Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
 Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
 Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
 ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
 Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
 [Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court
 Rajasthan High Court directs GST Authority to Unblock Input Tax Credit availed in Electronic Credit Ledger
 Sebi-taxman fight over service tax dues reaches Supreme Court
 Delhi High Court Seeks Status Report from Centre for Appointments of Chairperson & Members in Adjudicating Authority Under PMLA
 Delhi High Court allows Income Tax Exemption to Charitable Society running Printing Press and uses Profit so generated for Charitable Purposes
 ITAT accepts Lease Income as Business Income as Business Investments were mostly in nature of Properties

M/s Associated Printers,Chandigarh Vs The ITO, Ward-2(1),Chandigarh
July, 11th 2012
              IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
              CHANDIGARH BENCHES `SMC' CHANDIGARH


           BEFORE SHRI H.L.KARWA, HON'BLE VICE PRESIDENT


                             ITA No. 619/Chd/2012
                            Assessment Year: 2007-08


M/s Associated Printers,       Vs           The ITO, Ward-2(1),
Chandigarh                                  Chandigarh


PAN No. AAGFA1794F

(Appellant)                                       (Respondent)


                    Appellant By     : S/Shri S.K. Mukhi & Shaman Jain
                    Respondent By    : Shri N.K. Saini


                    Date of hearing       : 09.07.2012
                    Date of Pronouncement : 09.07.2012







                                    ORDER


PER H.L.KARWA, VP


      This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of

CIT(A), Chandigarh dated 1.3.2012 relating to assessment year 2007-08.



2.    In this appeal, the assessee has taken the following grounds:-


      1.      That the Ld. CIT (A) is not justified in considering the
              consolidated appeal filed against the order u/s 143(3) &
              154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as appeal against the
              order u/s 154 only.

      2.      That the Ld. CIT (A) is not justified in holding the
                                                                              2


            consolidated appeal filed against the order u/s 143(3) &
            154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as appeal against the
            order u/s 154 only and further holding the appeal u/s
            143(3) being beyond limitation period.

      3.    That the Ld. CIT (A) is not justified in holding the
            consolidated appeal filed against the order u/s 143(3) &
            154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as appeal against the
            order u/s 154 only and thereby not disposing off ground of
            appeal No. 2 being the grievance of the appellant against
            the disallowance of the bad debts of Rs 1,21,683/- which is
            bad in law, perverse and illegal.


      4.    That the Ld. CIT (A) is not justified in holding the
            consolidated appeal filed against the order u/s 143(3) &
            154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as appeal against the
            order u/s 154 only and thereby not disposing off ground of
            appeal No.2 being the grievance of the appellant against
            the disallowance of the bad debts of Rs 1,21,683/- which is
            bad in law, perverse and illegal and being mistake on the
            part of the Counsel since consolidated appeal having filed
            on his advice though under his bonafide belief that the
            scrutiny assessment order u/s143(3) mer ges with order u/s
            154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Thus needs intervention of
            this Hon'ble Bench.

      5.    That without prejudice to above the appellant dis putes the
            very findings of the Id. CIT (A) without appreciating
            the facts   and circumstances,   evidences    on    record
            which is also against the principles of Natural Justice.

      6.    That the appellant craves leave to add, amend and delete
            any of the grounds of appeal on or before the disposal of
            the present appeal.


3.    S/Shri S.K. Mukhi and Shaman Jain,          Ld. Counsels for the assessee

vide their application dated 9.7.2012 stated as under:-


                   "Before the Hon'ble ITAT (SMC), CHD

                               In the matter of

            M/s Associated Printers         Vs      ITO, Ward-2(1),
            Chandigarh                              Chandigarh

            Appeal No. 619/Chandi/2012
                                                                             3








                            Sub:- Withdrawal of appeal.

            Respected Sir,


            I herewith withdraw the above said appeal with a liberty
            to file a independent appeal against the orders u/s 143(3)
            which could not be earlier filed on the advice of the then
            counsel (the unders igned) under a bonafide belief that
            since the alternative remedy in the form of application u/s
            154 was pursued.

                        Sd/-
            (Shaman Jain)/ S.K. Mukhi
            Counsel for the appellant
            9/7/2012"


4.    After hearing the Ld. Representatives of both the parties, I grant the

permiss ion to asses see to withdraw the appeal.       Thus, the appeal stands

dismissed as `withdrawn'.


5.    In the result, the appeal is dismissed.


      Order Pronounced in the Open Court on this 9th day of July, 2012



                                                          Sd/-
                                                       (H.L.KARWA)
                                                     VI CE PRESIDENT
Dated : 9 t h July, 2012
Rkk
Copy to:
  1.       The Appellant
  2.       The Respondent
  3.       The CIT
  4.       The CIT(A)
  5.       The DR
                            True Copy
                                                    By Order

                                                Assistant Registrar
4
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting