Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: empanelment :: VAT Audit :: form 3cd :: TDS :: due date for vat payment :: cpt :: VAT RATES
 
 
From the Courts »
 Ravneet Takhar Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax Ix And Ors.
 Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax
 Formula One World Championship Limited Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax, International Taxation-3 And Anr.
 Commissioner Of Income Tax International Taxation-3 Delhi Vs. Formula One World Championship Ltd. And Anr.
 Reliance Communications Ltd vs. DDIT (ITAT Mumbai)
  Sushila Devi vs. CIT (Delhi High Court)
 Ashok Prapann Sharma vs. CIT (Supreme Court)a
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
 M.K.Overseas Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Pr.Commissioner Of Income Tax-06
 Arshia Ahmed Qureshi Vs. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-21

Madhusudan Buildcon Pvt. Ltd., F-6/5, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi. Vs. ACIT, Central Circle-17, Jhandewalan, New Delhi.
June, 16th 2015
      IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
          DELHI BENCHES : SMC : NEW DELHI

     BEFORE SHRI R.S. SYAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

                        ITA No.508/Del/2014
                      Assessment Year : 2006-07


Madhusudan Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.,       Vs.   ACIT,
F-6/5, Vasant Vihar,                       Central Circle-17,
New Delhi.                                 Jhandewalan,
                                           New Delhi.
PAN: AAECM1048H

  (Appellant)                                  (Respondent)

            Assessee By        :   Shri B.K. Dhingra, Director
            Department By      :   Shri Amrit Lal, JCIT

         Date of Hearing              :    15.06.2015
         Date of Pronouncement        :    15.06.2015

                               ORDER


     This appeal by the assessee arises out of the order passed by the

CIT (A) on 30.12.2013 in relation to the assessment year 2006-07.
                                                            ITA No.508/Del/2014


2.   The only issue argued by the ld. AR is against the sustenance of

addition of Rs.20,000/- made by the Assessing Officer u/s 40A(3) of the

Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called `the Act').




3.   Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessee is engaged

in real estate business. During the course of the year in question, it

entered into a joint venture with M/s Newera Sanitarware Pvt. Ltd. and

M/s Yah Softech Pvt. Ltd., for purchasing a plot of land admeasuring

121 kanals and 10 marlas, situated at Dehri Salam, Vaka Siwana Mouja

Dhankot, Tehsil and District Gurgaon. The assessee's share in the plot

is 25%. While entering into the Agreement for the purchase of property,

the three companies made an initial advance of Rs.35 lac. While making

such initial advance payment, a total cash payment of Rs.4 lac was also

made. The assessee's 25% share in such cash payment was at Rs.1 lac.

Such cash payment of Rs.1 lac was recorded by the assessee in its books

of account on 29.12.2005. It is a matter of record that some dispute

arose between the parties and the deal could not be finalized and the

same is still undecided. The AO invoked the provisions of section


                                    2
                                                          ITA No.508/Del/2014


40A(3) and made an addition of Rs.20,000/-, being 20% of Rs.1 lac

paid by the assessee in cash. The ld. CIT(A) upheld the addition.

4.   I have heard the rival submissions and perused the relevant

material available on record. A copy of the assessee's Trading, Profit &

loss account for the year in question is available on page 12 of the paper

book,   from which it can be seen that there is no income and the

expenses claimed as deduction are only to the tune of Rs.4,135/-. The

assessee paid a total sum of Rs.40 lac as advance of land at Dhankot

which was shown in the Balance sheet under the head `Loans &

Advances'. A copy of such Balance sheet is available at page 11 of the

paper book. It is from this total advance of Rs.40 lac paid by the

assessee that a sum of Rs.1 lac was paid in cash and the AO has invoked

the provisions of section 40A(3) for making disallowance @ 20% of

such cash payment.

5.   In order to appreciate the rival contentions on the applicability of

section 40A(3), it would be apposite to extract the relevant part of this

provision at the material time, as under:-

                                    3
                                                              ITA No.508/Del/2014


     "(3) Where the assessee incurs any expenditure in respect of which
     payment is made, after such date (not being later than 31st day of
     March, 1969), as may be specified in this behalf by the Central
     Government by notification in the Official Gazette in a sum exceeding
     twenty thousand rupees otherwise than by an account payee cheque
     drawn on a bank or account payee bank draft, twenty per cent of such
     expenditure shall not be allowed as a deduction ........"


6.   A careful perusal of this provision transpires that where the

`assessee incurs any expenditure in respect of which payment is made'

in a sum exceeding Rs.20,000/- otherwise than by account payee cheque

etc., then, twenty percent of the amount paid in cash is disallowable.

Thus, it becomes apparent that in order to invoke the provisions of

section 40A(3), it is sine qua non that the assessee must have incurred

expenditure in respect of which such payment is made in cash. Section

40A has the marginal note: `Expenses or payments not deductible in

certain circumstances'. This section has been placed under Chapter

IVD of the Act. Sub-section (1) of section 40A provides that : "The

provisions of this section shall have effect notwithstanding anything to

the contrary contained in any other provision of this Act relating to the

computation of income under the head "Profits and gains of business or

profession". A cursory look at the above provisions divulges that in
                                      4
                                                          ITA No.508/Del/2014


order to make any disallowance under section 40A(3), it is a pre-

condition that the assessee must have claimed deduction, directly or

indirectly, for which payment is made in cash exceeding the specified

limit. Per contra, if the assessee has not claimed any deduction, directly

or indirectly, even if the payment is made in cash, the provisions of the

computation of income under the head `Profits and gains of business or

profession' shall not apply to that extent and section 40A(3) will become

non-operative.




7.   I am confronted with a situation in which albeit the assessee made

payment of Rs.1 lac in cash towards advance for purchase of a piece of

land, but, no deduction was claimed for this sum. This amount has been

directly taken to the balance sheet and has been shown as advance under

the head `Loans and advances.' Under such circumstances, when there is

no claim for deduction of Rs.1lac, the provisions of section 40A(3)

cannot be attracted for making any disallowance for a sum of

Rs.20,000/- as this payment is not towards any `expenditure incurred'




                                    5
                                                                 ITA No.508/Del/2014


during the year and has not been claimed as deduction by the assessee.

I, therefore, order for the deletion of this addition.

8.        No other ground was argued by the ld. AR.              Such grounds,

therefore, stand dismissed as not pressed.

9.        In the result, the appeal is partly allowed.

          The order pronounced in the open court on 15.06.2015.


                                                                Sd/-
                                                      [R.S. SYAL]
                                                  ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Dated, 15th June, 2015.
dk
Copy forwarded to:
     1.   Appellant
     2.   Respondent
     3.   CIT
     4.   CIT (A)
     5.   DR, ITAT

                                                         AR, ITAT, NEW DELHI.




                                          6

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Wholesale Silver Jewelry

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions