""   
    IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL "B" BENCH, MUMBAI

    ,     . .  . . ,                                                ,                
     BEFORE SHRI SANJAY ARORA, AM AND DR. S. T. M. PAVALAN, JM

                     ./I.T.A. No. 2885/Mum/2011
                    (   / Assessment Year: 2003-04)

Bharat Infrastructure & Engineering Ltd.             Dy. CIT, Central Circle-23,
101, Shree Amba Shanti Chambers,                     Aaykar Bhavan, M. K. Road,
Opp. Hotel Leela, Andheri-Kurla Road,      /         Mumbai
Andheri (E), Mumbai-400 059                Vs.


     . /  . /PAN/GIR No. AABCB 3630 P
         ( /Appellant)                          :          (      / Respondent)

        / Appellant by                      :       Shri Vijay Mehta

           /Respondent by                   :       Shri Preetam Singh


                         /                  :       14.07.2014
                   Date of Hearing
                      /
                                            :       14.07.2014
           Date of Pronouncement

                                    / O R D E R
Per Sanjay Arora, A. M.:

       This is an Appeal by the Assessee directed against the Order by the Commissioner
of Income Tax (Appeals)-40, Mumbai (`CIT(A)' for short) dated 25.01.2011, partly
allowing the assessee's appeal contesting its assessment u/s.153A r/w s. 143(3) of the
Income Tax Act, 1961 (`the Act' hereinafter) for the assessment year (A.Y.) 2003-04
vide order dated 15.12.2009.
                                             2
                                                          ITA No. 2885/Mum/2011 (A.Y. 2003-04)
                                             Bharat Infrastructure & Engineering Ltd. vs. Dy. CIT






2.    At the very outset, it was submitted by the ld. Authorized Representative (AR), the
assessee's counsel, that the assessee wishes to withdraw its' instant appeal. The ld.
Departmental Representative (DR) did not raise any objection to the said proposition by
the assessee, on an enquiry in its respect by the Bench. We, accordingly, have no
hesitation in allowing the assessee's prayer. The assessee's appeal is, accordingly,
dismissed as withdrawn. We decide accordingly.






3.    In the result, the assessee's appeal is dismissed in limine.
                 Order pronounced in the open court on July 14, 2014

              Sd/-                                      Sd/-
      (Dr. S. T. M. Pavalan)                        (Sanjay Arora)
         / Judicial Member                            / Accountant Member

  Mumbai;  Dated : 14.07.2014


. ../Roshani, Sr. PS

         /Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1.  / The Appellant
2.  / The Respondent
3.     () / The CIT(A)
4.      / CIT - concerned
5.                ,     ,  / DR, ITAT, Mumbai
6.     / Guard File
                                                     / BY ORDER,



                                              /  (Dy./Asstt. Registrar)
                                          ,  / ITAT, Mumbai