Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link:
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Popular Search: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: VAT RATES :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: TDS :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: form 3cd :: due date for vat payment :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: VAT Audit :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: cpt :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: empanelment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
From the Courts »
 Abicor and Binzel Technoweld Pvt. Ltd vs. UOI (Bombay High Court)
 CST vs. Shri Krishna Chaitanya Enterprises (Bombay High Court)
 Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation (Gwalior) M.P. Ltd vs. CIT (Supreme Court)
 Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 Vs. Pavitra Commercial Ltd.
 Commissioner Of Income Tax Delhi Iv Vs. Gee Kay Finance & Leasing Co. Ltd.
 Pr.Commissioner Of Income Tax-6 Vs. Nokia Solutions & Network India Pvt Ltd (Formerly Known As, Nokia Siemens Network Pvt Ltd)
 SKY Light Hospitality Llp Vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle -28(1), New Delhi
 Tax outgo may rise for investors in companies undergoing M&A cases
 Rajat B Mehta vs. ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
 Seema Sabharwal vs. ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
  Vikram Singh vs. UOI (Delhi High Court)

DCIT, Circle 31 (1), New Delhi. Vs. Mr. Satinder Singh Chhabra, 1, Curzon Road, New Delhi.
July, 22nd 2015
                (DELHI BENCH `G' : NEW DELHI)


                          ITA No.1953/Del./2009
                      (ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2000-01)

DCIT, Circle 31 (1),             vs.         Mr. Satinder Singh Chhabra,
New Delhi.                                   1, Curzon Road,
                                             New Delhi.

                                             (PAN : ABJPS2010P)

       (APPELLANT)                                  (RESPONDENT)

                  ASSESSEE BY : Shri Sanat Kapoor, Advocate
                  REVENUE BY : Shri K.K. Jaswal, Senior DR

                      Date of Hearing       : 15.07.2015
                      Date of Pronouncement : 16.07.2015



       This appeal, at the instance of the revenue, is directed against the
order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-XXVI, New Delhi
dated 27.02.2009. The relevant assessment year is 2000-01. The appeal
has been filed on 11.05.2009.

2.     At the outset of the hearing, the ld. AR for the assessee submitted
that the tax effect on the deleted addition is less than the threshold limit,
i.e. Rs.4 lacs.
                                      2                 ITA No.1953/Del./2009

3.      On the other hand, ld. DR could not controvert the fact that the tax
effect is more than Rs.4 lakhs and fairly conceded that the tax effect in this
case is less than Rs.4 lakhs.
4.      We have heard rival submissions of the parties and perused the
entire material on record. As per recent CBDT Instruction no. 5/2014
dated 10.07.2014, the monetary limit for filing appeal by the department
before the ITAT has been revised to Rs. 4 lacs. Thus, the departmental
appeals, involving tax effect below Rs. 4 lacs, are not maintainable before
the ITAT.
4.1.    The Hon'ble Jurisdictional Delhi High Court in the case of CIT vs.
Delhi Race Club Ltd. in ITA No. 128/2008, order dated 03.03.2011, by
following the earlier order dated 02.08.2010 in ITA No. 179/1991 in the
case of CIT Delhi-III vs. M/s P.S. Jain & Co., has            held that such
instruction/ circular would also be applicable to pending cases.
4.2.    Admittedly the tax effect involved in the present appeal is below
Rs.4 lakhs. Therefore, in view of the revised instruction of the CBDT,
referred to above, and the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court's decision in
the case of Delhi Race Club Ltd., supra, the departmental appeal is not
5. In the result, appeal filed by the department is dismissed without going into the merits. Order pronounced in open court on this 16th day of July, 2015. Sd/- sd/- (J.S. REDDY) (A.T. VARKEY) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated the 16th day of July, 2015 TS 3 ITA No.1953/Del./2009 Copy forwarded to: 1.Appellant 2.Respondent 3.CIT 4.CIT(A)-XXVI, New Delhi. 5.CIT(ITAT), New Delhi. AR, ITAT NEW DELHI.
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Software Development Software Programming Software Engineering Custom Software Development Requirement Based Software Development Software Solutions Software Serv

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions