Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: TDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: form 3cd :: empanelment :: VAT Audit :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: cpt :: due date for vat payment :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: VAT RATES :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD
 
 
Transfer Pricing »
 HMRC steps up inquiries into cross-border deals by big business
 An Overview of Transfer Pricing in China
 South Africa: transfer pricing record-keeping rules finalized
 India among the top three nations where transfer pricing policies faced official examination: EY Survey
 Vietnam publishes draft transfer pricing law to combat tax avoidance
 New transfer pricing documentation rules and fiscal assessment procedure in Finland
 India, US resolve tax disputes worth Rs 5,000 crore via APA
 India, UK sign three Advance Pricing Agreements
  Foreign Exchange Management (Insurance) Regulations, 2015
 Why so many MNC offices are led by expats in India
 Govt looks to resolve 100 transfer pricing agreements by March next year

Transfer pricing in log exports is a good example of why forensic audits in the natural resources sector are urgently needed
July, 03rd 2015

In response to the letter ‘Where is the fraud?’ (Stabroek News, 26 June 2015), the following notes might help readers. Customs fraud has nothing to do with the ton-miles costs of moving forest products by road in Guyana or by Panamax ocean container ships. Customs fraud is when and where there is non-compliance with the Customs Act (cap. 82:01, especially sections 157, 158 and 216 (d) and (e)) and associated GRA procedures. The requirements are summarised in the Guyana Revenue Authority’s commercial/general-items – ‘Commercial Exports – General Items – OUTGOING CARGO’. Note that the webpage which the GRA provides for ‘Forestry products’ is blank. The GRA states that ‘Exporters must submit documents requesting examination of outgoing cargo along with Forms C 43, C 12 (a Form C 12 is only used when cargo is loaded on or off a sufferance wharf) and a letter requesting examination where applicable’. Note that GRA Form C 43 is also not available from the Forms section of the GRA website. The letter is presumably the unnumbered form ‘Notification for exports’, which requires the shipping agent or broker or owner to declare that ‘to the best of my knowledge the information on this form is true and correct’.

According to the same GRA webpage, ‘An examination of the cargo is then conducted by the Customs & Trade Administration (C&TA); after the examination is conducted, it is recorded on the Form C 72. Approval is then given for the goods to be loaded on the vessel in the presence of the Customs personnel and officials from the respective agencies; … The Contents slip, Shipping bill (this must be certified shipped before files are sent to Quality Review) and other documents relating to the cargo are compiled into a file and entered into an outgoing register and given a rotation number’.

Form C 72, the main Customs declaration form for import or export, likewise requires the shipping agent or broker or owner to ‘declare that the information and particulars mentioned herein are true and complete …’

Thus exporters must provide truthful information as to –

?who is the real owner of the products being exported?

?what are the real weights or volumes by category of product (such as logs of wamara timber)?

?what are the real FOB values of the products (Free-on-board = all taxes and charges have been paid, including ship loading costs)? Since 2010, FOB for containerised goods (such as Bai Shan Lin’s wamara logs exported to China) is more properly referenced as FCA (Free Carrier Incoterms).

Ownership – pretending that some small loggers’ association is exporting wamara logs to a named furniture factory or other buyer in China is probably a fraud, because the log trader has purchased the logs for cash at the roadside or in Georgetown before containerisation and the log trader is the real owner at the time of ship loading.

Volume – it is a fraud to pretend that the volumes of logs with 2 cm or more subtracted from their diameters and 20 cm or more subtracted from their lengths (a common practice of log traders) are correctly measured.

According to the GFC’s subsidiary Forest Products Development and Marketing Council’s market/export report for April 2015, the declared FOB/FCA values for purpleheart logs were in the range US$ 220-330/m3 and wamara logs were in the range 130-220/m3. According to the ITTO Tropical Timber Market report 19 (11) 1-15 June 2015 page 15, the CIF prices in the Guangzhou Yuzhu international timber market for purpleheart were US$ 500-530/m3 and for wamara US$ 760-900/m3.

The purpleheart and wamara logs had travelled in the same kinds of containers in the same ships from the same export port to the same import port. How were their CIF (cost, insurance and ocean freight) values so very different in China from those declared in Georgetown? China Customs are famous for being tough on accuracy of import documents and for the quality of their statistics. The Shipping Association of Guyana can confirm that insurance and ocean freight and unloading costs for Guyana-to-Guangzhou ocean shipping are nowhere near US$ 500/m3 (or US$ 10,000 per 40’ shipping container with 20 m3 of wamara logs).

The circumstantial evidence points directly towards fraud in Guyana, with the false information passed through the Guyana Forestry Commission and Guyana Revenue Authority approval processes.

The US-based Global Financial Integrity estimated Customs fraud for Guyana at US$84 million in 2003, rising almost continuously to US$440 million in 2012. Around half of the illicit flows (US$1,464 million for 2003-2012) were attributed to export under-invoicing (Global Financial Integrity 2014). The transfer pricing in purpleheart, wamara and other log exports is a very good example of why forensic audits in the natural resources sector are urgently needed. It is time for the forensic auditors to air out the pumpkin suits for the whole pack of thieves, the log traders, the brokers, and the GFC and GRA staff who are countersigning and approving these falsely declared shipments.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Software Development Software Programming Software Engineering Custom Software Development Requirement Based Software Development Software Solutions Software Serv

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions