Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link: https://ims.go2customer.com
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft info@binarysoft.com
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: TDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: VAT RATES :: form 3cd :: empanelment :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: cpt :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: due date for vat payment :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: VAT Audit :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: list of goods taxed at 4%
 
 
From the Courts »
 CIT vs. ITD CEM India JV (Bombay High Court)
 Rajasthan Tax Consultants Association vs. UOI (Rajasthan High Court)
  H.T. MEDIA LIMITED Vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV, NEW DELHI
 Commissioner Of Income Tax (Ltu), New Delhi Vs. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.
 Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)-2 Vs. Index Securities Private Limited
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Benches, Ahmedabad Constitution For The Period From 18/09/2017 To 22/09/2017
  M/s Brothers & Sisters Enterprise vs. JCIT (ITAT Kolkata)
  Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi-Iv Vs. DLF Universal Ltd.
 Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi-Iv Vs. DLF Universal Ltd.
 Jcb India Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax &
 Saheb Ram Om Prakash Marketing Pvt Ltd Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax & ORS

Shri Sasnjay Kumar,L/H of Late Sh.Dharam Singh Kamboj, 1842, Sector 17, HUDA,Jagadhri.V ITO, W-1,Yamuna Nagar
June, 04th 2012
          IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
            CHANDIGARH BENCH `A' CHANDIGARH

       BEFORE SHRI H.L.KARWA, VICE PRESIDENT
     AND SHRI MEHAR SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

                    MA No. 39/CHD/2012
                  In ITA No. 516/CHD/2011
                 Assessment Year: 2006-07

Shri Sasnjay Kumar,                 V        ITO, W-1,
L/H of Late Sh.Dharam Singh Kamboj,          Yamuna Nagar
1842, Sector 17, HUDA,
Jagadhri.

     (Appellant)                             (Respondent)

            Appellant by :  S/Manohar Lal& Mahesh Kumar
            Respondent by : Shri N.K.Saini

            Date of Hearing : 01.06.2012
            Date of Pronouncement : 01.06.2012


                             ORDER

PER MEHAR SINGH, AM

     The assessee filed this Misc.Application under Rule 24

of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Rules, 1963, arising out

of ITA No.516/Chd/2011.


2.   The assessee in the Misc.Application dated 21.02.2012

contended that the appeal in the case was disposed off by the

Bench, for non-prosecution, vide its order dated 17.10.2011.

It was, further, stated in that application that no notice of

hearing for 17.10.2011 was received by the appellant or any

of its legal heirs.   An affidavit to this effect has been filed.

The relevant part of the affidavit is reproduced hereunder:





     "I, Sanjay Kumar aged 45 years, legal heir of Late Shri
     DharamSingh    Kamboj,R/o    1842,Sector   17,  HUDA,
     Jagadhri (Haryana) do hereby solemnly affirm & declare:

     1.     That I am legal heir of late Shri Dharam Singh
            Kamboj in whose case the appeal for the A.Y. 2006-
                                       2




              07 was dismissed by the Hon'ble Chandigarh
              Bench of ITAT as per order dated 17.10.2011 in
              appeal No.516/Chd/2011 for non-prosecution of the
              appeal.

       2.     That neither I nor any other legal heir of late Shri
              Dharam Singh Kamboj nor any employee or f amily
              members of the legal heirs received the notice for
              hearing for the aforesaid appeal as f ixed on
              17.10.2011.

                                                 Sd/-
                                            ( Deponent)
                                          (Sanjay Kumar)
3.     The assessee further placed reliance on the decision of

the    Hon'ble        Supreme       Court   in    the   case   of    CIT     V

S,.Chenniappa Mudaliar (1969) 74 ITR 41 (S.C) and another

decision of jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT V

Gheru Lal Bal Chand (2004) 269 ITR 386 (P&H).                      In view of

this, ld. 'AR' contended, that to meet the ends of justice, the

Misc.Application deserves to be accepted and consequently,

the assessee requested for recall of the impugned order,

passed by the Bench.


4.     Ld.    'DR',    did   not    seriously    contested   the    issue    in

question.


5.     We have carefully perused the contention raised by the

ld. 'AR'. In this case, the assessee filed application dated

31.07.2011, requesting for adjournment of the case.                         The

case    was    adjourned       to    17.10.2011.        However,     on     the

appointed date, no-one attended nor any application for

adjournment was received from the assessee.


6.     Having regard to the decisions relied upon by the ld.

'AR', as also to meet the essential requirement of substantive

justice, we are of the considered opinion, that the impugned
                              3




M.A, filed by the assessee, deserves to be allowed.    In this

context, it is pertinent to mention here that substantive

justice must prevail over technicalities.    Therefore, having

regard to the submissions made by the assessee and, further,

to meet the ends of justice, Misc.Application filed by the

assessee is allowed.





7.   In the result, Misc. Application, filed by the assessee is

allowed. Registry is directed to fix the case on 28.08.2012.


 Order pronounced in the Open Court on 1 s t June,2012.

           Sd/-                             Sd/-

   (H.L.KARWA)                         (MEHAR SINGH)
 VICE PRESIDENT                      ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Dated: 1 s t June,2012.
`Poonam'
Copy to:

     The Appellant, The Respondent, The CIT(A), The CIT,DR


                                    Assistant Registrar, ITAT
                                           Chandigarh
 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Article Management Solutions System Article Management Software S

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions