Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Karnataka High Court restrains Bengaluru-based Institute of Chartered Tax Practitioners India from enrolling candidates for its courses
 Attachment on Cash Credit of Assessee under GST Act: Delhi HC directs Bank to Comply Instructions to Vacate
 Income Tax Addition Made Towards Unsubstantiated Share Capital Is Eligible For Section 80-IC Deduction: Delhi High Court
 Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
 Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
 Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
 ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
 Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
 [Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court
 Rajasthan High Court directs GST Authority to Unblock Input Tax Credit availed in Electronic Credit Ledger
 Sebi-taxman fight over service tax dues reaches Supreme Court

Shipra Estate Ltd. and Jai Krishan Estate Developers Pvt. Ltd., Delhi. vs. ACIT, Circle 58(1), New Delhi.
June, 14th 2019
                  In the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal,
                        Delhi Bench `G', New Delhi

              Before : Shri H.S. Sidhu, Judicial Member And
                       Shri B.R.R. Kumar, Accountant Member

                         ITA No. 2232/Del/2019
                        Assessment Year: 2010-11

        Shipra Estate Ltd. and Jai Krishan    vs. ACIT, Circle 58(1),
        Estate Developers Pvt. Ltd., Delhi.       New Delhi.
        PAN- ABGFS9748C
        (Appellant)                                (Respondent)

                 Appellant by        Sh. Prateek Gupta and
                                     Sh. Pancham Sethi, CA
                 Respondent by       Sh. N.K. Bansal, Sr. DR

                  Date of Hearing              12.06.2019
                  Date of Pronouncement        13.06.2019

                                   ORDER
Per B.R.R. Kumar, A.M.:
      In this case, the assessment has been completed on 14.02.2013
disallowing the deduction of Rs.9,87,39,565/- claimed by the assessee u/s.
80IB. The matter travelled upto the ITAT wherein the ITAT adjudicated the
matter on 26.04.2018 with the directions to re-compute the deduction after
examination of the issue afresh and determine the deduction.







2.   Before us, it was brought to our notice that the Assessing Officer has
issued notice u/s. 142(1) of the IT Act on 10.06.2019 to the assessee and the
proceedings in response to the order of the ITAT are still pending before the
                                                            ITA No. 2232/Del/2019          2


Assessing Officer. Since the core issue of deduction under section 80IB has
been remanded back to examine the issue afresh, the penalty levied by the
Assessing Officer vide order dated 29.03.2017 is hereby set aside. The
department would be at liberty to levy penalty after conclusion of the
proceedings by the assessing officer as directed by this Tribunal vide order
dated 26.04.2018
3. In the result, the appeal is allowed. Order pronounced in the open court. Sd/- Sd/- (H.S. Sidhu) (B.R.R. Kumar) Judicial member Accountant Member Dated: 13.06.2019 *aks* Copy of order forwarded to: (1) The appellant (2) The respondent (3) Commissioner (4) CIT(A) (5) Departmental Representative (6) Guard File By order Assistant Registrar Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Delhi Benches, New Delhi
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2025 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting