sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Latest Expert Exchange
From the Courts »
 Shri Amar Nath Goenka, New Delhi – 110 070. vs. The ACIT, Circle-20(1), New Delhi.
 M/s KSD Charitable Trust, C/o Ganesh Cold, Storage, Meerut VS. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1,
 Avaya India Pvt. Ltd. 202, Platina, 2nd Floor, Plot No. C-59, G-Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (E), Mumbai, Maharashtra. vs. Addl. Cit Special Range-1 New Delhi.
 Sita Bhagi 83, Sukhdev Vihar, New Delhi. vs. ACIT Circle 65(1) New Delhi.
 ACIT vs. Janak Global Resources Pvt. Ltd (ITAT Chandigarh)
 DCIT vs. Rakesh Saraogi & Sons (HUF) (ITAT Raipur)
 FIS Global Business Solutions India Pvt. Ltd vs. PCIT (Delhi High Court)
 DCIT International Taxation, Circle-Noida, Aayakar Bhawan, Sector-24, Noida vs. Jaypee Sports International Ltd., Sector-128, Noida.
 Nokia India Pvt. Ltd., 1st Floor, Tower A, SP Infocity, Industrial Plot No. 243, Udyog Vihar, Phase-1, Dundahera, Gurgaon, Haryana vs. DCIT, Circle 13 (1) New Delhi
 Sh. Nafe Singh Gahlawat, H. No. 1032, Sector-14, Faridabad vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-II(3), Faridabad
 Dr. Ashok Seth, B-30, Geetanjali Enclave, New Delhi. vs. ACIT, Circle-61(1), New Delhi.

Calcutta high court strikes down Bengal entry tax as unconstitutional
June, 25th 2013

In a major setback for the Mamata Banerjee government, Calcutta high court on Monday struck down the entry tax on commodities imported from other states, which has been showcased as one of the achievements of the Trinamool Congress government since it was imposed in April 2012.


The order will have serious repercussions on the state's finances - cash-strapped Bengal stands to lose Rs 1,200 crore a year. The court has granted a six-week stay, allowing the government to move a division bench. The Mamata government had faced similar embarrassment a year ago when a division bench of the high court called the Singur Land Act "unconstitutional and void."

In her 100-page order Justice Indira Banerji said on Monday that the 'West Bengal Tax on Entry of Goods into Local Areas Act, 2012' is unconstitutional because the state Act doesn't have the President's assent. The preceding Left Front government had sent the entry tax proposal for the President's assent in 2003 but didn't pursue it after 2010.

With Bengal's treasury in a desperate condition, finance minister Amit Mitra introduced entry tax in 2012. He hailed its contribution to the state's revenue but a group of business houses and traders moved high court, challenging the validity of the Act. While presenting his 2013-14 budget on March 15, Mitra had assured the assembly that there was no need to obtain presidential assent for compensatory entry tax. But the high court has ruled otherwise.

The Left Front government had scrapped entry tax 17 years before Mitra introduced it as a 1% levy on consignments from outside valued above Rs 25,000. During the passage of the entry tax bill in the House on March 31, 2012, Mitra had said the levy was designed to be "compensatory in nature", and that the entire tax shall go to a "dedicated fund" to boost infrastructure - building of roads, bridges, linking of markets, setting up storage facilities and supply of electricity and water to industries and commercial complex.

But during its submission in court, the state government couldn't quantify the benefits to local area trade and commerce as mentioned in the purpose of the Bill. Justice Banerji held that the tax wasn't compensatory in nature. The Supreme Court had laid down the guidelines for introducing such a compensatory entry tax (Jindal Stainless Ltd Vs the State of Haryana) to make the government accountable for beefing up infrastructure.

The SC guidelines provide that entry tax should be a compensatory tax till such time as it is required to improve infrastructure such as roads, markets and power, and the proceeds of the tax have to be utilized exclusively for the development of trade, commerce and industry and the activities specified. The fund cannot be utilised for other purposes, the apex court held.

Sensing the legal implication, Mitra took care to set up a "Compensatory Entry Tax Fund" for upgrading infrastructure. He also named the fund carefully because the Karnataka high court had struck down a plea of imposing entry tax in Bangalore on the ground it was restricting free movement of commodities. The same plea was taken in the court while contesting the Entry Tax Act.

Legal setbacks for govt in Calcutta high court

1. June 22, 2012: Singur Land Act struck down as 'unconstitutional and void'

2. Feb 19, 2013: CBI probe ordered into the Gurap rehab home rape-murders

3. May 10, June 13, 2013: Primacy of State Election Commission upheld in the conduct of panchayat polls

4. May 13, 2013: CBI inquiry ordered into Dhaniakhali custodial death

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Customer relationship management software CRM software Operational CRM Collaborative CRM

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions