Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: due date for vat payment :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: form 3cd :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: TDS :: cpt :: empanelment :: VAT Audit :: VAT RATES :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4%
 
 
From the Courts »
  Micro Spacematrix Solution P Ltd vs. ITO (ITAT Delhi)
 Micro Spacematrix Solution P Ltd vs. ITO (ITAT Delhi)
 CIT vs. Greenfield Hotels & Estates Pvt. Ltd (Bombay High Court)
 IndiaBulls Financial Services Ltd vs. DCIT (Delhi High Court)
 Maharao Bhim Singh of Kota vs. CIT (Supreme Court)
 Ravneet Takhar Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax Ix And Ors.
 Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax
 Formula One World Championship Limited Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax, International Taxation-3 And Anr.
 Commissioner Of Income Tax International Taxation-3 Delhi Vs. Formula One World Championship Ltd. And Anr.
 Reliance Communications Ltd vs. DDIT (ITAT Mumbai)
  Sushila Devi vs. CIT (Delhi High Court)

Sh. Deepak Dhar Gupta, B-1, Extn/A-41, Mohan Cooperative Indl. Estate, New Delhi-110044. Vs. ITO, Ward-22(2), New Delhi.
June, 09th 2015
               IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                     DELHI BENCH: `B' NEW DELHI

              BEFORE SMT DIVA SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER
                                 AND
                SH. T.S.KAPOOR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

                          I.T.A .No.-3774/Del/2013
                        (ASSESSMENT YEAR-2009-10)

     Sh. Deepak Dhar Gupta,              vs ITO,
     B-1, Extn/A-41,                        Ward-22(2),
     Mohan Cooperative Indl. Estate,        New Delhi.
     New Delhi-110044.
     PAN-ACNPG1164
     (APPELLANT)                            (RESPONDENT)

             Appellant by     None
             Respondent by    Smt. Parwinder Kaur, Sr. DR

                     Date of Hearing          04.06.2015
                  Date of Pronouncement       05.06.2015

                                  ORDER
PER DIVA SINGH, JM

      The present appeal has been filed by the assessee assailing the
correctness of the    order dated 26.04.2013 of CIT(A)-XXIII, New Delhi
pertaining to 2009-10 assessment year.
2. However, at the time of hearing, no one was present on behalf of the assessee. The appeal accordingly was passed over. In the second round also, the position remained the same. The record shows that notice for the specific date of hearing has been sent to the assessee on 23.05.2015. A perusal of the record shows that the appeal last came up for hearing on 12.05.2014 on which date, none was present on behalf of the assessee and notice was issued to the assessee through RPAD. However, on the subsequent dates when the appeal was listed for hearing, the Bench was not functional. Considering the fact that on the two occasions when the appeal came up for hearing, the assessee has remained unrepresented despite issuance of notice nor any efforts appear to have been made to inform the Bench why the assessee is not represented. Accordingly in the absence of repeated non- I.T.A .No.-3774/Del/2013 representation or petition seeking time, it can be presumed that the assessee is not serious in pursuing the present appeal. In the circumstances, the only alternative left is to dismiss the appeal of the assessee in limine. Support is drawn from the order of the Tribunals in Commissioner of Income-Tax vs. Multi Plan India (P) Ltd.; 38 ITD 320 (Del) and Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT: 223 ITR 480 (M.P).
3. Before parting it is appropriate to add that in case the assessee is able to show that there was a reasonable cause for non-representation on the date of hearing then it may if so advised pray for a recall of this order and decisions on merits. Respectfully following the order of ITAT in the case of Multiplan (India) Pvt. Ltd. (supra), we hold the appeal to be unadmitted with the liberty to assessee to move appropriate application and correct the defect whatsoever in the memo about its address to ensure a proper hearing of the appeal. The said order was pronounced on the date of hearing itself in the open Court. 4. As a result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed. The order is pronounced in the open court on 05th of June 2015. Sd/- Sd/- (T.S.KAPOOR) (DIVA SINGH) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated: 05/06/2015 *Amit Kumar* Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(Appeals) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT NEW DELHI Page 2 of 2
 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Wholesale Silver Jewelry

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions