Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
 Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
 Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
 ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
 Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
 [Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court
 Rajasthan High Court directs GST Authority to Unblock Input Tax Credit availed in Electronic Credit Ledger
 Sebi-taxman fight over service tax dues reaches Supreme Court
 Delhi High Court Seeks Status Report from Centre for Appointments of Chairperson & Members in Adjudicating Authority Under PMLA
 Delhi High Court allows Income Tax Exemption to Charitable Society running Printing Press and uses Profit so generated for Charitable Purposes
 ITAT accepts Lease Income as Business Income as Business Investments were mostly in nature of Properties

Shiv Vanijay Capsec Pvt. Ltd.,IV/928, Chhotta Chippiwara,Chawri Bazar,Delhi 110006 vs. ITO, Ward 8(2), New Delhi
June, 13th 2012
                                                                ITA NO. 4709/DEL/2010


                   IN THE INCOME TAX APPELATE TRIBUNAL

                        DELHI BENCH "G": NEW DELHI

             BEFORE SHRI R.P. TOLANI, JUDICIAL MEMBER &
              SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

                             ITA No. 4709/Del/2010
                                 A.Y. : 2002-03

Shiv Vanijay Capsec Pvt. Ltd.,          vs.   ITO, Ward 8(2), New Delhi
IV/928, Chhotta Chippiwara,
Chawri Bazar,
Delhi ­ 110006
 (PAN : AABCS2773E)
(Appellant)                                   (Respondent)

      Assessee by        :       None
      Department by      :       Sh. S.K. Upadhyaya, Sr. D.R.
                                 ORDER
PER SHAMIM YAHYA: AM



      The assessee has filed this       appeal against the order dated 10.8.2010

passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-XI, New Delhi.

2.    This case was listed for hearing before the Tribunal on 11-6-2012 and

for this assessee was informed. Today i.e. on 11-6-2012 when the case was

called on board, none appeared on behalf of the assessee nor any request for

adjournment has been filed before the Tribunal despite the service of notice

upon the assessee. It seems that the assessee is not interested in prosecuting

her appeal; hence, the appeal filed by the assessee is liable to be dismissed, for

non-prosecution.    In our above view, we find support from the following

decisions:







                                          1
                                                               ITA NO. 4709/DEL/2010


1. In the case of CIT vs. B.N. Bhattachargee and another, reported in 118

   ITR 461 [relevant pages 477 & 478] wherein their Lordships have held

   that:

       "The appeal does not mean merely filing of the appeal but
       effectively pursuing it."


2. In the case of Estate of late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT; 223 ITR 480 (M.P.)

   while dismissing the reference made at the instance of the assessee in

   default made following observation in their order:

           "If the party, at whose instance the reference is made, fails to
           appear at the hearing, or fails in taking steps for preparation of
           the paper books so as to enable hearing of the reference, the
           court is not bound to answer the reference."

3. In the case of Commissioner of Income-tax vs. Multiplan India (P) Ltd.;

   38 ITD 320 (Del), the appeal filed by the revenue before the Tribunal,

   which was fixed for hearing.            But on the date of hearing nobody

   represented     the   revenue/appellant      nor   any   communication       for

   adjournment was received. There was no communication or information

   as to why the revenue chose to remain absent on that date. The Tribunal

   on the basis of inherent powers, treated the appeal filed by the revenue

   as un-admitted in view of the provisions of Rule 19 of the Appellate

   Tribunal Rules, 1963.









                                       2
                                                                ITA NO. 4709/DEL/2010


3.     The assessee, if so desired, shall be free to move this Tribunal praying for

recalling this order and explaining reasons for non-compliance etc. then this

order may be recalled.

4.     In the result,   the appeal filed by the assessee, is dismissed, for non-

prosecution.

        Order pronounced in the open court on 11/6/2012, upon conclusion of
hearing.

       Sd/-                                                  Sd/-
 [R.P. TOLANI]                                          [SHAMIM YAHYA]
JUDICIAL MEMBER                                      ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

Date: 11/6/2012

SRBhatnagar

Copy forwarded to: -
1.     Appellant          2.    Respondent     3.   CIT   4.    CIT (A)
5.     DR, ITAT
                                TRUE COPY

                                                          By Order,

                                        Assistant Registrar, ITAT, Delhi Benches




                                         3
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting