News shortcuts: From the Courts | Top Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | Professional Updates | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax | PPE Safety Kit SITRA Approved | PPE Safety Kit
GST - Goods and Services Tax »
 GST faces challenge to meet higher revenue expectations
 Retrospective Amendment of Section 140 of CGST Act: Companies drag Govt. to Court for not able to claim Transitional Credit
 As GST enters fourth year, biggest challenge would be to devise ways to compensate the states
 Three Years of GST in India: Past, Present and Expectations
 No GST on Security Service and Supply of Manpower to Government Departments Read more at:
  GST Council offers relief on late filing of tax returns
 Why Section 129 of the Central Goods & Service Tax Act become Unconstitutional GST
 Why Section 129 of the Central Goods & Service Tax Act become Unconstitutional GST
 The GST compensation imbroglio
 GST late fee waiver unfair, say those who have paid
 GST Council relaxes compliance penalties for firms

Exporters want benefits of Capital Goods Scheme under GST regime
June, 07th 2019

Many Indian exporters approached the Delhi High Court last week against the government for not extending the benefits of EPCG (Export Promotion Capital Goods) scheme to goods and services tax (GST) regime.

The exporters claimed that some of the services that were earlier allowed under the EPCG scheme were discontinued under the GST regime. According the exporters, the government has set some conditions if exporters were to claim benefits of the scheme.

These amendments meant that some exporters were unable to meet export obligations resulting in losing out on the benefits of the EPCG scheme under which an exporter can import certain amount of capital goods without paying any duty for upgrading technology related with exports. “The incentives announced prior to GST have been curtailed in some form and may be unintentional in various cases, thereby raising the situation of court intervention. It is impossible to meet the obligation for the EPCG licence issued prior to GST regime, the principle of supervening public interest will have to be tested,” argued Abhishek A Rastogi, partner at Khaitan & Co.

In October, the government, through an EPCG notification, gave some leeway but created some problems for certain section of the exporters. Directorate General of Foreign Trade extended the timeline for availing benefits of the EPCG scheme by six months through a notification.

The notification meant that exporters were required to make sure that the average export obligation is maintained during a time. The specified services that qualified to meet export obligation have been removed. “Various issues of notification have been a subject matter of judicial review on various legal parameters,” said Rastogi. This is the second time the exporters moved the court after some benefits available under the earlier tax regime were not transitioned under GST.

Giving respite to several exporters issued notices by the tax department, the Madurai bench of the Madras HC held that pre-import conditions led to absurdity and were not relevant when the exporter had already exported the goods. The issue pertained to the tax treatment of transactions where exporters ship the finished products before import of raw material and then claim the benefits. The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, India’s primary anti-smuggling intelligence agency, started issuing show-cause notices to exporters for wrongfully availing exemptions in cases where exports preceded imports.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us | PPE Kit SITRA Approved | PPE Safety Kit
Copyright 2020 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting