News shortcuts: From the Courts | Top Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | Professional Updates | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Mergers and Acquisitions »
 Deals of the day-Mergers and acquisitions January 6, 2020
 Mergers and Acquisitions in Vietnam – Latest Issue of Vietnam Briefing Magazine
 Deals of the day-Mergers and acquisitions December 17, 2019
 Deals of the day-Mergers and acquisitions December 11, 2019
 Deals of the day-Mergers and acquisitions December 6, 2019
 Mergers and acquisitions up in 2019 but deal sizes are shrinking
 Global economic uncertainties dampen India's M&A activity in August
  M&A deals more than halve to $41.6 bn in January-June
 India Lithium-ion Battery Market Key Developments, Mergers and Acquisitions, Market Players, Forecast Analysis
 Deals Of The Day-Mergers And Acquisitions November 28 2019
 Merger & acquisitions and FDI transactions will improve in India: Jonathan Garner, Morgan Stanley

Female members on corporate boards can lower number of mergers and acquisitions
June, 08th 2016

Does female membership on corporate boards impact mergers and acquisitions? As the percentage of females on boards of America's largest companies has risen from 15 percent in 2005 to 20 percent in 2015, the question is relevant to today's decision makers.

University of Notre Dame researcher Craig Crossland, management professor at the Mendoza College of Business, and colleagues decided to look into the numbers. After studying almost 3,000 acquisitions between 1998 and 2010, they found that the larger the proportion of women on a board of a U.S. public company, the fewer acquisitions it engages in.

"We found that this effect existed even if we looked at firms with a single female director on the board," Crossland said. "A change in female board representation from low to high levels was associated with an 18 percent decrease in acquisitiveness, a 12 percent decrease in acquisition size and a reduction of $97.2 million in merger and acquisition spending in a given year."

Crossland and his colleagues surmise that increasing the proportion of female directors changes the dynamics of intra-board interactions.

"Groups comprised of distinct categories of people operate differently than groups where everyone shares similar characteristics," Crossland said. "Diverse groups tend to engage in discussions that are more thorough, more contentious and more likely to identify problems with the topic at hand. Mergers and acquisitions can be beneficial for firms, but at least as often, they can destroy value. We think the boards with higher female representation are more likely to identify these challenges in a given deal, increasing the likelihood that it will be delayed or shelved entirely."

Crossland emphasized that the researchers are not making any claims that female directors differ from male directors in terms of dispositional tendencies such as risk-taking propensity or openness to experience.

"The research on this is pretty sparse and we think it's safer to assume that the nature of board-level interactions is different," he said.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2020 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting