News shortcuts: From the Courts | Top Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | Professional Updates | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
From the Courts »
 Cleared Secured Services Pvt Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
 Kaish Impex Private Limited vs. UOI (Bombay High Court)
 Publishers Cricket League, New Delhi. Vs. CIT(Exemptions). New Delhi.
 Dinesh Kumar Pundir C/o Sh. Dinesh Mohan, Advocate, 2-Anand Vihar, Lane No. 1, Circular Road, Muzaffarnagar Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1), Saharanpur
 Rajasugumar Subramani vs. ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
 PCIT vs. Pinaki D. Panani (Bombay High Court)
 Alodie Estates Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi Vs. The ACIT, Central Circle 2, Room No.363, 3rd Floor, E- 2, ARA Centre, Jhandewalan Extn., New Delhi – 110 055.
 M/s. Nutek India Ltd., New Delhi Vs. ACIT, Circle – 18 (2), Delhi.
 P. P. Mahatme, POA Lorna Margaret Pinto vs. ACIT (Bombay High Court)
  17 LPA-Opening Chief Manager Accounts-chartered Accountant - CA
  90 LPA-Opening Chartered Accountant / Finance Manager/ Financial Officers

Clarion Power Corp vs. Commissioner Of Customs (CESTAT)
June, 30th 2017

Strictures passed against Advocate for making frivolous arguments without having the file and wasting the valuable time of the Court. Costs imposed

IN THE CESTAT, SOUTH ZONAL BENCH, CHENNAI

Justice Dr. Satish Chandra, President and Shri. Madhu Mohan Damodhar Member (T)

CLARION POWER CORPORATION LTD.

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS,TUTICORIN

Interim Order No. 3/2017, dated 17.01.2017 in Appeal No. C/126/2007-DB

Shri. Selvakumar, Advocate, for the Appellant
Shri. K. Veerbhadra Reddy, JC (AR) for the Respondent.

Order per Justice Dr. Satich Chandra, President

Shri. M. Selvakumar, learned counsel has made frivolous argument without having the file or and document in his hand. He has wasted the valuable time of the court. He also made a request for adjournment.

2. This as a fit care where the Bench may recommend to Tamilnadu Bar Council to take appropriate action against him. But, by keeping a lenient view in mind, we adjourn the case at the cost of Rs. 1,000/-(Rupees on thousand only) which will deposited by the counsel toward Prime Minister’s Relief Fund within three days from today. On the next date of hearing, proof of deposit shall be submitted.

3. List the case for final hearing on 6.2.2017

(Dictated and pronounced in open Court)

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2020 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting