News shortcuts: From the Courts | Top Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | Professional Updates | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
From the Courts »
 M/s. Siomond Pharmaceuticals (P.) Ltd. 880/804B, Main Market, 3rd Floor, Rani Bagh New Delhi Vs. JCIT Range-77 New Delhi
 The ACIT, Central Circle-15, Room No.353, E-2, ARA Centre, Civic Centre, New Delhi. Vs. Mr. Rajesh Gupta, B-393, New Friends Colony, New Delhi
 National Crime Investigation Bureau, H.No. K-44, Second Floor, Kh. No.75/7, Amar Colony, Nangloi, Delhi Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), New Delhi
 Akg Securities & Consulting Ltd., 3776/309, Nirmal Market, Netaji Subhash Marg, Daryaganj, New Delhi Vs. Ito, Ward-1(1), New Delhi Room No. 380-A, C.R. Building, Ip Estate, New Delhi
  Administrator vs. Swarn Theater (Supreme Court)
 NRA Iron & Steel Pvt. Ltd vs. PCIT (Supreme Court) (Review Petition)
 Maruti Suzuki India Ltd vs. CIT (Supreme Court)
 How investing in NPS can help you save tax
 Barnala Steel Industries Ltd., Village Vehlana, Meerut Road, Muzaffarnagar. Vs. JCIT, Range-2, Muzaffarnagar.
 Athena Energy Venture Pvt. Ltd.,Second Floor, Vijaya Building, Vs. DCIT Circle – 2 (1) New Delhi
 Balwant Singh Bindra, Prop. M/s Bindra Tyres, Shop No.178, Janta Market, Rani Jhansi Road, Jhandewalan, New Delhi. Vs. ITO, Ward-63(4), New Delhi.

DCIT, Circle 15(1) C.R.Bldg., IP Estate New Delhi. Vs. M/s Roop Polymers Ltd., 2740/33, Hasan Building, 2nd Floor, Kashmere Gate, Delhi-110006
July, 08th 2015
ITA No. 4103/Del/2010
Asstt.Year: 2001-02

              IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                    DELHI BENCH `F', NEW DELHI

      BEFORE SHRI J. SUDHAKAR REDDY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
         AND SHRI C.M. GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER

                        ITA No. 4103/Del/2010
                        ASSTT. YEAR: 2001-02

DCIT, Circle 15(1)              vs.    M/s Roop Polymers Ltd.,
C.R.Bldg., IP Estate                   2740/33, Hasan Building, 2nd Floor,
New Delhi.                             Kashmere Gate, Delhi-110006
                                       (PAN: AAACR5365C)

(Appellant)                            (Respondent)

          Appellant by : Sh. Vikram Sahay, Sr. D.R.
          Respondent by : Shri Chander Shekhar, CA

                                      ORDER


PER CHANDRAMOHAN GARG, MEMBER


      This appeal is filed by the Revenue against the order dated 03.05.2010

of Ld.CIT(A)-XVIII, New Delhi pertaining to the Assessment Year 2001-02.







2.    We have heard arguments of both the sides and carefully perused the

relevant material placed on record.         Ld. Counsel of the assessee placed

calculation of tax effect and submitted that total tax effect in this case is less

than Rs. 4 lakh and in view of the recent Instruction No.5/2014 issued by CBDT

on 10.7.2014 revising the limitation for filing of appeal before ITAT fixing the

tax effect limit at Rs. 4 lakh, the appeal of the revenue is not maintainable and


                                        1
ITA No. 4103/Del/2010
Asstt.Year: 2001-02

liable to be dismissed in limine. On specific query from the Bench, ld. DR

fairly accepted that total tax effect in this appeal is less than Rs. 4 lakh.


3.    Ld. Counsel of the assessee placing reliance on the recent decision of CIT

vs M/s P.S. Jain and Co. Dated 2.8.2010 in ITR 179/1991 submitted that the

recent Board Instruction revising the monetary limit to Rs. 4 lakh for filing the

appeal before the ITAT on income tax matters is very much applicable to the

old references which are still pending undecided before the Tribunal. Ld. DR

fairly accepted that the Board Instruction No. 5/2014 issued by CBDT on

10.7.2014 is applicable to the present case.






4.    In view of above noted submissions of both the sides, we are inclined to

hold that there is no justification to proceed with the cases having tax effect of

less than Rs. 4 lakh. In view of above, respectfully following the decision of

Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court of Delhi in the case of CIT vs M/s P.S. Jain

& Co. (supra), we hold that this being a low tax effect case, the appeal of the

revenue deserves to be dismissed and we dismiss the same in limine without

going into merits.


5.    In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed.




                                           2
ITA No. 4103/Del/2010
Asstt.Year: 2001-02

        Order pronounced in the open court on 07/07/2015.


    Sd/-                                          Sd/-


( J.S. REDDY )                             (CHANDRAMOHAN GARG)
ACCOUNTANT MEMBER                             JUDICIAL MEMBER

DT. 07th JULY 2015
`GS'


Copy forwarded to:-

   1.   Appellant
   2.   Respondent
   3.   CIT(A)
   4.   CIT
   5.   DR



                                            By Order



                                            Asstt. Registrar




                                       3

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2020 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting