Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link: https://ims.go2customer.com
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft info@binarysoft.com
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: VAT RATES :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: TDS :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: cpt :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: empanelment :: VAT Audit :: form 3cd :: due date for vat payment
 
 
From the Courts »
 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-21 Vs. Dr. Vandana Gupta
 Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs. M/S Prasidh Leasing Ltd.
  CST vs. Shri Krishna Chaitanya Enterprises (Bombay High Court)
 Danisco India Private Ltd vs. UOI (Delhi High Court)
  Rashtriya Chemicals & Fertilizers Limited vs. CIT (ITAT Mumbai)
 M/S Abhipra Capital Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax (Investigation)
 Rashtriya Chemicals & Fertilizers Limited vs. CIT (ITAT Mumbai)
  Abicor and Binzel Technoweld Pvt. Ltd vs. UOI (Bombay High Court)
 Abicor and Binzel Technoweld Pvt. Ltd vs. UOI (Bombay High Court)
 CST vs. Shri Krishna Chaitanya Enterprises (Bombay High Court)
 Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation (Gwalior) M.P. Ltd vs. CIT (Supreme Court)

Akhilesh Manglik, B-5, Industrial Estate, Dehradun (Uttarakhand) Vs Income-tax Officer, Ward 2(1) Dehradun (Uttarakhand)
July, 22nd 2014
           IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                 DELHI BENCH `A', NEW DELHI
     Before Sh. J. S. Reddy, AM And Sh. George George K., JM
             ITA No. 4117/Del/2011 : Asstt. Year : 2000-01
Akhilesh Manglik,                  Vs    Income-tax Officer, Ward ­ 2(1)
B-5, Industrial Estate,                  Dehradun (Uttarakhand)
Dehradun (Uttarakhand)
(APPELLANT)                              (RESPONDENT)

            ITA No. 3968/Del/2011 : Asstt. Year : 2000-01
Income-tax Officer, Ward ­ 2(1)    Vs    Akhilesh Manglik,
Dehradun (Uttarakhand)                   B-5, Industrial Estate,
                                         Dehradun (Uttarakhand)
(APPELLANT)                              (RESPONDENT)
PAN No. ABNPM2826Q

                 Assessee by : Sh. Piyush Kaushik, Adv.
                 Revenue by : Sh. A. Mishra, CIT DR

Date of Hearing : 15.7.2014        Date of Pronouncement : 18.7.2014
                                  ORDER
Per George George K., JM:

       These are cross appeals filed against the order of CIT(A) dated
2.6.2011, pertaining to assessment year 2000-01.

2.     At the time of hearing of the assessee's appeal (ITA No.
4117/2011), the ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that he is
withdrawing the appeal. An endorsement to that effect has been recorded
in the order sheet. Accordingly, the assessee's appeal is dismissed as
withdrawn.
                                        2                  ITA No. 4117 & 3968/Del/2011
                                                                       Akhilesh Manglik






3.   In the Revenue's appeal the grounds raised reads as under:-
     "1. That the ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in issuing
     directions to verify whether the amount in question has been offered to
     tax in hands of any of the entities on whom the survey operations were
     carried out.
     2. That the ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in not deciding the
     issue either in favour of the assessee or in rejecting the appeal of the
     assessee on the basis of material available on record.
     3. The order of ld. CIT(A) be set aside and that of A.O be restored."

4.   From the above grounds, the Revenue has not made out any
grievance against the order of the CIT(A). The ld. DR also did not point
out any specific grievance, as against the order of the CIT(A). Moreover,
the ld. Counsel for the assessee, submitted that in view of the revised
monetary limit issued by the Board instructions dated 10.7.2014 (CBDT
Instructions No. 5/2014), the tax effect in this case would be below the
monetary limit prescribed by the Board. It was further submitted that in
view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court in the
case of Commissioner of Income Tax Vs M/s P. S. Jain and Company
(ITR 179/1991 judgment dated 2.8.2010), the revised Board Circular are
applicable to the pending cases.




5.   After hearing rival contentions, we are of the view that since
Revenue has not been able to point out any specific grievance in their
appeal, the Revenue's appeal is to be dismissed and we accordingly
dismiss the same.
                                               3                   ITA No. 4117 & 3968/Del/2011
                                                                               Akhilesh Manglik

6.      In the result, both assessee's and Revenue's appeal are dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 18/7/2014



                     Sd/-                                                  Sd/-
    (J. S. Reddy)                                                (George George K.)
ACCOUNTANT MEMBER                                               JUDICIAL MEMBER
Dated: 18/7/2014
*Subodh*
Copy forwarded to:
1. Appellant
2. Respondent
3. CIT
4. CIT(Appeals)
5.DR: ITAT
                                                                ASSISTANT REGISTRAR




                                                        Date    Initial
1.     Draft dictated on                            15.7.2014              PS
2.     Draft placed before author                   15.7.2014              PS
3.     Draft proposed & placed before the                                  JM/AM
       second member
4.     Draft discussed/approved by Second                                  JM/AM
       Member.
5.     Approved Draft comes to the Sr.PS/PS                                PS/PS
6.     Kept for pronouncement on                                           PS
7.     File sent to the Bench Clerk                                        PS
8.     Date on which file goes to the AR
9.     Date on which file goes to the Head Clerk.
10.    Date of dispatch of Order.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
System Testing Solution Manual Software Testing Solutions Automation Software Testing Solutions System Workflow Testing System Manual Testing

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions