sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Latest Expert Exchange
From the Courts »
 All India Federation of Tax Practitioners vs. ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
 uresh M. Jamkhindikar vs. ACIT (Bombay High Court)
  Suresh M. Jamkhindikar vs. ACIT (Bombay High Court)
 Mangammal @ Thulasi vs. T.B. Raju (Supreme Court)
 Mahabir Industries vs. PCIT (Supreme Court)
  Oriental Bank Of Commerce Vs. Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax
  Suresh M. Jamkhindikar vs. ACIT (Bombay High Court)
  Union of India vs. Pirthwi Singh (Supreme Court)
 Cromption Greaves Limited vs. CIT (ITAT Mumbai)
 Director Of Income Tax Vs. M/s. Modiluft Ltd.
 Director Of Income Tax Vs. M/s. Royal Airways Ltd.

ACIT, Central Circle-1, New Delhi Vs. M/s. Suncity Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. N-49, Connaught Place, New Delhi
June, 24th 2015
                DELHI BENCH `G', NEW DELHI
     Before Sh. George George K, JM And Sh. N. K. Saini, AM
             ITA No. 558/Del/2012 : Asstt. Year : 2006-07

ACIT, Central Circle-1,       Vs M/s. Suncity Infrastructure Pvt.
New Delhi                        Ltd.
                                 N-49, Connaught Place,
                                  New Delhi
                                 PAN : AAICS7928N
(APPELLANT)                      (RESPONDENT)
                                  PAN : AAICS7928N
           Assessee by : Sh. (DR) Vijay Chaddha, Sr. DR
           Revenue by : Sh. Ved Jain, CA
Date of Hearing : 22. 06.2015       Date of Pronouncement : 22.06.2015



      This appeal by the Department is directed against the order
dated 25.11.2011 of the Ld. CIT(A)-III, New Delhi.

2.    The grounds raised in the appeal of the Department read as

     "1. On the facts and circumstances of the case Ld. CIT(A)
     has erred in law and on facts in deleting the addition of Rs.
     10,40,000/- made by the AO on account of unexplained cash
     deposited in bank.
     2. The order of the CIT(A) is erroneous and not is tenable in
        law and on facts.
                                 2                    ITA No.558/Del/2012

     3. The appellant craves leave to add, alter or amend any/all
        of the grounds of appeal before or during the course of
        hearing of the appeal."

3.    During the course of hearing, the Learned counsel for
the assessee at the very outset stated that the tax effect in
this appeal is less than Rs.4,00,000/-, therefore, the
department ought not to have filed this appeal in view of the
circular issued by the CBDT and the provisions contained in
Section 268A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter to
be referred as the Act).

4.    On the other hand, the ld. D.R., although supported the
order of the Assessing Officer, but could not controvert this
fact that tax effect in this appeal is less than Rs.4,00,000/-.

5.    After considering the submissions of the ld. D.R. and
the material on record, it is noticed that Section 268A has
been inserted by the Finance Act, 2008 with retrospective
effect from 01/04/99. The provisions contained in section
268A read as under:

     "268A. (1) The Board may, from time to time, issue
     orders, instructions or directions to other income-tax
     authorities, fixing such monetary limits as it may
     deem fit, for the purpose of regulating filing of
     appeal or application for reference by any income-
     tax authority under the provisions of this Chapter.
                          3                 ITA No.558/Del/2012

(2) Where, in pursuance of the orders, instructions or
directions issued under sub-section (1), an income-
tax authority has not filed any appeal or application
for reference on any issue in the case of an assessee
for any assessment year, it shall not preclude such
authority from filing an appeal or application for
reference on the same issue in the case of--

(a) the same assessee for any other assessment
    year; or
(b) any other assessee for the same or any other
assessment year.
(3) Notwithstanding that no appeal or application for
reference has been filed by an income-tax authority
pursuant to the orders or instructions or directions
issued under sub-section (1), it shall not be lawful
for an assessee, being a party in any appeal or
reference, to contend that the income-tax authority
has acquiesced in the decision on the disputed issue
by not filing an appeal or application for reference
in any case.

(4) The Appellate Tribunal or Court, hearing such
appeal or reference, shall have regard to the orders,
instructions or directions issued under sub-section
(1) and the circumstances under which such appeal
or application for reference was filed or not filed in
respect of any case.

(5) Every order, instruction or direction which has
been issued by the Board fixing monetary limits for
filing an appeal or application for reference shall be
deemed to have been issued under sub-section (1)
                              4                  ITA No.558/Del/2012

     and the provisions of sub-sections (2), (3) and (4)
     shall apply accordingly.]"

6.    It is not in dispute that the Board's instruction or
directions issued to the income-tax authorities are binding
on those authorities, therefore, the department ought not to
have filed the appeal in view of the above said provisions
mentioned in section 268A of the Act since the tax effect in
the instant case is less than the amount prescribed for not
filing the appeal.

7.    It is noticed that the CBDT has issued Instruction No.5
of 2014 dated 10.07.2014, by which the CBDT has revised
the monetary limit to Rs. 4,00,000/-    for filing the appeal
before the Tribunal.

8.    Keeping in view the CBDT Instruction No.5 of 2014
dated 10.07.2014 and also the provisions of Section 268A of
Income Tax Act, 1961, we are of the view that the Revenue
should not have filed the instant appeal before the Tribunal.
While taking such a view, we are fortified by the following
decisions of Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court:-

     1. CIT v Oscar Laboratories P. Ltd (2010) 324 ITR
     115 (P&H)
     2. CIT v Abinash Gupta (2010) 327 ITR 619 (P&H)
                               5                   ITA No.558/Del/2012

     3. CIT v Varindera Construction Co. (2011) 331 ITR
     449 (P&H)(FB)

9.    Similarly the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of
CIT v. Delhi Race Club Ltd. in ITA No.128/2008, order
dated 03.03.2011 by following the earlier order dated
02.08.2010 in ITA No.179/1991 in the case of CIT Delhi-III
v. M/s. P.S. Jain & Co. held that such circular would also be
applicable to pending cases.

10. From the ratio laid down by the Hon'ble Delhi High
Court, it is clear that the instructions issued in the Circulars
by CBDT are applicable for pending cases also. Therefore,
by keeping in view the ratio laid down in the aforesaid
referred to cases, we are of the considered view that
Instruction No.5/14 dated 10.07.2014 issued by the CBDT
are applicable for the pending cases also and in the said
instructions, monetary tax limit for not filing the appeal
before the ITAT is Rs. 4.00 lakhs.

11. In view of the above, without going into merits of the
case, we dismiss the appeal filed by the Revenue.

12. In the result, appeal of the Revenue stand dismissed.
(Order Pronounced in the Court on 22 /06/2015).
                      6            ITA No.558/Del/2012

         Sd/-                   Sd/-
  (George George K)          (N. K. Saini)
Dated: 22 /06/2015
Copy forwarded to:
1. Appellant
2. Respondent
3. CIT
4. CIT(Appeals)
                            ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
                                          7                             ITA No.558/Del/2012

                                                     Date     Initial
1.    Draft dictated on                          22/06/2015
2.    Draft placed before author                 22/06/2015
3.    Draft proposed & placed before the
      second member
4.    Draft discussed/approved by Second
5.    Approved Draft comes to the Sr.PS/PS
6.    Kept for pronouncement on
7.    File sent to the Bench Clerk
8.    Date on which file goes to the AR
9.    Date on which file goes to the Head Clerk.
10.   Date of dispatch of Order.
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Content Management System development CMS development Content Management Solutions CMS Solutions Content Management Services CMS Services CMS Software

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions