Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
Popular Search: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: form 3cd :: VAT RATES :: empanelment :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: TDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: due date for vat payment :: VAT Audit :: cpt :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company
« News Headlines »
 ICAI to organise two-day international conference in Hyderabad
 Here's how to calculate tax payable on your capital gains
 Income Tax calculations for the financial year 2016-17
 CPE Events 17 October - 22 October 2016
 High Court raps I-T Department for wrong tax demand
  CBDT signs 5 advance pricing pacts with Indian taxpayers
 Finance ministry warns tax officials of action against GST protest
 Big changes for small units under GST
 Parliament’s winter session to begin on November 16 to expedite GST rollout
 Income-tax (27th Amendment) Rules, 2016 - 92/2016
 Announcement - Clarifications in Respect of MEF 2016-17

Presumptive taxation scheme
July, 18th 2009

A Budget proposal that has created a lot of attention, interest and excitement among the small businesses is the presumptive taxation scheme. The Finance Bill, 2009, seeks to extend the scheme to all businesses with gross receipts not exceeding Rs 40 lakh; at present, the presumptive scheme is available to three businesses, viz. civil construction, retail trade and transporters.

Presumptive income taxation is employed primarily in economies where hard-to-tax taxpayers are the majority of the population, and administrative resources are scarce, observes Mr T. G. Suresh, a Chennai-based Chartered Accountant, specialising in direct taxes. In developing countries, where most taxpayers lack the financial transparency that allows for effective taxation by the Government, presumptive taxation may still be the most appropriate method of tax administration for specific groups of taxpayers, he adds, during a recent interaction with Business Line.

Mr Suresh reminds that while most tax laws are written as if tax is assessed on well-defined measures of income, in well-documented and transparent accounting records, the reality is that most taxpayers do not possess the administrative resources to maintain accurate books or navigate complex tax codes.

Excerpts from the interview.

At present the retail traders are required to offer only 5 per cent of the turnover as their income; what is the rationale of bringing them to the 8 per cent level?

I really dont find any rationale in bringing them under Section 44AD. On the contrary, with corporates entering retail in a big way, the retail traders margins would be under severe pressure, and hence a status quo or reduction could be contemplated.

Is there any alternative mechanism that the Government can consider?

The Government can consider introducing a tax amount in the range of Rs 7,500 to Rs 10,000, may be in two instalments. A similar scheme was introduced for retail traders by Mr Manmohan Singh when he was the Finance Minister; a small amount of Rs 1,400 was levied as tax. However, the scheme was discontinued on account of poor patronage. Now, with an extensive media coverage, and effective public campaign through print, electronic and Internet platforms, the scheme can be made successful. A small exemption ceiling in the lines of service tax, say up to Rs 10,00,000, may also be considered to benefit the small business people.

How does the tax administration generally go about detecting cases of misuse, such as bigger enterprises taking shelter under the presumptive taxation scheme?

Use of presumptive income taxes is often disputed on the grounds that it may cause erosion of the standard tax base, which may occur if large firms take shelter under the presumptive scheme.

Tax administration can always send notice under Section 143(2) to ascertain whether the gross receipts exceed Rs 40 lakh. Even under the proposed scheme, the Department is entitled to do so, to prevent the misuse of the scheme by the bigger enterprises.

As a chartered accountant, who aims at proper record-keeping and maintaining of books of account, do you view presumptive taxation schemes as retrograde?

It is generally an acceptable methodology, globally, to use presumptive income for bringing more people under the tax net. Small enterprises, especially the individually-owned, lack the resources to keep organised records of their economic activity. Examples are the neighbourhood grocery stores, fast-food kiosks, street vendors, small service enterprises and other such economic agents, who account for a large part of the informal sector.

These businesses are often family-operated and have very low profit margins. They are called informal because, for the most part, they do not exist as firms nor file tax returns even if they are required to do so by law.

While many such enterprises would undoubtedly fail to pay taxes anyway, the burden of tax compliance is very often a strong disincentive for those who are inclined to comply with the tax requirements. At the same time, the tax administration has very limited audit and enforcement resources. The risks of tax evasion under these circumstances are low enough that many small enterprises opt not to file a tax return.

It is important to note that these are in part taxpayers who might be willing to file, even with a low risk of penalty, if the compliance costs were lower; but they just lack the resources to meet the usual accounting standards that the law asks for.

Any solution to this problem must start with an effort to reduce the compliance costs for the prospective taxpayer. Its first objective should be to increase the number of tax returns filed.

Just increasing the number of tax returns will allow the tax administration to get better information on tax filers, regardless of the actual revenue collection. This should lower the cost of future enforcement, and eventually lead to lower expected return to evasion efforts.

Hence presumptive taxation should not be viewed a retrograde; on the contrary, it is a welcome move.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Website Ranking Website Ranking Company Website Positioning Alexa Ranking Website Promotion Website top 10 ranking website top 10 promotion search engine result promotion Strategic Internet Marketing Website Optimization Website Ranking Factors

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions