Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
Popular Search: VAT Audit :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: cpt :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: due date for vat payment :: VAT RATES :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: TDS :: empanelment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: form 3cd :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company
« From the Courts »
 Group M. Media India Pvt. Ltd vs. UOI (Bombay High Court)
 Shreemati Devi vs. CIT (Allahabad High Court)
 Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
  Dr. Gautam Sen vs. CCIT (Bombay High Court)
 Dr. Gautam Sen vs. CCIT (Bombay High Court)
 DCIT vs. Shivshankar R. Sharma (ITAT Mumbai)
 ACIT vs. Jawaharlal Agicha (ITAT Mumbai)
 CIT vs. M/s. D. Chetan & Co (Bombay High Court)
 Makes further amendments to Notification no. 157/90-Customs dated 28th March, 1990 regarding temporary admission under the ATA Carnet
 Appointment of Common Adjudicating Authority by DGRI - 2/2016-Customs
 ransfers Of Hon’ble Members Of The ITAT (September 2016)

Calibre Infin Lease Services Ltd. 204-205, Ansal Imperial Tower C Block Community Centre Naraina Vihar New Delhi 110 028 Vs. ITO, Ward 3(2) New Delhi
June, 19th 2014
                    DELHI BENCHES : "B" NEW DELHI

                     BEFORE SHRI U.B.S.BEDI, JM AND
                      SHRI J.SUDHAKAR REDDY, AM

                               ITA No: 2280/Del/2013
                                   AY : - 2003-04

Calibre Infin Lease Services Ltd.      vs.    ITO, Ward 3(2)
C/o SS Poddar & Co.                           New Delhi
204-205, Ansal Imperial Tower
C Block Community Centre
Naraina Vihar
New Delhi 110 028

(Appellant)                                  (Respondent)

              Appellant by : Shri Arvind Pathak (Employee of company)
                   Respondent by: Shri Gagan Sood, Sr.D.R.



       This appeal is filed by the assessee    directed against the order of the

Ld.CIT(Appeals)-VI, New Delhi dt. 20.2.2013 pertaining to the Assessment Year

2003-04, on the following grounds.

            "1. The Ld.CIT (A) is erred in law and on facts in confirming addition
            of Rs.5,02,500/- on account of share application money and
            presumed commission.
            2. No notice of hearing was received by the appellant. Appellate
            order was received by the appellant but none of the notices dated
            7.6.2011, 2.8.2011 and 30.1.2013 as stated by the Ld.CIT (A) was
                                                                     Page 2 of 3

           received by the appellant. Ex parte order passed by the Ld.CIT (A)
           is unjustified and unlawful as no notice of hearing was served on the
           appellant company."

2.    When the case was called up for hearing, the assessee moved an

adjournment application.     On consideration of the same we are of the

considered opinion that this is not a fit case to grant adjournment. Hence the

same is rejected.

3.    After hearing the Ld.D.R. Mr.Gagan Sood, we find that the principles of

natural justice are not complied with by the Ld.CIT(Appeals)-IV, New Delhi. The

assessee's case is that    no notice of hearing was received by it from the

Ld.CIT(Appeals).    In fact a prayer was made that the Office of the

Ld.CIT(Appeals) demonstrate that a notice has been served on the assessee

intimating the date of hearing before the Ld.CIT(Appeals). The Revenue could

not demonstrate that the notices referred to at para 4 of the Ld.CIT(Appeals)'s

order were served on the assessee. Under the circumstances, we are of the

considered opinion that the appeal should be set aside to the file of the

Ld.CIT(Appeals) for fresh adjudication in accordance with law, after affording

adequate opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The assessee is directed to

approach the Office of the Ld.CIT(Appeals) and obtain the notice of date of

                                                                         Page 3 of 3

4.    In the result the appeal is treated as allowed for statistical purposes.
       Order pronounced in the Open Court on 13th June,2014.

             Sd/-                                          Sd/-

       (U.B.S.BEDI)                            (J.SUDHAKAR REDDY)
     JUDICIAL MEMBER                           ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

Dated: the 13th June, 2014


Copy of the Order forwarded to:
6.Guard File

                                                           By Order

                                                          Asst. Registrar
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Publishing Management System PMS News Management System Publishing Management System Development Online News Management System for media company custom Publishing management system development Survey management system Market Res

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions