Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link:
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Popular Search: articles on VAT and GST in India :: empanelment :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: VAT RATES :: TDS :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: form 3cd :: due date for vat payment :: cpt :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: VAT Audit
From the Courts »
 Virag Tiwari Vs. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-21 & Others
  Anand Agarwal vs. Vilas Chandrakant Gaokar (Bombay High Court)
 Maxopp Investment Ltd vs. CIT (Supreme Court)
 Order of a Four-Member Appellate Authority constituted under Chartered Accountants Act is Valid: Delhi HC
 Emami Infrastructure Ltd vs. ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
  Anand Agarwal vs. Vilas Chandrakant Gaokar (Bombay High Court)
 Bar Council of India vs. A. K. Balaji & Ors (Supreme Court)
 ITO vs. Venkatesh Premises Co-op Society Ltd (Supreme Court)
 Pr CIT vs. Amphenol Interconnect India P. Ltd (Bombay High Court)
 Pr CIT vs. Amphenol Interconnect India P. Ltd (Bombay High Court)
 Anand Agarwal vs. Vilas Chandrakant Gaokar (Bombay High Court)

Yogesh Pandit & Co.,C/o Maqsood A. Adam, Advocate,09, Zila Parishad Market, 1st floor,Court Road, Kala Aam,Buland Shahr (UP) 201 301 vs. ITO, Ward-2,Buland Shahr (UP)-2013001
July, 25th 2012
                                                                 I.T.A. NO. 19/DEL/2012


                       DELHI BENCH "SMC": NEW DELHI


                             ITA No. 19/Del/2012
                                A.Y. : 2001-02

Yogesh Pandit & Co.,                           vs.    ITO, Ward-2,
C/o Maqsood A. Adam, Advocate,                        Buland Shahr (UP)-2013001
09, Zila Parishad Market, 1st floor,
Court Road, Kala Aam,
Buland Shahr (UP) ­ 201 301
(PAN : AAAFY3929L)

(Appellant)                                                (Respondent)
                   Assessee by         :       None
                   Department by       :       Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Sr. D.R.
      This appeal by the Assessee is directed against the order of the
Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Meerut dated 17.3.2009
pertaining to assessment year 2001-02.

2.    In this case total taxable income was computed by the Assessing
Officer at ` 1,18,760/-.

3.    Upon assessee's appeal Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (A)
noted that there was 45 days in filing the                appeal before the Ld.
Commissioner of Income Tax (A). Assessee in this regard also
submitted     a medical certificate            before the Ld. Commissioner of
Income Tax (A).       However, Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (A) has
not accepted the medical certificate and he opined that 45 days is not
required for rest due to typhoid fever.              Hence, Ld. Commissioner of
Income Tax (A) dismissed the assessee's appeal.

4.    Against the above order the assessee is in appeal before me.

                                                               I.T.A. NO. 19/DEL/2012

5.     I have heard the Ld. Departmental Representative and perused
the records.       None appeared on behalf of the assessee. However, in
my considered opinion, the matter may be disposed of by hearing the
Ld. Departmental Representative and perusing the records.                   I have
carefully considered the records, in my considered opinion, there was
a    reasonable     cause for    not   filing   the   appeal   before    the    Ld.
Commissioner of Income Tax (A) in time.                 Hence, I condone the
appeal of the assessee and remit back the issue to the file of the Ld.
Commissioner of Income Tax (A). The Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax
(A) shall adjudicate the matter on merits and decide accordingly.
Needless to add that the assessee should be given adequate
opportunity of being heard.

6.     In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed for
statistical purposes.
        Order pronounced in the open court               on 23/7/2012, upon
conclusion of hearing.

                                                         [SHAMIM YAHYA]
                                                      ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Date: 23/7/2012
Copy forwarded to: -
1.     Appellant    2.   Respondent    3.   CIT   4.CIT (A)    5.     DR, ITAT
                                TRUE COPY                      By Order,

                                       Assistant Registrar, ITAT, Delhi Benches

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
System Testing Solution Manual Software Testing Solutions Automation Software Testing Solutions System Workflow Testing System Manual Testing

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions