Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: cpt :: VAT Audit :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: empanelment :: TDS :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: form 3cd :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: due date for vat payment :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: VAT RATES :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT
 
 
« From the Courts »
 Delhi High Court interprets applicability of amendments to Arbitration Act
  M/s Skin Institute And Public Services Charitable Trust Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption)
 M/s Skin Institute And Public Services Charitable Trust Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption)
 ITO vs. Emami Paper Mills Ltd (ITAT Kolkata)
 Surya Prakash Toshniwal HUF vs. ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
 CIT vs. Subhash Vinayak Supnekar (Bombay High Court)
 Apollo Tyres Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Cochin)
 CIT vs. SSA’s Emerald Meadows (Supreme Court)
 DCIT vs. M. K. Enterprise (ITAT Kolkata)
 Qad Europe B.V. vs. DDIT (ITAT Mumbai)
 Chalasani Naga Ratna Kumari vs. ITO (ITAT Vizag)a

Subhadradevi Daga,4th floor, 18/22, Sheikh Menon Street, Mumbai-02 VS. ITO 14(1)(1),Earnest House, Nariman point, Mumbai-21.
July, 06th 2012
                        IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,
                                MUMBAI BENCH I' BENCH

                BEFORE SHRI B.R.MITTAL(JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND
                   SHRI N.K.BILLAIYA (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER)

                                   ITA No.2527/Mum/2009
                                 Assessment Year: 2003 -04

Subhadradevi Daga,                       VS ITO 14(1)(1),
4th floor, 18/22, Sheikh Menon              Earnest House, Nariman point,
Street, Mumbai-02                           Mumbai-21.

Pa No.AFFPF 7443 E

(Appellant)                                   (Respondent)


                               Appellant by : Shri Vimal Punmiya
                               Respondent by: Shri Parthararthi Naik

Date of hearing:                13.6.2012
Date of pronouncement:             4.7.2012




                                       ORDER

Per B.R.Mittal, JM:

         The assessee has filed this appeal for assessment year 2003-04 against order
dated 7.1.2009 of ld CIT(A), Mumbai on the following ground:
         "Compensation received from M/s. M.R. & D.R. Thacker towards mental
         stress and hardship faced by your appellant and also on account of loss
         of valuable articles, stamps, chandelier, etc be held as capital receipts in
         nature and not liable to be taxed under provisions of Income Tax Act,
         1961."

2.       At the time of hearing, ld A.R. for the assessee submitted that ld CIT(A) has
passed    exparte order and referred para 4 of the said order.        He submitted that ld
CIT(A) has not considered the entire facts while dismissing the appeal of the assessee.
Ld D.R. submitted that the matter could be restored to the file of ld CIT(A) on the facts
and circumstances of the case.


3.       Considering above submissions of ld representatives of parties that the order of
ld CIT(A) has been passed exparte, we set aside the order of ld CIT(A) and restore the
                                             2                            ITA No.2527/Mum/2009
                                                                       Assessment Year: 2003 -04





appeal to his file to decide the issue afresh after giving due opportunity of hearing to
both the parties and considering such evidences as may be placed before him. Hence,
ground of appeal taken by assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.


4.     In the result, appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.


       Pronounced in the open court on           4th July, 2012


                  Sd/-                                              Sd/-
             (N.K.BILLAIYA)                                    (B.R. MITTAL)
           Accountant Member                                  Judicial Member

Mumbai, Dated        4th July, 2012
Parida

Copy to:
1. The appellant
2. The respondent
3. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals),XIV, Mumbai
4. Commissioner of Income Tax, 14, Mumbai
5. Departmental Representative, Bench `I' Mumbai

//TRUE COPY//                                                 BY ORDER


                                              ASSTT. REGISTRAR, ITAT, MUMBAI
 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Outsourcing Test Solutions Software Testing Software Bug Testing Software Issues Tracking Software Issue Fix Software Code Optimization Database Design Optimization

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions