Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: empanelment :: cpt :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: TDS :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: due date for vat payment :: form 3cd :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: VAT RATES :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: VAT Audit :: list of goods taxed at 4%
 
 
General »
  Withdrawal of Legal Tender Character of the existing Bank Notes in the denominations of ₹ 500/- and ₹ 1000/- (Updated as on November 30, 2016)
 Cases for tax scrutiny will be selected by machines
 Time to revisit 1997 direct tax rates, says P Chidambaram
 Lok Sabha passes Bill to tax black money deposits post demonetisation
 Last day to pay property tax with old notes
 Income tax department asks IDS declarants to pay tax by 30 November
 Why PM Narendra Modi must beware of the breathtaking Arthakranti tax
 Japanese firms seek easing of restrictions on funding in India
 Tax on black money: How the cookie will crumble
 Income tax officials say raids on jewellers based on 'credible intelligence' proving fruitful
 Exchange window being misused, government forced to reduce limit to Rs 2000, says Arun Jaitley

India ensures tax equalisation for international posting
July, 01st 2013

There are a large number of multinational companies operating in India. In case of multinational companies, it is a common practice that their employees are transferred from one country to other countries for serving offices situated in various countries. Since the rate of tax on salary income differs from country to country, therefore, whenever an employee is relocated, his prime tax liability would also be different.

In such a situation, the employer normally gives an assurance to the employee that the employee will continue to receive the same salary that he would have received had he not been relocated to another country.

This assurance is given by following the tax equalisation policy. Tax equalisation is one of the methods widely used by multinational corporations to ensure that their employees who are on international assignment do not suffer combined taxes on income (in home and host country) in excess of what they would have paid had they continued to reside in the home country.

This arrangement is quite prevalent to ensure that the employee neither suffers a financial hardship nor realise a financial windfall from the tax consequences of international assignment.

Under tax equalisation policy, the employer calculates the hypothetical tax (hypo tax) and excludes the same from the employee's pay. The hypo tax is the amount of the tax liability that the employee would have continued to bear in his home country had he not been seconded to another country. The employer then assumes the obligation of paying the actual taxes incurred by the employee at the assignment location and at home. It is always subject to the condition that the employee would not be eligible to that part of the salary which is equal to his tax liability in home country which would have arisen if he had not been transferred to another country.

The above legal issue was discussed by the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of CIT v Percy Batlivala, 2010-TII-02-HC-DEL-INTL. The Hon'ble Court explained the legal position by an illustration. "This can be demonstrated by the following example: Suppose in US, gross salary is Rs 100/-, of which Rs 25/- payable as tax, net amount receivable by the assessee in US would be Rs 75/-. Likewise, suppose in India tax payable is Rs 15/-. Since, the assessee is assured net amount receivable in US, he would get Rs 75/- and the difference of Rs 10/- is treated as 'hypothetical tax'."

In the above situation, the issue which arises for consideration is whether the taxable income of the employee in India would include the amount of hypothetical tax also or not (Rs 10 in the above example).

Reference in this connection may also be made to a recent decision of Delhi Tribunal in the case of ACIT v Robert Arthur Keltz, in ITA No 3452/Del/2011. Facts in brief: Mr. Robert Arthur Keltz, an employee of United Technologies International Operation, USA (UTIO) was sent to India on assignment on April 1, 2006, under tax equalisation scheme. In return of income, the amount of hypo tax was excluded from the income of the employee.

The Ld. AO has added back the amount of hypo tax to the base salary on the contention that as no specific exemption or deduction is granted for hypo tax under the Income Tax Act, 1961 and on the erroneous understanding that the income has already accrued to the employee, hence, hypo tax forms part of the employee's taxable salary.

The Tribunal following the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of CIT v Percy Batlivala, 2010-TII-02-HC-DEL-INTL held that the amount of hypo tax is not liable for tax in India. The Hon'ble Delhi High Court in CIT v Percy Batlivala (Supra) has held that it is clear that insofar as the employee is concerned, he had received Rs 90 only (in the above example, i.e. Rs 75 salary and Rs 15 taxes in India), Rs 10 was not received at all in view of the nature of the arrangement between the employer and the employee.

Therefore, there was no question of addition of this hypothetical tax to the income of the assessee and asking the assessee to pay tax thereon. There is no dispute that the assessee has paid tax on the actual salary received by him in India.

Thus, even on the application of first principle and adopting common sense approach, it is clear that the addition made by the AO on account of so called hypo tax was unsustainable.It is thus clear that Indian judicial authorities have given their approval to tax equalisation system so that the employees on international posting remain immune to differential tax rates prevailing in different countries.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Enterprise Resource Planning Solutions ERP Solutions Enterprise Resource Planning Software Solutions ERP Software Solutions Supply Chain Management Solutions SCM Solutions Supply Chain Management Software Solutions SCM Software Solutions Enterprise Resource Planning Solutions India ERP Solutions India Enterprise Resource Planning Software Solutions India ERP Software Solutions India Supply Chain Management Solutions India SCM Solutions India Supply Chain Management Software Solutions India SCM Software Solutions India

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions