Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: cpt :: due date for vat payment :: form 3cd :: TDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: VAT Audit :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: empanelment :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: VAT RATES
 
 
From the Courts »
 Reliance Communications Ltd vs. DDIT (ITAT Mumbai)
  Sushila Devi vs. CIT (Delhi High Court)
 Ashok Prapann Sharma vs. CIT (Supreme Court)a
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
 M.K.Overseas Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Pr.Commissioner Of Income Tax-06
 Arshia Ahmed Qureshi Vs. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-21
 CHAUDHARY SKIN TRADING COMPANY Vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-21
  Sushila Devi vs. CIT (Delhi High Court)
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
 Deputy Director Of Income Tax Vs. Virage Logic International

M/s Jai Shree Ram Stone Crushers (I) Pvt. Ltd. Rampur Road, Haldwani Distt. Nainital. Vs. ACIT, Haldwani,Distt. Nainital.
July, 17th 2012
                IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                     (DELHI BENCH : `D' NEW DELHI)
            BEFORE SHRI U.B.S. BEDI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND
          SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA KAPOOR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

                                ITA No.3609/Del./2011
                               (Assessment Year : 2005-06)

M/s Jai Shree Ram Stone Crushers (I) Pvt. Ltd. Vs.         ACIT, Haldwani,
Rampur Road, Haldwani                                      Distt. Nainital.
Distt. Nainital.
(PAN/GIR No.AABCJ2477L)

(Appellant)                                                (Respondent)

                       Assessee by : Shri Tarun Kumar, Adv.
                       Revenue by : Ms. Srujani Mohanty, DR

                                      ORDER

PER U.B.S. BEDI JM

       This appeal of the assessee is directed against the order passed by the CIT(A)-II,
Dehradun dated 11.05.2011, whereby confirmation of penalty of Rs.7,25,000/- imposed
u/s 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act, 1961 for assessment year 2005-06 has been challenged.





2.     At the very outset, Ld.Counsel for the assessee while filing copy of the order in
quantum appeal in I.T.A. No.348/Del./2009 for assessment year 2005-06 dated
26.9.2011, submitted that matter in relation to addition made by the Assessing Officer
has been restored back on the file of the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication and
since the very basis on which penalty has been imposed has vanished. Therefore, either
penalty should be quashed or matter should be restored back to the file of the Assessing
Officer for re-consideration of the penalty.


3.     Ld.DR could not controvert this aspect and very fairly submitted that matter can
go back to the Assessing Officer for re-consideration of the penalty matter after quantum
is decided.
                                             2                   I.T.A. No.3609/Del./2011)
                                                                          (A.Y. : 2005-06)
4.     We have heard both the sides, considered the material on record and find that the
addition on the basis on which penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act has been imposed by the
Assessing Officer has since been set aside and matter has been restored back to the file of
the Assessing Officer for re-adjudication vide order dated 26.9.2011, therefore, it would
be just and appropriate to set aside the orders of authorities below in relation to penalty
and restore the matter back on the file of the Assessing Officer with the direction to re-
decide the penalty after the issue of addition is re-decided by the Assessing Officer. We
hold and direct accordingly.

5.     As a result, the appeal of the assessee gets accepted for statistical purposes.

       Order pronounced in open court on 16.07.2012.

            Sd/-                                          Sd/-
      (SHAMIM YAHYA)                                 (U.B.S.BEDI)
ACCOUNTANT MEMBER                              JUDICIAL MEMBER
Dated: July         16, 2012.
*SKB*
Copy forwarded to:-
   1. The Appellant
   2. The Respondent
   3. The CIT
   4. The CIT(A)II, Dehradun.
   5. The DR, ITAT, Loknayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi.


                                                                        AR/ITAT



 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Outsourcing Test Solutions Software Testing Software Bug Testing Software Issues Tracking Software Issue Fix Software Code Optimization Database Design Optimization

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions