Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: empanelment :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: cpt :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: TDS :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: due date for vat payment :: form 3cd :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: VAT RATES :: VAT Audit
 
 
« Budget Extravaganza »
 Government should reinstate wealth tax in Budget 2017
 With demonetisation inducing tax compliance will PM Modi cut tax rates in Budget 2017?
 State plan budget utilisation in Odisha
 Maharashtra wants budget advanced to February
 Coastal economic zones may get 10-year tax exemption in next Budget
 Why advancing the Union Budget date may not make much difference
 Govt keen 2017-18 budget should not clash with polls: Arun Jaitley
 Finance Ministry seeks industry suggestions on taxation for Budget
 Budget should focus on fiscal firm up
 Finance ministry keen to present Budget on February 2 or earlier
 Poor railway performance may mar merged Budget

Budget expectations for changes in tax rules
June, 05th 2014

With the new government having come to power on a manifesto promising less government interference and better services to the public, the expectations from the public regarding tax changes in the forthcoming budget are running high. While many taxpayers are clamouring for an increase in the basic tax exemption to offset the impact of inflation, there are other far more vexatious provisions that the new government needs to reconsider. While most of these provisions pertain to businesses, such as domestic transfer pricing, taxation of premium received on issue of shares, retrospective amendments regarding indirect transfer of shares by foreign companies, and others, there are a few provisions that result in harassment of the common man.

One such provision relates to taxation of the difference between the stamp duty valuation and the actual purchase price of an immovable property, as the income of the purchaser. This provision effectively presumes that the purchaser has paid black money if there is a difference of more than Rs.50,000 between these two values and, therefore, taxes the difference. In other words, it presumes that all taxpayers who acquire property at a lower price are tax evaders. It does not factor in the fact that a sale may be a distress sale, or that an adverse location or defective title of the property has depressed the value, besides various other factors which may have affected the valuation of the property.

Taxpayers have to go through the harassment of an assessment, a valuation by the departmental valuation officer and invariably end up in a series of appeals, involving substantial cost and tension, before they are able to prove that the price at which the property was purchased was genuinely the fair market price, which was lower than the stamp duty valuation.

Through another provision, section 50C, the seller also goes through the same harassment to ensure that she, too, is not taxed on the same difference. If the intention of the law is not to harass taxpayers, these sections need a relook.

The second big area of litigation faced by many individual taxpayers relates to the exemption for reinvestment of long-term capital gains in a residential house. Often, taxpayers buy more than one flat, which are adjacent to each other, to claim the exemption, and to facilitate any subsequent transfer of assets among their children. In such cases, they invariably face litigation from tax authorities, who claim that the benefit is available only for one flat since the law refers to acquisition of a house, even though the taxpayer may be using both the flats in a combined manner as one house for the entire family. Since the purpose of this exemption is to encourage construction and purchase of residential housing, there is no need for any restriction on the number of residential houses that a person may reinvest in to claim the capital gains exemption. A clarification is required in the law for this purpose.

The third and most significant area of harassment that taxpayers face is in relation to getting credit for taxes deducted at source and getting their tax refunds in time. The government has introduced a computerized system for grant of tax credit, and issued instructions to assessing officers to carry out rectifications. Yet, taxpayers are made to run from pillar to post to try and get full credit for tax deducted at source from their income. This is one area where, besides the law, the systems and procedures, too, need a thorough relook.

Taxpayers are promised refunds within four months under a Citizen’s Charter, but refunds are still withheld till beyond the end of the financial year, eight months later. Even then, many refunds are adjusted against fictitious demands, which the tax authorities ostensibly do not find time to correct. The government should either reduce the scope of tax deduction at source—which it has significantly expanded in the past few years—if it is not able to give credit for all such taxes collected, or it should give full credit in time.

We clearly need a fairer tax system, and not one in which there is no accountability of tax authorities, while taxpayers are made to run around and penalized for minor defaults. Tax officials, too, should be penalized for harassing taxpayers, so as to discourage such behaviour.

One hopes that the new finance minister will not only look at the amendments to be made in the law in the forthcoming budget, which will help businesses unleash their potential, but also provide some relief to harried taxpayers in the form of an improved tax administration.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Achievements

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions