Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
 Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
 Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
 ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
 Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
 [Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court
 Rajasthan High Court directs GST Authority to Unblock Input Tax Credit availed in Electronic Credit Ledger
 Sebi-taxman fight over service tax dues reaches Supreme Court
 Delhi High Court Seeks Status Report from Centre for Appointments of Chairperson & Members in Adjudicating Authority Under PMLA
 Delhi High Court allows Income Tax Exemption to Charitable Society running Printing Press and uses Profit so generated for Charitable Purposes
 ITAT accepts Lease Income as Business Income as Business Investments were mostly in nature of Properties

M/s. Anushakti Chemicals & Drugs Ltd., (Formerly known as Aarti Healthcare Ltd.), 2nd Floor, Udyog Kshetra, Mulund Goregaon Link Road, Mumbai-400 080 Vs. The ITO, Range-10(3)(1), Mumbai
July, 30th 2014
                   ,  Û `'  

     IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL " A" BENCH, MUMBAI

      [^ . , Ú¢  ,  Û]   ãá,    ¢

            BEFORE SHRI D.MANMOHAN, VICE PRESIDENT AND

                SHRI N.K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

                ./I.T.A. No.9240/Mum/2010
            ( [ [ / Assessment Year :2007-08
 M/s. Anushakti Chemicals / The ITO, Range-10(3)(1),
& Drugs Ltd.,                  Mumbai
                           Vs.
(Formerly known as Aarti
Healthcare Ltd.),
2 nd Floor,
Udyog Kshetra,
Mulund Goregaon Link
Road,
Mumbai-400 080
    . /   . / PAN/GIR No. : AAACA 3517H
      ( /Appellant)       ..      (× / Respondent)
         / Appellant by:                      Shri Govind Javeri
       ×   /Respondent by:                    Shri Maurya Pratap


               / Date of Hearing                          :15.07.2014
               /Date of Pronouncement :15.07.2014

                               / O R D E R

PER N.K. BILLAIYA, AM:

        This appeal by the assessee is preferred against the order of the
Ld. CIT(A)-22, Mumbai dt.29.10.2010 pertaining to A.Y. 2007-08.

2.      The grievances of the assessee read as under:
                                     2                    ITA No. 9240/M/2010







             "1.   Treatment of Income from Manufacturing services as
                   income from other sources amounting to Rs.
                   1,74,33,189/-.

             2.    Treatment of lease rental as income from other
                   sources- Rs. 3,60,00,000/-

             3.    Treatment of other income amounting to Rs.
                   10,12,937/- as income from other sources.

             4.    Disallowance of deduction u/s. 35(1)(iv) of Rs.
                   15,31,784/-"

3.     At the very outset, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee stated that the
issues involved in the present appeal are squarely covered by the decision
of the Tribunal in assessee's own case for assessment year 2006-07.

4.     The Ld. Departmental Representative fairly conceded to this.

5.     We have carefully perused the orders of the authorities below. We
have also the benefit of the order of the Tribunal in assessee's own case
for A.Y. 2006-07 in ITA No. 9039/Mum/2010. We find that the Ld.
CIT(A) while deciding the appeal has followed the findings given in A.Y.
2006-07.

5.1.   A perusal of the order of the Tribunal for A.Y. 2006-07 shows that
ground No. 5 of that appeal is ground No. 1 of the present appeal.
Ground No. 6 of that appeal is ground No. 2 of the present appeal and
ground No. 4 of that appeal is ground No. 4 of the present appeal.
Grievances raised vide ground No. 3 of the present appeal has not been
discussed at all by the AO. We find that all the grounds in the present
appeal are in a way inter-linked consequent to the treatment given to the
receipt of manufacturing services income as "income from other sources"
and not a business income. We find that in Tribunal in A.Y. 2006-07 at
                                     3                     ITA No. 9240/M/2010







para-7 has set aside the issue to the file of the AO for examination of the
facts and contentions afresh and to decide accordingly.             As no
distinguishing facts have been brought before us, respectfully following
the findings of the Co ordinate Bench in ITA No. 9039/M/2010(supra),
we set aside the issue to the file of the AO. The AO is directed to decide
the issue afresh in the light of the findings given as per the directions of
the Tribunal for A.Y. 2006-07.

6.    In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for
statistical purpose.

      Order pronounced in the open court at the time of hearing on 15th
July, 2014.

          Sd/-                                         Sd/-
      (D.MANMOHAN )                            (N.K. BILLAIYA)
Ú¢/VICE PRESIDENT                      / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
 Mumbai;  Dated : 15.07.2014
.../ RJ , Sr. PS
    /Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1.  / The Appellant
2.   × / The Respondent.
3.    () / The CIT(A)-
4.     / CIT
5.    ,   , 
     / DR, ITAT, Mumbai
6.   [  / Guard file.
                                                 / BY ORDER,
              ×  //True Copy//
                                                    / 
                                                 (Dy./Asstt. Registrar)

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting