|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
« Income Tax Officer -19(1)(1), Room No. 319, Piramal... | DCIT, Central Circle, Meerut Vs. Sh.Vipul Goyal, 579,... » |
M/s Agache Associates Ltd. C/o-M/s S.P.Jain and Associates, U-17 (LGF), Green Park Extn., New Delhi-110016 Vs. ITO, Company Ward-1(2), New Delhi |
|
July, 10th 2015 |
1 ITA No. 1036/Del/14
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
DELHI BENCH: `SMC' NEW DELHI
BEFORE SMT DIVA SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER
I.T.A .No.-1036/Del/2014
(ASSESSMENT YEAR-2005-06)
M/s Agache Associates Ltd. vs ITO,
C/o-M/s S.P.Jain and Associates, Company Ward-1(2),
U-17 (LGF), Green Park Extn., New Delhi
New Delhi-110016
PAN-AAACA9911H
(APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT)
Appellant by None
Respondent by Sh.Gagan Sood, Sr.DR
Date of Hearing 01.07.2015
Date of Pronouncement 08 .07.2015
ORDER
By the present appeal, the assessee assails the correctness of the order
dated 17.12.2013 passed by CIT(A)-IV, New Delhi pertaining to 2005-06
assessment year.
2. However, at the time of hearing when the appeal was called out, no one
was present on behalf of the assessee. The appeal was passed over twice
Despite the fact light till the end of the Board neither the assessee was present
nor any request for adjournment had been placed before us. Since in the third
round also the position remained the same. It was considereds that the
assessee may not be serious in pursuing the appeal filed. It is further seen
that the notice issued on 15.06.2015 sent to the assessee by speed post at the
address indicated in Column No-10 in the memo of appeal filed by the assessee
returned unserved with comment "left without address". Accordingly in the
2 ITA No. 1036/Del/14
absence of any representation on the part of the assessee seeking time etc.
right till the time of the hearing and in fact till the passing of this order, the
appeal is dismissed in limine. Support is drawn from the order of the Tribunal
in Commissioner of Income-Tax vs. Multi Plan India (P) Ltd.; 38 ITD 320 (Del)
and Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT: 223 ITR 480 (M.P).
3. Before parting it is appropriate to add that in case the assessee is able to
show that there was a reasonable cause for non-representation on the date of
hearing then it may if so advised pray for a recall of this order and decisions on
merits. The said order was pronounced on the date of hearing itself in the
open Court.
4. As a result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
The order is pronounced in the open court on 8th of July 2015.
Sd/-
(DIVA SINGH)
JUDICIAL MEMBER
Dated: 08/07/2015
*Amit Kumar/R. N*/Kavita
Copy forwarded to:
1. Appellant
2. Respondent
3. CIT
4. CIT(Appeals)
5. DR: ITAT
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
ITAT NEW DELHI
3 ITA No. 1036/Del/14
Date
1. Draft dictated on 01.07.2015 PS
2. Draft placed before author 01.07.2015 PS
3. Draft proposed & placed before the 08.07.2015 JM/AM
second member
4. Draft discussed/approved by Second 08.07.2015 JM/AM
Member.
5. Approved Draft comes to the 8.07.2015 PS/PS
Sr.PS/PS
6. Kept for pronouncement on 08.07.2015 PS
7. File sent to the Bench Clerk 8.07.2015 PS
8. Date on which file goes to the AR
9. Date on which file goes to the Head
Clerk.
10. Date of dispatch of Order.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting
|
|
|
|
|
|