Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: cpt :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: empanelment :: due date for vat payment :: VAT RATES :: TDS :: form 3cd :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: VAT Audit :: articles on VAT and GST in India
 
 
From the Courts »
 Ravneet Takhar Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax Ix And Ors.
 Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax
 Formula One World Championship Limited Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax, International Taxation-3 And Anr.
 Commissioner Of Income Tax International Taxation-3 Delhi Vs. Formula One World Championship Ltd. And Anr.
 Reliance Communications Ltd vs. DDIT (ITAT Mumbai)
  Sushila Devi vs. CIT (Delhi High Court)
 Ashok Prapann Sharma vs. CIT (Supreme Court)a
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
 M.K.Overseas Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Pr.Commissioner Of Income Tax-06
 Arshia Ahmed Qureshi Vs. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-21

ACIT, Circle-24(1), Room No.-238-B, 2nd Floor, C.R. Building, I.P.Estate, New Delhi. Vs Ful Kant Jha, 13, Hauz Khas, New Delhi
July, 24th 2014
                 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                       DELHI BENCH: `B' NEW DELHI

                BEFORE SMT DIVA SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER
                                  AND
                 SHRI T.S.KAPOOR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

                             I.T.A .No.-396/Del/2010
                         (ASSESSMENT YEAR-2003-04)

              ACIT,                         vs     Ful Kant Jha,
              Circle-24(1), Room No.-238-B,        13, Hauz Khas,
              2nd Floor, C.R. Building,            New Delhi
              I.P.Estate, New Delhi.               PAN-AAGPJ1888D
               (APPELLANT)                         (RESPONDENT)

                    Appellant by:      Sh. Vivek Kumar, Sr. DR
                    Respondent by:     Sh.S.K.Arora, Adv.

                                       ORDER
PER DIVA SINGH, JM

        This is an appeal filed by the Revenue against the order dated 10.11.2009 of
CIT(A)-XXIII, New Delhi pertaining to 2003-04 assessment year assailing the
action of the CIT(A) in quashing the penalty imposed u/s 271(1)(c). It was a
common stand of the parties before the Bench that the additions on the basis of
which penalty has been imposed by the AO by virtue of the order of the ITAT
stood partly modified and restored back to the AO vide order dated 23.08.2013 in
ITA No-2797/Del/2008, copy of which is placed at pages 48 to 55 of the paper
book.     Pointing to the same vis-à-vis the penalty order u/s 271(1)(c) dated
06.08.2009 it was submitted that penalty on account of the following four additions
was imposed:-
(1) Wrong claim of the interest income (2) Disallowance out of the business promotion expenses 2 I.T.A .No.-396/Del/2010 (3) Wrong claim of deduction u/s 80HHC on incentive from Tea Board (4) Wrong claim of deduction u/s 80-G 2. Referring to the above additions it was pointed out that whereas qua the second addition made on account of disallowance of promotion business expenses, part relief has been granted to the assessee in the quantum proceedings as such the same stood modified. The remaining three additions addressed at serial No-1, 3 & 4 have been restored to the AO for adjudication afresh. In the afore-mentioned peculiar facts and circumstances since the quantum order stood varied the very basis of the penalty order has no legs to stand on. In the circumstances, we are of the view that there is no purpose in dwelling on the merits and demerits of the departmental's appeal. Cause of action if any may arise when the final quantum order is passed pursuant to the direction of the ITAT. In view of the above the department's appeal is dismissed. The said order was pronounced in the open Court in the presence of the parties itself on the date if hearing itself. 3. In the result the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed. The order is pronounced in the open court on 11th of July 2014. Sd/- Sd/- (T.S.KAPOOR) (DIVA SINGH) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated:-11/07/2014 *Amit Kumar* Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(Appeals) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT NEW DELHI
 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Internet Marketing Website Marketing Internet Promotion Internet Marketing India Website Marketing India Internet Promotion India Internet Marketing Consultancy Website Marketing Consulta

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions