Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Attachment on Cash Credit of Assessee under GST Act: Delhi HC directs Bank to Comply Instructions to Vacate
 Income Tax Addition Made Towards Unsubstantiated Share Capital Is Eligible For Section 80-IC Deduction: Delhi High Court

Kudrat Sandhu vs. UOI (Supreme Court)
July, 19th 2018

ITAT Appointment Rules: Persons selected as Member of the ITAT will continue till the age of 62 years and the person holding the post of President, shall continue till the age of 65 years

The Supreme Court had earlier directed that pending the outcome of the challenge, the appointment of Members of the ITAT will be for a period of five years or till the maximum age that was fixed under the old Act and Rules.

The Supreme Court has now clarified the situation as follows:

“At this juncture, we may note that there is some confusion with regard to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) as regards the age of superannuation.

We make it clear that the person selected as Member of the ITAT will continue till the age of 62 years and the person holding the post of President, shall continue till the age of 65 years.”

See also: Law Ministry Invites Applications For Appointment To Posts Of Judicial & Accountant Members In ITAT

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Writ Petition (Civil) No. 279/2017

KUDRAT SANDHU Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Respondent(s)

WITH

W.P.(C) No. 640/2017 (X)
W.P.(C) No. 925/2017 (PIL-W)
(FOR ADMISSION)
W.P.(C) No. 33/2018 (PIL-W)
(FOR APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS ON IA 65011/2018)
W.P.(C) No. 205/2018 (X)
W.P.(C) No. 467/2018 (X)
(FOR ADMISSION)

Date : 16-07-2018 This matter was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD

For Petitioner(s)

WP 33/2018 Mr. Sidharth Luthra, Sr. Adv.
Ms. Maneesha Dhir, Adv.
Mr. Karan Batura, Adv.
Mr. Ashu Kansal, Adv.
Ms. Anushree Prashit Kapadia, Adv.
WP 467/2018 Mr. Ashok Kumar Panda, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Satyabrata Panda, Adv.
Mr. Manoranjan Paikaray, Adv.
Mr. Aniruddha Purushotham, Adv.
Mr. Tejaswi Kumar Pradhan, AOR

WP 640/2017 Mr. A.K. Behera, Adv.
Mr. V.K. Verma, AOR
Ms. Priya Hingorani, Adv.
Mr. Naresh Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Kripa Shanker Prasad, Adv.

WP 205/2018 Ms. Palak Mahajan, Adv.
Ms. Diksha Rai, AOR
Ms. Rhea Dube, Adv.

WP 925/2017 Mr. Rupesh Kumar, AOR
Mr. Pravesh Bahuguna, Adv.
Mr. Prashant Rawat, Adv.

WP 279/2017 Mr. Arun Monga, Adv.
Ms. Divya Sharma, Adv.
Ms. Mayuri Raghuvanshi, AOR
Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, Adv.
Ms. Anushree Prashit Kapadia, AOR

Mr. K.K. Venugopal, AG
Mr. Maninder Singh, ASG
Mr. S.S. Shamshery, Adv.
Mr. R. Balasubramanian, Adv.
Ms. Rukmini Bobde, Adv.
Mr. Harish V. Shekhar, Adv.
Ms. Shraddha Deshmukh, Adv.
Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Rohit Bhat, Adv.
Mr. B.K. Prasad, Adv.
Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR
Mr. Ajay Bansal, Adv.
Mr. Gaurav Yadava, Adv.
Ms. Veena Bansal, Adv.
Mr. Ajayveer Singh Jain, Adv.
Mr. Uday Ram Bokadia, Adv.
Ms. Divya Garg, Adv.
Mr. Sonal Jain, AOR
Mr. Zoheb Hossain, AOR
Mr. Ashok Mathur, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

Mr. Sidharth Luthra, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner in W.P.(C) No. 33/2018 submits that certain positions in the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) have not yet been filled up though vacancies are there.

Mr. A.K. Behera, learned counsel for the petitioner in W.P.(C) No. 640/2017 submitted in respect of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) that though the matter has reached the final stage, yet the persons have not yet been appointed.

Mr. K.K. Venugopal, learned Attorney General for India assisted by Mr. R. Balasubramanian, learned counsel shall obtain instructions in this regard.

If any anomaly is there, it will be open to learned counsel to serve a copy of the same by way of a written statement to Mr. R. Balasubramanian, who in turn, may brief the learned Attorney General.

Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, learned counsel shall also submit a statement in writing as regards the Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT), a copy of which shall be served on Mr. R. Balasubramanian.

At this juncture, we may note that there is some confusion with regard to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) as regards the age of superannuation.

We make it clear that the person selected as Member of the ITAT will continue till the age of 62 years and the person holding the post of President, shall continue till the age of 65 years.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting