Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: TDS :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: VAT RATES :: empanelment :: due date for vat payment :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: form 3cd :: VAT Audit :: cpt :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: list of goods taxed at 4%
 
 
From the Courts »
 The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 Vs. Inter Globe Technology Quotient Pvt. Ltd.
 Akum Drugs And Pharmaceuticals Limited Through: Director Shri. Sanjeev Jain Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(1) & Anr.
 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-2 New Delhi Vs. Meeta Gutgutia Prop. M/s Ferns „n? Petals
 Prabhatam Investment Pvt. Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
 CIT vs. Laxman Industrial Resources Pvt.Ltd (Delhi High Court)
  State Of Jharkhand vs. Lalu Prasad Yadav (Supreme Court)
 CIT vs. Krishan K. Aggarwal (Supreme Court)
 Ambuja Cements Ltd. Vs. Commissioner, Service Tax Commissionerate, Delhi
 Director Of Income Tax (Exemptions) Vs. Vishwa Hindu Parishad
 ITAT Proposes Important Changes To Tribunal Rules
 Meherjee Cassinath Holdings Pvt. Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)

The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,Central Circle-I,Madurai. Vs. Smt. Kala Karmegam,343, East Street,Anna Nagar, Madurai.
June, 18th 2012
                      IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,
                              MUMBAI BENCH I' BENCH

              BEFORE SHRI B.R.MITTAL(JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND
                 SHRI N.K.BILLAIYA (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER)

                               ITA No.4898/Mum/2010
                             Assessment Year: 2006 -07

Jiny Textiles Pvt Ltd.,                     Income Tax Officer 10(2)(4),
9A/104, Neelam Nagar Phase-II,              Mumbai
Prataprao Gujjr Marg,
Mulund(E), Mumbai-81                 Vs.
PA No .AABCJ 4226 B

(Appellant)                                 (Respondent)


                            Appellant by : None
                            Respondent by: Shri Parthasarthi Naik

Date of hearing:             7.6.2012
Date of pronouncement:        15. 6.2012

                                   ORDER

Per B.R.Mittal, JM:

       The assessee has filed this appeal for assessment year 2006-07 against order
dated 29.3.2010 of ld CIT(A)-21, Mumbai.


2.     We observe that ld CIT(A) has dismissed the appeal of assessee, which was
barred by limitation. Ld CIT(A) has stated that assessee has not requested condonation
of delay nor any explanation was filed for delay in filing the appeal and, therefore,
appeal was dismissed as not maintainable.


3.     In the ground of appeal taken before us, assessee has stated that the delay was
due to bonafide reason as assessee was under mistaken belief that appeal was to be
filed within 60 days and not 30 days. Therefore, the delay was 26 days in filing the
appeal before ld CIT(A)..
                                               2                            ITA No.4898/Mum/2010



                                                                         Assessment Year: 2006 -07


4.     Considering the facts of the case and reasons stated by the assessee, we are
satisfied that the delay in filing of appeal before ld CIT(A) was due to a reasonable
cause. Therefore, in the interest of justice, we condone the delay in filing the appeal
before ld CIT(A) and restore the appeal to his file with a direction to decide the appeal
on merits after giving due opportunity of hearing to both parties and considering such
evidences as may be placed before him.


5.     In the result, appeal filed by assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.


       Pronounced in the court on       15th       June, 2012



             (N.K.BILLAIYA)                                      (B.R. MITTAL)
           Accountant Member                                    Judicial Member

Mumbai, Dated        June, 2012
Parida
Copy to:
1. The appellant
2. The respondent
3. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals),21, Mumbai
4. Commissioner of Income Tax, MC-X , Mumbai
5. Departmental Representative, Bench `I' Mumbai

//TRUE COPY//                                                   BY ORDER


                                               ASSTT. REGISTRAR, ITAT, MUMBAI
 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Website Ranking Website Ranking Company Website Positioning Alexa Ranking Website Promotion Website top 10 ranking website top 10 promotion search engine result promotion Strategic Internet Marketing Website Optimization Website Ranking Factors

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions