Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Allahabad HC Orders GSTN to Modify Portal within 1 Month to Allow Appeals Even When Disputed Tax Shows Nil
 Statement Recorded By High Courts Can't Be Later Contradicted By Counsel : Supreme Court
 Karnataka High Court restrains Bengaluru-based Institute of Chartered Tax Practitioners India from enrolling candidates for its courses
 Attachment on Cash Credit of Assessee under GST Act: Delhi HC directs Bank to Comply Instructions to Vacate
 Income Tax Addition Made Towards Unsubstantiated Share Capital Is Eligible For Section 80-IC Deduction: Delhi High Court
 Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
 Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
 Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
 ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
 Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
 [Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court

Goodlays Creations Pvt.Ltd. C 38/3A, Lawrance Road Industrial Area Delhi 110 035 Vs. ITO Ward 12(2), C.R.bldg. New Delhi
July, 30th 2015
              IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                 DELHI BENCH `SMC-I', NEW DELHI


        BEFORE SHRI J. SUDHAKAR REDDY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

                          ITA No.731/Del/2014
                               AY: 2009-10

Goodlays Creations Pvt.Ltd.           vs.     ITO
C 38/3A, Lawrance Road                        Ward 12(2), C.R.bldg.
Industrial Area                               New Delhi
Delhi 110 035

PAN: AABCG 8086 G

(Appellant)                                             (Respondent)

                      Appellant by  : None
          Respondent by : Sh. Om Prakash Meena, Sr.D.R


                                  ORDER


      This is an appeal       filed by the assessee against the       order dt.

17.12.2012 of Ld.CIT(A)-XV, New Delhi         for Assessment Year 2009-10.

2.    On the date of hearing i.e. on 27th July,2015,     none appeared on

behalf of the assessee nor any adjournment application was received

despite issual of notice by RPAD.           Hence it is presumed      that the

assessee is not interested in prosecuting the appeal.






3.    Following the decisions     in the case of CIT vs. Multiplan India

P.Ltd. 38 ITD, 320 (Delhi), and the decision of the Hon'ble Bombay High

Court in the case of M/s Chemipol vs. UOI and others in Central Excise

Appeal No. 62/2009 judgement dt. 17th September,2009, I consider it a
                                                                       2


fit case for dismissing the appeals in limine, as not admitted. It is to

clarify that subsequently, if the assessee explains the reasons for non-

appearance and if the Bench is so satisfied, the matter may be recalled

for the purpose of adjudication of the appeal.






4.    In the result, the    appeal by the assessee stands dismissed for

non-prosecution.

      Order pronounced in the Open Court on 27th August,2015.


                                                 Sd/-

                                 (J.SUDHAKAR REDDY)
                                ACCOUNTANT MEMBER


Dated: the 27th August, 2015

*manga

Copy of the Order forwarded to:
 1.    Appellant;
 2.Respondent;
3.CIT;
 4.CIT(A);
5.DR;
 6.Guard File

                                                        By Order




                                                    Asst. Registrar

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2026 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting