Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: articles on VAT and GST in India :: due date for vat payment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: VAT RATES :: VAT Audit :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: empanelment :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: cpt :: form 3cd :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: TDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: list of goods taxed at 4%
 
 
From the Courts »
 Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi-1 Vs. Amadeus India Pvt. Ltd.
  AAA Paper Marketing Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Lucknow)
 CIT vs. Mettler Toledo India Pvt. Ltd (Bombay High Court)
 B.A.Mohota Textiles Traders Pvt. Ltd vs. DCIT (Bombay High Court)
 Shrey Infradevelopers Pvt Ltd Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax
 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-2 New Delhi Vs. Meeta Gutgutia Prop. M/s Ferns „N'? Petals
 Shrey Infradevelopers Pvt. Ltd Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax
 South Asian Enterprises Ltd. & Anr. Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr
 Crescent Construction Co vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
 AAA Paper Marketing Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Lucknow)
 Pioneer Overseas Corporation Usa (India Branch) Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax (International Taxation)- 2 Delhi

M/s Jai Shree Ram Stone Crushers (I) Pvt. Ltd. Rampur Road, Haldwani Distt. Nainital. Vs. ACIT, Haldwani,Distt. Nainital.
July, 17th 2012
                IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                     (DELHI BENCH : `D' NEW DELHI)
            BEFORE SHRI U.B.S. BEDI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND
          SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA KAPOOR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

                                ITA No.3609/Del./2011
                               (Assessment Year : 2005-06)

M/s Jai Shree Ram Stone Crushers (I) Pvt. Ltd. Vs.         ACIT, Haldwani,
Rampur Road, Haldwani                                      Distt. Nainital.
Distt. Nainital.
(PAN/GIR No.AABCJ2477L)

(Appellant)                                                (Respondent)

                       Assessee by : Shri Tarun Kumar, Adv.
                       Revenue by : Ms. Srujani Mohanty, DR

                                      ORDER

PER U.B.S. BEDI JM

       This appeal of the assessee is directed against the order passed by the CIT(A)-II,
Dehradun dated 11.05.2011, whereby confirmation of penalty of Rs.7,25,000/- imposed
u/s 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act, 1961 for assessment year 2005-06 has been challenged.





2.     At the very outset, Ld.Counsel for the assessee while filing copy of the order in
quantum appeal in I.T.A. No.348/Del./2009 for assessment year 2005-06 dated
26.9.2011, submitted that matter in relation to addition made by the Assessing Officer
has been restored back on the file of the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication and
since the very basis on which penalty has been imposed has vanished. Therefore, either
penalty should be quashed or matter should be restored back to the file of the Assessing
Officer for re-consideration of the penalty.


3.     Ld.DR could not controvert this aspect and very fairly submitted that matter can
go back to the Assessing Officer for re-consideration of the penalty matter after quantum
is decided.
                                             2                   I.T.A. No.3609/Del./2011)
                                                                          (A.Y. : 2005-06)
4.     We have heard both the sides, considered the material on record and find that the
addition on the basis on which penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act has been imposed by the
Assessing Officer has since been set aside and matter has been restored back to the file of
the Assessing Officer for re-adjudication vide order dated 26.9.2011, therefore, it would
be just and appropriate to set aside the orders of authorities below in relation to penalty
and restore the matter back on the file of the Assessing Officer with the direction to re-
decide the penalty after the issue of addition is re-decided by the Assessing Officer. We
hold and direct accordingly.

5.     As a result, the appeal of the assessee gets accepted for statistical purposes.

       Order pronounced in open court on 16.07.2012.

            Sd/-                                          Sd/-
      (SHAMIM YAHYA)                                 (U.B.S.BEDI)
ACCOUNTANT MEMBER                              JUDICIAL MEMBER
Dated: July         16, 2012.
*SKB*
Copy forwarded to:-
   1. The Appellant
   2. The Respondent
   3. The CIT
   4. The CIT(A)II, Dehradun.
   5. The DR, ITAT, Loknayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi.


                                                                        AR/ITAT



 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Outsourcing Test Solutions Software Testing Software Bug Testing Software Issues Tracking Software Issue Fix Software Code Optimization Database Design Optimization

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions