Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Allahabad HC Orders GSTN to Modify Portal within 1 Month to Allow Appeals Even When Disputed Tax Shows Nil
 Statement Recorded By High Courts Can't Be Later Contradicted By Counsel : Supreme Court
 Karnataka High Court restrains Bengaluru-based Institute of Chartered Tax Practitioners India from enrolling candidates for its courses
 Attachment on Cash Credit of Assessee under GST Act: Delhi HC directs Bank to Comply Instructions to Vacate
 Income Tax Addition Made Towards Unsubstantiated Share Capital Is Eligible For Section 80-IC Deduction: Delhi High Court
 Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
 Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
 Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
 ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
 Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
 [Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court

M&A deals, de-mergers not to attract related party provision in new company law
July, 22nd 2014

Mergers and acquisitions transactions have been excluded from the ambit of related party transactions (RPT) provision in the new company law. A clarification to this effect has now been issued by the Corporate Affairs Ministry.

This move could bring some cheer to corporates as it brings down the compliance burden for them.

Prior to this, it was unclear whether related party provision (Section 188) in the new company law also applied to transactions arising out of compromises, arrangements, and amalgamations that are dealt with under the specific provisions of the Companies Act 1956. The MCA has clarified that such transactions — compromises, arrangements and amalgamations — will not attract the requirements of Section 188 of the Act.

“They (Corporate Affairs Ministry) have done the right thing, but in a wrong manner. The company law itself should be amended rather than issuing a circular”, Dolphy D Souza, Senior Partner, SR Batliboi & Co told Business Line.

He, however, added that there could be some misuse of this relief. Sai Venkateshwaran, Partner and Head of Accounting Advisory Services, KPMG in India said that the move to exclude amalgamations, demergers and other such arrangements from the scope of related party transactions is welcome.

This is because all such transactions are already subjected to specific approvals from the shareholders and the Court before they are effective. Subjecting them to related party provision (Section 188) would have led to an additional procedural burden, he added.

Lalit Kumar, Partner, J Sagar Associates, a law firm, said there could now be an amalgamation between a holding company and a subsidiary (both related parties) without the transaction getting covered under the related party provision (Section 188) of the new company law.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2026 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting