Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: cpt :: TDS :: VAT Audit :: VAT RATES :: due date for vat payment :: empanelment :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: form 3cd :: articles on VAT and GST in India
 
 
News Headlines »
 Directions under section 119 of the Income-tax Act, 1961
 Securities excluded from GST ambit in revised Bill
 GST dilemma: Hope fades for new tax regime
 5nance.com launches tax investment platform
 Is government tapping your phone?
 Income tax department to use analytics to look for discrepancies in bank accounts
 GST Council fails to break deadlock over indirect tax regime, next meet on Dec 11 and 12 to hammer out differences
 Invoking Writ Jurisdiction For Income Tax Matters
 How to file income-tax returns online
 How Income Tax Returns Are Scrutinised
 All About New Income Disclosure Scheme to make Demonetisation successful

Tax liability on retention money after receipt
July, 31st 2006

A large number of foreign companies are involved in the execution of various types of projects in India. 
 
Whereas payment terms differ from contract to contract, one common feature generally found in all contracts is that a certain portion of the contract amount (say 10 per cent or so) is retained by the principal as retention money, which is to be finally paid after completion of the contract or in certain cases upon satisfactory performance of the work, or after lapse of warranty period. 
 
Thus, this retention money may be paid to the foreign company several years after the completion of the contract. 
 
The issue for consideration is whether the retention money is to be treated as a foreign company's income on completion of the contract, or the same is to be treated as income only when the monies are actually received by the company. 
 
The aforesaid issue has recently been considered by the Madras High Court in two cases reported in 283 ITR 295 and 283 ITR 297. The issue raised was whether the monies retained by the contractee is to be treated as income only when the money is actually received by the contractor, even though the contractor is following mercantile system of accounting? 
 
The income-tax department brought the retention money to tax on completion of contract on the ground that the company was maintaining the mercantile system of accounting. 
 
On the other hand, the counsel for the contractor submitted that the money retained would be realised only when the customer was satisfied about the completion of the work entrusted to it. The company, therefore, was justified in treating the said amount as a contingent amount and would offer the same for tax on actual receipt basis. 
 
The high court observed that the retention money accrue to the assessee only after satisfactory completion of the contract. On the date of the bills, no enforceable liability had accrued or arisen. When the assessee had no right to receive the same by virtue of the contract between the parties, and the assessee also had no right to enforce payment, it could not be said that the right to receive payments of the remaining 10 per cent of the value of job done accrue as soon as it was completed. 
 
The high court also took note of the Supreme Court judgment in the case of CIT vs Shoorji Vallabhdas 46 ITR 144 in which it was held that income-tax is a levy on income. No doubt the income-tax Act took into account two points of time at which the liability to tax was attracted, viz., the accrual of the income or its receipt; but the substance of the matter was the income. 
 
If income did not result at all, there could not be a tax, even though in book-keeping an entry was made about a hypothetical income, which did not materialise. Based on the above reasons, the high court held that the retention money could be brought to tax only when actually received. 
 
The aforesaid reasoning is likely to open a new line of arguments for foreign companies to claim that retention money when received by them can be taxed only if the companies still have their permanent establishment (PE) in India. 
 
In cases where the retention money is received after the recipient foreign company ceases to have any PE in India, it is quite possible to successfully argue that the receipt of retention money will not be liable to tax in India.

H P Agrawal

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Software Work Flow Workflow Software Software Automation Workflow automation Software Design Workflow Design Business Work Flow Workflow automation tools

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions