News shortcuts: From the Courts | Top Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | Professional Updates | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Professional Updates »
 Exposure Draft of Guidance Note on Report under Section 92E of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Transfer Pricing) (comments to be received by 30th June, 2020
  Appeal to Contribute in ICAI Covid 19 Relief Fund
 Announcement on Changing Prospective Restoration to Retrospective Restoration
 Maharashtra Govt. issues clarification on GST Appeals in regard to Non-Constitution of Appellate Tribunal
 Re-Opening of On-Line Facility (Correction Window) for Seeking Change of Examination Centre for Appearing in July 2020 CA Examinations
 Postponement of Special Examination for Members of Institutions with whom ICAI had entered into Mutual Recognition Agreement (MRAs) / Memorandum of Understanding (MOUs), June 2020
 Subsequent Events - Key Audit Considerations amid COVID-19
 ICAI launches Website to deal with Disciplinary Mechanism of Chartered Accountants
 Extension of time period for commencement of Practical Training on or before 31st May, 2020 to 31st July, 2020 for appearing in Final examination to be held in November, 2022.
 Relaxations for the Companies and LLPs to make good any filing related defaults, irrespective of duration of default, and make a fresh start as a fully compliant entity by 30th September, 2020.
 Mock Test Papers Series-I for July, 2020 examination - Final Course (Old Scheme)

Centre, state tax officials at loggerheads over GST
June, 03rd 2016

As the government struggles to get the Opposition on board for the passage of the Constitution Amendment Bill for the goods and services tax (GST) in the Rajya Sabha, Central and state revenue officials are engaged in a turf war over the unified indirect tax regime.

The administrative concerns, if not ironed out, may significantly dent the ease of ease of doing business objective of the key reform resulting in harassment of taxpayers and rise in litigation, according to experts.

Central revenue officers are concerned that states want control over taxes and assessments, rendering the Central Board of Excise and Customs toothless.

STILL A LONG ROAD AHEAD
Central revenue officers are concerned that states want control over taxes and assessments, rendering the Central Board of Excise and Customs toothless

States, including Gujarat, Maharashtra, West Bengal, Tamil Nadu and Karnataka, are pressing for authority over tax assessments and dispute resolution for entities with annual turnover of up to Rs 1.5 crore

This essentially means most service tax cases will move out of the Centre's domain

"There are administrative concerns over the GST that may result in a rise in litigation and harassment of taxpayers. The GST may end up with the worst rules from state laws and central laws," said an official who did not wish to be named.

"States are striking off almost all our recommendations at the GST meetings," he added.

Gujarat, Maharashtra, West Bengal, Tamil Nadu and Karnataka are pressing for authority over tax assessment and dispute resolution for entities with an annual turnover of up to Rs 1.5 crore. This essentially means most service tax cases will move out of the Centre's domain. "Almost all service tax cases barring those of big companies will go to the states," added another official.

However, cases over the Rs 1.5 crore threshold, there will likely be dual authority, with both states and centre having the power of assessment.

"It is unfair that states want exclusive rights over Central GST (SGST), State GST (SGST) and Integrated GST (IGST) up to Rs 1.5 crore. Nothing is exclusive for the Centre beyond the limit also," he said.

States also want to extend revisionary powers. Senior central revenue officers can now revoke orders passed by juniors within three months, against up to infinity in some states. The move could lead to a rise in uncertainty for tax assessees. "Some things are good in central Acts and some in state Acts. The Centre has a better system of review," an official said.

Parity is another contentious issue. "Chief commissioners have a service of 30-32 years against 16-17 years for state commissioners. How can they be put at par?" another official said. In Maharashtra, the Centre has seven chief commissioners and 30-40 commissioners, but one commissioner from the states.

"If a joint commissioner from the state and commissioner from the Centre pass orders on the same case, whose will hold?" argued another officer.

"Our intake of officers is 200 each year. What will happen to them if service tax is no more in our domain?" an official said.

"These are valid points. The litigation level will go up with each authority taking a different view. These need to be sorted before the GST comes into effect," said Saloni Roy, senior director, Deloitte.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2020 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting