to their transfer pricing positions in India.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2026 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting