sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Latest Expert Exchange
From the Courts »
 GE Energy Parts Inc vs. CIT (Delhi High Court)
 PCIT vs. Perfect Circle India Pvt. Ltd (Bombay High Court)
 Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. Plot No. 1, Nelson Mandela Road, Vasant Kunj, vs. DCIT, Circle- 16(1), Room No. 312, C.R. Building New Delhi.
 Smt. Ritu Malik T-236, DB Gupta Road, Phara Ganj, New Delhi – 110055 vs. ITO, Ward – 62 (5) New Delhi
 Fluor Daniel India Pvt. Ltd. B 9, LGF Green Park (Main) New Delhi 110 016 vs. ACIT Circle 9(1), Room No.194 C.R.building I.P.Estate New Delhi
 DCIT, Circle-2, Meerut. vs. Reeta Singhal, A-312, Prahlad Vatika, Khair Nagar, Meerut.
 Contata Solutions Pvt.Ltd. A-16/9, Vasant Vihar New Delhi 110 057 vs. ITO, Ward 6(3), Room No.376A Central Revenue Building I.P.Estate New Delhi 110 002
 Late Sh. D. K. Jain Through Legal Hier Mrs. Usha Jain D-19, Nizamuddin East New Delhi vs. DCIT Circle-32(1) New Delhi.
 Shri Neeraj Puri 74-C, Rajpur Road Dehradun Vs. The Pr. C.I.T Dehradun
 Ashok Kumar S/o Sh. Hari Kishan Hingo Kheri, Kandela D- Shamli vs. ITO, Ward – 1 (4) Shamli
 Satish Kumar, Rra Taxindia, D-28, South Extension, Part-I, New Delhi – 49 Vs. Ito, Ward 2(3), Faridabad

Ms. Neeta Prakash Ahuja Income Tax Officer - 21(2)(3) 1/141,Nagar Sion-Koliwada Mumbai 400037 Vs. Pratyakshkar Bhavan Bandra Kurla Complex Mumbai 400051
June, 25th 2014
               IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                          "B" Bench, Mumbai

                Before Shri D. Manmohan, Vice President
               and Shri Sanjay Arora, Accountant Member

                           MA No. 33/Mum/2014
                  (Arising out of ITA No. 8735/Mum/2010)
                         (Assessment Year: 2002-03)

      Ms. Neeta Prakash Ahuja       Income Tax Officer - 21(2)(3)
      1/141, New S.S.S. Nagar       Pratyakshkar Bhavan
                                Vs.
      Sion-Koliwada                 Bandra Kurla Complex
      Mumbai 400037                 Mumbai 400051
                          PAN - AACPA2241J
              Applicant                     Respondent

                   Applicant by:      Shri M. Subramanian
                   Respondent by:     Shri Satyanarayan Raju

                   Date of Hearing:       20.062014
                   Date of Pronouncement: 20.06.2014

                                  ORDER

Per D. Manmohan, V.P.

     By this miscellaneous application the assessee seeks recall of the
exparte order dated 22nd January, 2013 on the ground that on account of
inadvertent typographical error the address of the assessee was mentioned
as 1/4 S.S.S. Nagar instead of 1/141, S.S.S. Nagar, which resulted in non-
receipt of the notice issued by the Registry resulting in non-appearance on
the part of the assessee. It was also contended that the assessee is very
much interested in pursuing the appeal and, therefore, under Rule 24 of the
Appellate Tribunal Rules requested for recall of the exparte order.






2.    We have heard both the parties and perused the record. Having regard
to the circumstances of the case we are of the view that it is a fit case for
recall of the exparte order under Rule 24 of the Appellate Tribunal Rules.
Accordingly we recall the order and direct the Registry to post the appeal for
fresh hearing on 29.10.2014. Since the date is announced in the open court,
notice to the parties is dispensed with.
                                         2                   MA No. 33/Mum/2014
                                                           Ms. Neeta Prakash Ahuja

3.        In the result, the miscellaneous application filed by the assessee is
allowed.






Order pronounced in the open court on 20th June, 2014.

                    Sd/-                                   Sd/-
               (Sanjay Arora)                         (D. Manmohan)
            Accountant Member                         Vice President

Mumbai, Dated:20th June, 2014

Copy to:

     1.   The   Appellant
     2.   The   Respondent
     3.   The   CIT(A) ­ 32, Mumbai
     4.   The   CIT­ 21, Mumbai City
     5.   The   DR, "B" Bench, ITAT, Mumbai
                                                        By Order

//True Copy//
                                                     Assistant Registrar
                                             ITAT, Mumbai Benches, Mumbai
n.p.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2019 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Content Management System development CMS development Content Management Solutions CMS Solutions Content Management Services CMS Services CMS Software

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions