Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: empanelment :: form 3cd :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: cpt :: VAT RATES :: VAT Audit :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: TDS :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: due date for vat payment :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT
 
 
ź From the Courts »
 Reliance Communications Ltd vs. DDIT (ITAT Mumbai)
  Sushila Devi vs. CIT (Delhi High Court)
 Ashok Prapann Sharma vs. CIT (Supreme Court)a
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
 M.K.Overseas Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Pr.Commissioner Of Income Tax-06
 Arshia Ahmed Qureshi Vs. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-21
 CHAUDHARY SKIN TRADING COMPANY Vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-21
  Sushila Devi vs. CIT (Delhi High Court)
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
 Deputy Director Of Income Tax Vs. Virage Logic International

M/s. Pratap Silicamet (P) Ltd., 101, Sewak Chamber I, 2099/38, Naiwala, Karol Bagh, New Delhi Vs. ITO, Ward 14(2), New Delhi
July, 23rd 2015
          IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
               (DELHI BENCH ` F', NEW DELHI)

           BEFORE SHRI I. C. SUDHIR, JUDICIAL MEMBER
           AND SHRI J. S. REDDY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
                         I.T.A. No.4808 /Del/2010
                        Assessment year : 2007-08
M/s. Pratap Silicamet (P) Ltd.,      Vs.         ITO, Ward 14(2),
101, Sewak Chamber I,                            New Delhi
2099/38, Naiwala, Karol Bagh,
New Delhi
GIR / PAN:AADCP3715D
          (Appellant)                      (Respondent)

                  Appellant by :     Shri R. S. Adlakha, Adv.
                  Respondent by :    Shri Vikram Sahay, Sr. DR

      Date of hearing       :        20.07.2015
      Date of pronouncement :        22.07.2015

                                     ORDER

PER J. S. REDDY, AM:

      This is an appeal filed by assessee directed against the order of Ld.
CIT(A) XVII, New Delhi dated 25.08.2010 for the Assessment Year 2007-
08 on the following grounds:
      "1. That having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case,
      Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in deciding the appeal of the
      assessee that too without giving adequate opportunity of hearing and
      without appreciating the facts and circumstances of the case.
      2.    That having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case,
      Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in confirming the action of
      Ld. AO in making addition of Rs.80,00,000/- on account of share
      capital received more so when the amount was received before the
      commencement of business of the assessee.
                                      2                ITA No.4808/Del/2010





      3.    That In any case and in any view of the matter, action of Ld.
      CTT(A) in confirming the action of Ld. AO in making the impugned
      addition is illegal and against the facts and circumstances of the case.
      4.    That having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case,
      Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in confirming the action of
      Ld. AO in making disallowance of Rs.18,05,500/- (i.e. 20% of
      90,27,500/-) on account of alleged cash payment U/S 40A(3) by
      recording incorrect facts and findings and without giving adequate
      opportunity of hearing.
      5.    That in any case and in any view of the matter, action of Ld.
      CIT(A) in confirming the action of Ld. AO in making the impugned
      addition is illegal and against the facts and circumstances of the case.
      6.    That having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case,
      Ld. CIT (A) has erred in law and on facts in confirming the action of
      Ld. AO making addition of Rs4,997/- being difference of preliminary
      expenses by treating it as capital expenditure.
      7.    That having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case,
      action of Ld. CIT(A) in confirming the action of Ld. A.O. in making
      the impugned
      additions/disallowances and in framing the impugned order which is
      unjustified, void ab initio and against the principles of natural justice
      and by recording incorrect facts and findings and without giving
      adequate opportunity of hearing and the same is not sustainable on
      various legal and factual grounds."

2.    The assessee is a company dealing in stock in shares. In the return of
income for the Assessment Year 2007-08 filed on 29.09.2007, the assessee
declared income of Rs.4,720/-. The A.O. completed assessment u/s 143(3)
determining total income of assessee at Rs.98,15,247/-.        Aggrieved, the
assessee carried the matter in appeal. The first appellate authority disposed
of the case ex-parte, for the reason that the assessee had not attended hearing
despite several notices. Aggrieved, assessee is in appeal before us.
3.    We have heard Ld. A.R. Shri R. S. Adlakha on behalf of assessee and
Ld. D.R. Shri Vikram Sahay on behalf of revenue. On a close perusal of the
                                       3                ITA No.4808/Del/2010





order of first appellate authority we observe that papers on record and
documentary evidence were not considered while adjudicating the case ex-
parte. The assessee has also not cooperated with the first appellate authority
in the appellate proceedings. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee demonstrated
before us, as to why the assessee could not appear before the Ld. CIT(A).
Under these circumstances, we are of the considered opinion that the ends of
justice will be met if the appeal is set aside to the file of first appellate
authority for fresh adjudication in accordance with law. The assessee shall
cooperate in disposing off the appeal with the first appellate authority. As
the earlier notices have not been responded to by the assessee, we direct the
assessee to present itself before the first appellate authority on 07.09.2015
and obtain notice of hearing and thereafter cooperate in the disposal of
appeal.
4.    In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
5.    Order pronounced in the open court on 22nd July 2015.




      Sd./-                                                 Sd./-
 ( I. C. SUDHIR)                                     (J. S. REDDY)
JUDICIAL MEMBER                                ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Date: 22nd July, 2015

Sp
Copy forwarded to:-
   1. The appellant
   2. The respondent
   3. The CIT
   4. The CIT (A)-, New Delhi.
   5. The DR, ITAT, Loknayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi.
True copy.
                                         4           ITA No.4808/Del/2010


                                                             By Order

                                                          (ITAT, New Delhi).


S.No.                    Details                Date     Initials   Designation
  1     Draft dictated on                         20/7               Sr. PS/PS
  2     Draft placed before author                21/7               Sr. PS/PS
        Draft proposed & placed before the
 3                                                                    JM/AM
        Second Member
        Draft discussed/approved by Second
 4                                                                   AM/AM
        Member
 5      Approved Draft comes to the Sr. PS/PS     22/7              Sr. PS/PS
 6      Kept for pronouncement                    22/7              Sr. PS/PS
 7      File sent to Bench Clerk                  23/7              Sr. PS/PS
        Date on which the file goes to Head
 8
        Clerk
 9      Date on which file goes to A.R.
 10     Date of Dispatch of order

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
SEO Services SEO LLC e-boost Search Engine Optimization Services Internet Marketing Services Website Placement Services On-site Webs

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions