Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link:
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Popular Search: empanelment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: VAT Audit :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: TDS :: cpt :: VAT RATES :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: form 3cd :: due date for vat payment :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company
From the Courts »
 ACIT vs. Epson India Pvt. Ltd (Karnataka High Court)
 Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi Vs. M/s. Maruti Udyog Ltd
 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax - 6 Vs. M/s. Mohan Export India Private Limited
 Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 Vs. Oriental International Co. Pvt. Ltd.
 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 Vs. British Motor Car Co.(1934) Ltd
  Vidyadayani Shiksha Samiti vs. CIT (ITAT Delhi)
 Halcrow Consulting India Pvt. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
 ACIT vs. TRN Energy Pvt. Ltd (ITAT Delhi)
 Aditya Chemicals Ltd vs. ITO (ITAT Delhi)
 Gayatri Aggarwal Vs. Income Tax Commissioner & Ors.
 Paradigm Geophysical Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax (International Taxation)-3, New Delhi

Sh. Deepak Dhar Gupta, B-1, Extn/A-41, Mohan Cooperative Indl. Estate, New Delhi-110044. Vs. ITO, Ward-22(2), New Delhi.
June, 09th 2015
                     DELHI BENCH: `B' NEW DELHI


                          I.T.A .No.-3774/Del/2013
                        (ASSESSMENT YEAR-2009-10)

     Sh. Deepak Dhar Gupta,              vs ITO,
     B-1, Extn/A-41,                        Ward-22(2),
     Mohan Cooperative Indl. Estate,        New Delhi.
     New Delhi-110044.
     (APPELLANT)                            (RESPONDENT)

             Appellant by     None
             Respondent by    Smt. Parwinder Kaur, Sr. DR

                     Date of Hearing          04.06.2015
                  Date of Pronouncement       05.06.2015


      The present appeal has been filed by the assessee assailing the
correctness of the    order dated 26.04.2013 of CIT(A)-XXIII, New Delhi
pertaining to 2009-10 assessment year.
2. However, at the time of hearing, no one was present on behalf of the assessee. The appeal accordingly was passed over. In the second round also, the position remained the same. The record shows that notice for the specific date of hearing has been sent to the assessee on 23.05.2015. A perusal of the record shows that the appeal last came up for hearing on 12.05.2014 on which date, none was present on behalf of the assessee and notice was issued to the assessee through RPAD. However, on the subsequent dates when the appeal was listed for hearing, the Bench was not functional. Considering the fact that on the two occasions when the appeal came up for hearing, the assessee has remained unrepresented despite issuance of notice nor any efforts appear to have been made to inform the Bench why the assessee is not represented. Accordingly in the absence of repeated non- I.T.A .No.-3774/Del/2013 representation or petition seeking time, it can be presumed that the assessee is not serious in pursuing the present appeal. In the circumstances, the only alternative left is to dismiss the appeal of the assessee in limine. Support is drawn from the order of the Tribunals in Commissioner of Income-Tax vs. Multi Plan India (P) Ltd.; 38 ITD 320 (Del) and Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT: 223 ITR 480 (M.P).
3. Before parting it is appropriate to add that in case the assessee is able to show that there was a reasonable cause for non-representation on the date of hearing then it may if so advised pray for a recall of this order and decisions on merits. Respectfully following the order of ITAT in the case of Multiplan (India) Pvt. Ltd. (supra), we hold the appeal to be unadmitted with the liberty to assessee to move appropriate application and correct the defect whatsoever in the memo about its address to ensure a proper hearing of the appeal. The said order was pronounced on the date of hearing itself in the open Court. 4. As a result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed. The order is pronounced in the open court on 05th of June 2015. Sd/- Sd/- (T.S.KAPOOR) (DIVA SINGH) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated: 05/06/2015 *Amit Kumar* Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(Appeals) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT NEW DELHI Page 2 of 2
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Wholesale Silver Jewelry

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions