Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Karnataka High Court restrains Bengaluru-based Institute of Chartered Tax Practitioners India from enrolling candidates for its courses
 Attachment on Cash Credit of Assessee under GST Act: Delhi HC directs Bank to Comply Instructions to Vacate
 Income Tax Addition Made Towards Unsubstantiated Share Capital Is Eligible For Section 80-IC Deduction: Delhi High Court
 Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
 Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
 Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
 ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
 Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
 [Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court
 Rajasthan High Court directs GST Authority to Unblock Input Tax Credit availed in Electronic Credit Ledger
 Sebi-taxman fight over service tax dues reaches Supreme Court

Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 3(3) Room No.609, 6 th Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road, Mumbai - 400020 Vs. M/s. Wham Investments Pvt. Ltd., 78A & 78B, Jolly Maker Chamber No.2, 7th Floor, Nariman Point,Mumbai 400 021
July, 30th 2014
                IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,
                       MUMBAI BENCH "G", MUMBAI

         BEFORE SHRI R.C. SHARMA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND
                SHRI SANJAY GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER

                                ITA No.2090/M/2012
                              Assessment Year: 2007-08

        Asstt. Commissioner of Income     M/s. Wham Investments Pvt.
        Tax,                              Ltd.,
        Circle ­ 3(3)                     78A & 78B, Jolly Maker
                                      Vs.
        Room No.609, 6th Floor,           Chamber No.2,
        Aayakar Bhavan,                   7th Floor, Nariman Point,
        M.K. Road,                        Mumbai ­ 400 021
        Mumbai - 400020                   PAN: AAACW0522E
              (Appellant)                     (Respondent)

      Assessee by                 : Shri M. Subramanian, A.R.
      Revenue by                  : Shri B. Yadagiri, D.R.

      Date of Hearing             : 24.07.2014
      Date of Pronouncement       : 24.07.2014

                                    ORDER

Per Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member:

      The present appeal has been filed by the Revenue against the order of
the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [hereinafter referred to as the
CIT(A)] dated 05.12.2011 relevant to assessment year 2007-08.






2.    The dispute involved in the present case is as to whether the income
earned by the assessee from the sale of shares is to be treated as business
income or income free capital gains.

3.    Before us, learned AR of the assessee relying upon the Instruction
No.3/2011 dated 09-02-2011 submitted that the tax effect in the appeal of the
Revenue is less than Rs.3 lacs, therefore, the appeal of the Revenue is not
maintainable.
                                              2                        ITA No.2090/M/2012
                                                              M/s. Wham Investments Pvt. Ltd.


4.       Learned DR did not controvert to the submission made by the learned
AR.






5. After hearing the learned representatives of both the parties, we find that as
per CBDT Instruction no.3 of 2011, dated 9th February 2011, the appeal before
the Appellate Tribunal can be filed by the Revenue, when the tax effect
exceeds the monetary limit of Rs.3,00,000/-. Therefore the appeal of the
Revenue is dismissed under section 268A of the income Tax Act.


6.       In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.




                  Order pronounced in the open court on 24.07.2014.



          Sd/-                                                   Sd/-
    (R.C. Sharma)                                           (Sanjay Garg)
ACCOUNTANT MEMBER                                       JUDICIAL MEMBER

Mumbai, Dated: 24.07.2014.
* Kishore, Sr. P.S.

Copy to: The Appellant
        The Respondent
        The CIT, Concerned, Mumbai
        The CIT (A) Concerned, Mumbai
        The DR Concerned Bench
//True Copy//                             [




                                                  By Order



                                 Dy/Asstt. Registrar, ITAT, Mumbai.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2025 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting