Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Karnataka High Court restrains Bengaluru-based Institute of Chartered Tax Practitioners India from enrolling candidates for its courses
 Attachment on Cash Credit of Assessee under GST Act: Delhi HC directs Bank to Comply Instructions to Vacate
 Income Tax Addition Made Towards Unsubstantiated Share Capital Is Eligible For Section 80-IC Deduction: Delhi High Court
 Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
 Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
 Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
 ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
 Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
 [Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court
 Rajasthan High Court directs GST Authority to Unblock Input Tax Credit availed in Electronic Credit Ledger
 Sebi-taxman fight over service tax dues reaches Supreme Court

Sanjeev N Thakur A/401 Sunderram Bldg Apna Ghar Lokhandwala, Andheri (W) Mumbai 53 Vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 24(2)(2), Mumbai
June, 06th 2012
                      IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                               MUMBAI ` E ` BENCH
                            MUMBAI BENCHES, MUMBAI

          BEFORE SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JM & SHRI RAJENDRA, AM

                              ITA No. 5381/Mum/2011
                             (Assessment Year 2005-06 )

Sanjeev N Thakur                         Vs     The Income Tax Officer
A/401 Sunderram Bldg                            Ward 24(2)(2), Mumbai
Apna Ghar
Lokhandwala, Andheri (W)
Mumbai 53
             (Appellant )                                   (Respondent)


                          PAN No.             AADPT2458A
                  Assessee by                 None
                  Revenue by                   Shri Abani Kant Nayak
                  Dt.of hearing               4TH June 2012
                  Dt of pronouncement          4th June 2012


                                     ORDER
PER RAJENDRA, AM




      This appeal by the assessee is directed against the penalty order passed u/s

271(1)( c) dated 10.6.2011 of the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) for the

Assessment Year 2005-06.

2     In this case, the date of hearing on 4th June 2012 has already been informed

to both the parties and same has been noted by them in the file. Despite the same,

none appeared on behalf of the assessee.         It appears that the assessee is not

interested in the prosecution of the case. We find that the ratio emanating from the

decision rendered by Hon'ble Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Late

Tukojirao Holkar Vs. Commissioner of Wealth Tax 223 ITR 480 and the Tribunal decision

in CIT Vs. Multiplan India Limited 38 ITD 320 is that the appeal can be dismissed for
                                            2





                                                                           Sanjeev N Thakur


non-prosecution. Hence, following the precedent, we dismiss this appeal for non-

prosecution in limine.


3      However, if the assessee through proper application can satisfy the Tribunal

for such non appearance on the date of hearing, the Tribunal may at its discretion

recall this order.

4          In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed.

Order pronounced in the open court at the time of hearing i.e. on 4th June 2012



                     Sd/                                          Sd/-


            ( VIJAY PAL RAO )                                ( RAJENDRA )
             Judicial Member                              Accountant Member

Place: Mumbai : Dated: 4th, June 2012

Raj*
Copy forwarded to:

1      Appellant
2      Respondent
3      CIT
4      CIT(A)
5      DR


                                       /TRUE COPY/
                                         BY ORDER




                                   Dy /AR, ITAT, Mumbai





Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2025 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting