Latest Expert Exchange Queries

Make your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
Popular Search: TDS :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: due date for vat payment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: VAT RATES :: form 3cd :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: cpt :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: empanelment :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: VAT Audit
From the Courts »
 Canyon Financial Services Ltd Vs. Income Tax Officer
 Chintels India Limited Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax – Circle 8
 Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs. International Tractors Ltd.
 Hcl Technologies Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle-2 & Anr.
 New Delhi Television Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
 John Fowler (India) Pvt. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
 CIT vs. The Mumbai Metropolitan Regional Iron and Steel Market Committee (Bombay High Court)
 KSS Petron Private Ltd vs. ACIT (Bombay High Court)
 JK Mittal & Co vs. UOI (No. 2) (Delhi High Court)
 Pr CIT vs. Shri Mahila Sewa Sahakari Bank Ltd (Gujarat High Court)
 Pr CIT Vs. PPC Business And Products Pvt Ltd (Delhi High Court)

Manju Kunchal, C/o. L. M. Agarwal & Co, Chartered Accountaant, KA-32, Kavi Nagar, Ghaziabad Vs. ITO, Ward-1(4), Ghaziabad
July, 20th 2015
                       DELHI BENCH `SMC-II', NEW DELHI

                                  ITA No. 5239/Del/2014
                                 Assessment Year: 1997-98

            Manju Kunchal,                Vs.    ITO,
            C/o. L. M. Agarwal & Co,             Ward-1(4),
            Chartered Accountant,                Ghaziabad
            KA-32, Kavi Nagar,
             (Appellant)                         (Respondent)

                  Appellant by  :       Sh. L.M. Agarwal, CA
                  Respondent by :       Sh. Manoj Kr. Chopra, Sr. DR

                               Date of Hearing    : 13.07.2015
                        Date of pronouncement     :   17.07.2015


      This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order dated 04.10.2013 of
Ld.CIT(A), Muzaffarnagar pertaining to the Assessment Year 1997-98 on the
following ground which reads as under:-

      "1.   That the Learned CIT (A) erred in Law as well as on fact by reject the
      appellant Ground No 1 "Regarding again addition of Rs. 160224/ - U/s 68 of I.
      Tax Act, as made by AO when all books of accounts was produced with
      evidence as per direction of 1TAT" Vide ITA No. 5022/DEL/03 dt 07/11/2 008.

      2. That the learned CIT (A) erred in Law as well as on fact by reject Ground
      No. 2 & 3 in spite of that all information and evidence has been place on
      records and copy of books of accounts also filed.

      3.  That in any case sustained of addition of Rs. 1,60,224/- is illegal and
      against ma terial available on the records. "

2.    This is the second round of appellate proceedings. The short point for
consideration is whether addition of Rs.1,60,224/- u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act,
1961 is sustainable. The assessee submits that these are not fresh credits, but only
repayments of amount due from the parties and these amounts are part of the
opening outstanding balances. An affidavit to that extent and copy of accounts have
been filed by the assessee. The AO has not produced any evidence to contradict the
                                                                            Page 2 of 2

submission of the assessee. No investigation or verification is done by the AO. There
is no evidence to disbelieve the affidavit and material evidence produced by the
assessee. Under these circumstances the addition in question cannot be sustained.
In the result the addition is deleted and the grounds raised by the assessee are
      Order pronounced in the Open Court on 17th July, 2015.


                                                  (J. SUDHAKAR REDDY)
                                                   ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

Dated:17th July, 2015

Copy forwarded to: -
1.    Appellant
2.    Respondent
3.    CIT
4.    CIT(A)
5.    DR, ITAT
                          TRUE COPY
                                                                        By Order,
                                                               ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
E-catalogue online catalogue E-brochure online brochure online product catalogue online product catalogue e-catalogue Indi

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions