Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: form 3cd :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: VAT RATES :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: TDS :: VAT Audit :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: empanelment :: cpt :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: due date for vat payment
 
 
News Headlines »
 Filing of online return for 4th quarter of 2016-17 — extension of period thereof
 CBDT simplifies ITR filing process from FY18
 Govt extends service tax return filing date to April 30
 No move to tax farm income, clarifies Arun Jaitley
 New board for indirect taxes to become operational from June 1
  9 changes that came into effect from April 1
 First time filing income tax? Here's all you need to know about Form 16 and Form 26AS
 New Opening Financial Controller Chartered Accountant (Manufacturing Plant) A Leading Company
 Income Tax Filing 2017: All you want to know about the single page ITR form SAHAJ
 How to benefit from investments in tax saving mutual funds
 60 per cent of income tax notices on fishy cash deposits returned

Tax liability on retention money after receipt
July, 31st 2006

A large number of foreign companies are involved in the execution of various types of projects in India. 
 
Whereas payment terms differ from contract to contract, one common feature generally found in all contracts is that a certain portion of the contract amount (say 10 per cent or so) is retained by the principal as retention money, which is to be finally paid after completion of the contract or in certain cases upon satisfactory performance of the work, or after lapse of warranty period. 
 
Thus, this retention money may be paid to the foreign company several years after the completion of the contract. 
 
The issue for consideration is whether the retention money is to be treated as a foreign company's income on completion of the contract, or the same is to be treated as income only when the monies are actually received by the company. 
 
The aforesaid issue has recently been considered by the Madras High Court in two cases reported in 283 ITR 295 and 283 ITR 297. The issue raised was whether the monies retained by the contractee is to be treated as income only when the money is actually received by the contractor, even though the contractor is following mercantile system of accounting? 
 
The income-tax department brought the retention money to tax on completion of contract on the ground that the company was maintaining the mercantile system of accounting. 
 
On the other hand, the counsel for the contractor submitted that the money retained would be realised only when the customer was satisfied about the completion of the work entrusted to it. The company, therefore, was justified in treating the said amount as a contingent amount and would offer the same for tax on actual receipt basis. 
 
The high court observed that the retention money accrue to the assessee only after satisfactory completion of the contract. On the date of the bills, no enforceable liability had accrued or arisen. When the assessee had no right to receive the same by virtue of the contract between the parties, and the assessee also had no right to enforce payment, it could not be said that the right to receive payments of the remaining 10 per cent of the value of job done accrue as soon as it was completed. 
 
The high court also took note of the Supreme Court judgment in the case of CIT vs Shoorji Vallabhdas 46 ITR 144 in which it was held that income-tax is a levy on income. No doubt the income-tax Act took into account two points of time at which the liability to tax was attracted, viz., the accrual of the income or its receipt; but the substance of the matter was the income. 
 
If income did not result at all, there could not be a tax, even though in book-keeping an entry was made about a hypothetical income, which did not materialise. Based on the above reasons, the high court held that the retention money could be brought to tax only when actually received. 
 
The aforesaid reasoning is likely to open a new line of arguments for foreign companies to claim that retention money when received by them can be taxed only if the companies still have their permanent establishment (PE) in India. 
 
In cases where the retention money is received after the recipient foreign company ceases to have any PE in India, it is quite possible to successfully argue that the receipt of retention money will not be liable to tax in India.

H P Agrawal

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Software Work Flow Workflow Software Software Automation Workflow automation Software Design Workflow Design Business Work Flow Workflow automation tools

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions