Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link: https://ims.go2customer.com
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft info@binarysoft.com
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: VAT Audit :: due date for vat payment :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: TDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: cpt :: VAT RATES :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: form 3cd :: empanelment
 
 
News Headlines »
 Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) Rules, 2017 (As on 15.11.2017)
 Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Rules,2017 (As on 15.11.2017)
  101st Constitution Amendment Act, 2016
 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-6 Vs. Mccain Foods India Pvt. Ltd.
 Section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1961
 Income tax returns filing: No tax on gift received from relatives in form of cash
 Income tax returns (ITR): Here is why you need to pay higher tax on other incomes
 GST Update On Issuance Of Debit Notes And Credit Notes
 How Mutual Fund Investments Can Help Save Income Tax
 Income tax returns (ITR) filing: Why small service providers need to get this benefit
 How NRIs can avoid tax troubles

Bank guarantee could not be invoked if arbitration award is challenged: HC
July, 27th 2006

The arbitration law stipulated that a bank guarantee issued in favour of a company as part of an arbitration award could not be invoked if the award itself had become inexecutable with the admission by the High Court of a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging the award, the Madras High Court has held.

Mr Justice S. Rajeswaran, who heard an application from a Chennai-based company praying for a pro-order prohibiting Indian Overseas Bank, Chennai from paying a sum of Rs 7.8 lakh executed in favour of a firm ( Kalyanee Marine, Chennai) pending execution of the arbitration award dated March 10, 2006 against the applicant herein (IOCEE Exports Ltd), said that from the orders of the Supreme Court and a Division Bench of this Court, it was clear that the first respondent could not approach the bank to invoke the bank guarantee.

Once a petition challenging the award was admitted by the Court, the award became inexecutable, the Judge ruled.

As per the award, the applicant was directed to pay a sum of Rs 15,36,032 to the first respondent (Kalyanee Marine), and further the arbitrator directed the first respondent to invoke the bank guarantee of Indian Overseas Bank.

Challenging the award, a petition under Section 34 was filed and this Court admitted the same on July 7, 2006 and ordered private notice to the respondents. It was the case of the applicant that pending the petition, the first respondent was also attempting to invoke the bank guarantee executed by the applicant in favour of IOB. Hence the present application has been filed for injunction under Section 9 of the Act.

The Judge said that under Section 35 of the Act, an arbitration award shall be final and binding on the parties, and under Section 36, it could be enforced only after the expiry of the time for making an application under Section 34, or if an application had been made, only after it had been refused by the Court. Till such time, the award could not be enforced.

Hence, in view of the legal position, the application for restraining the bank from paying the amount covered under the bank guarantee was redundant and not maintainable.

The applicant was however directed to send a copy of this order to the bank informing them about the inexecutability of the entire award, including the direction to the bank to permit the first respondent to invoke the bank guarantee. The application was dismissed.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - We Bring IT. Offshore software outsourcing company. We use Global Delivery Model (GDM) and believe in Follow The Sun principle

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions