Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link:
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Popular Search: form 3cd :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: cpt :: TDS :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: VAT Audit :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: VAT RATES :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: due date for vat payment :: empanelment
« From the Courts »
 Virag Tiwari Vs. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-21 & Others
  Anand Agarwal vs. Vilas Chandrakant Gaokar (Bombay High Court)
 Maxopp Investment Ltd vs. CIT (Supreme Court)
 Order of a Four-Member Appellate Authority constituted under Chartered Accountants Act is Valid: Delhi HC
 Emami Infrastructure Ltd vs. ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
  Anand Agarwal vs. Vilas Chandrakant Gaokar (Bombay High Court)
 Bar Council of India vs. A. K. Balaji & Ors (Supreme Court)
 ITO vs. Venkatesh Premises Co-op Society Ltd (Supreme Court)
 Pr CIT vs. Amphenol Interconnect India P. Ltd (Bombay High Court)
 Pr CIT vs. Amphenol Interconnect India P. Ltd (Bombay High Court)
 Anand Agarwal vs. Vilas Chandrakant Gaokar (Bombay High Court)

Subhadradevi Daga,4th floor, 18/22, Sheikh Menon Street, Mumbai-02 VS. ITO 14(1)(1),Earnest House, Nariman point, Mumbai-21.
July, 06th 2012
                                MUMBAI BENCH I' BENCH


                                   ITA No.2527/Mum/2009
                                 Assessment Year: 2003 -04

Subhadradevi Daga,                       VS ITO 14(1)(1),
4th floor, 18/22, Sheikh Menon              Earnest House, Nariman point,
Street, Mumbai-02                           Mumbai-21.

Pa No.AFFPF 7443 E

(Appellant)                                   (Respondent)

                               Appellant by : Shri Vimal Punmiya
                               Respondent by: Shri Parthararthi Naik

Date of hearing:                13.6.2012
Date of pronouncement:             4.7.2012


Per B.R.Mittal, JM:

         The assessee has filed this appeal for assessment year 2003-04 against order
dated 7.1.2009 of ld CIT(A), Mumbai on the following ground:
         "Compensation received from M/s. M.R. & D.R. Thacker towards mental
         stress and hardship faced by your appellant and also on account of loss
         of valuable articles, stamps, chandelier, etc be held as capital receipts in
         nature and not liable to be taxed under provisions of Income Tax Act,

2.       At the time of hearing, ld A.R. for the assessee submitted that ld CIT(A) has
passed    exparte order and referred para 4 of the said order.        He submitted that ld
CIT(A) has not considered the entire facts while dismissing the appeal of the assessee.
Ld D.R. submitted that the matter could be restored to the file of ld CIT(A) on the facts
and circumstances of the case.

3.       Considering above submissions of ld representatives of parties that the order of
ld CIT(A) has been passed exparte, we set aside the order of ld CIT(A) and restore the
                                             2                            ITA No.2527/Mum/2009
                                                                       Assessment Year: 2003 -04

appeal to his file to decide the issue afresh after giving due opportunity of hearing to
both the parties and considering such evidences as may be placed before him. Hence,
ground of appeal taken by assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

4.     In the result, appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.

       Pronounced in the open court on           4th July, 2012

                  Sd/-                                              Sd/-
             (N.K.BILLAIYA)                                    (B.R. MITTAL)
           Accountant Member                                  Judicial Member

Mumbai, Dated        4th July, 2012

Copy to:
1. The appellant
2. The respondent
3. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals),XIV, Mumbai
4. Commissioner of Income Tax, 14, Mumbai
5. Departmental Representative, Bench `I' Mumbai

//TRUE COPY//                                                 BY ORDER

                                              ASSTT. REGISTRAR, ITAT, MUMBAI
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Outsourcing Test Solutions Software Testing Software Bug Testing Software Issues Tracking Software Issue Fix Software Code Optimization Database Design Optimization

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions