Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: VAT RATES :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: empanelment :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: form 3cd :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: TDS :: due date for vat payment :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: VAT Audit :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: cpt
 
 
From the Courts »
 Reliance Communications Ltd vs. DDIT (ITAT Mumbai)
  Sushila Devi vs. CIT (Delhi High Court)
 Ashok Prapann Sharma vs. CIT (Supreme Court)a
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
 M.K.Overseas Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Pr.Commissioner Of Income Tax-06
 Arshia Ahmed Qureshi Vs. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-21
 CHAUDHARY SKIN TRADING COMPANY Vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-21
  Sushila Devi vs. CIT (Delhi High Court)
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
 Deputy Director Of Income Tax Vs. Virage Logic International

M/s Castrol India Limited,Technopolis Knowledge Park,Mahakali Caves Road,Chakala, Andheri (East)Mumbai 400093. Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Range 8(3),Aayakar Bhavan,M.K. Road,Mumbai 400 020.
June, 14th 2012
           IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                MUMBAI BENCHES " C ", MUMBAI

          BEFORE SHRI DINESH KUMAR AGARWAL, JM
                 AND SHRI RAJENDRA, A.M.

                     ITA No. : 8191/Mum/2010
                     Assessment Year : 2005-06

M/s Castrol India Limited,                     Dy. Commissioner of Income
Technopolis Knowledge Park,                    Tax, Range 8(3),
Mahakali Caves Road,                           Aayakar Bhavan,
Chakala, Andheri (East)              Vs.       M.K. Road,
Mumbai ­ 400093.                               Mumbai ­ 400 020.
PAN NO: AAACC4481E
          (Appellant)                                  (Respondent)

                     Appellant by          :    None
                   Respondent by           :    Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

                   Date of hearing         :    12-6-2012
           Date of Pronouncement           :    12-6-2012


                              ORDER


PER DINESH KUMAR AGARWAL, JM :


     This appeal preferred by the assessee is directed against the

order dated 27-09-2010 passed by the ld. CIT(A)- 15, Mumbai for the

assessment year 2005-06.





2.   In this case, the notice of date of hearing fixing the appeal for

12-6-2012 sent to the assessee by RPAD was duly received by the

assessee as per AD Card available on record. However, at the time of

hearing, none was present on behalf of the assessee nor filed any
                                    2
                                                 ITA No : 8191/Mum/2010


application for adjournment of the case. It appears that the assessee is

not interested in pursuing the appeal. It has been held by the Hon'ble

Supreme Court in the case of B.N. Bhattachargee and Anr. (118 ITR

461) (at pages 477/478) that appeal does not mean only filing of memo

of appeal but also pursuing it effectively. In cases where the assessee

does not want to pursue the appeal, Court/Tribunal have inherent

power to dismiss the appeal for non-prosecution as held by the Hon'ble

Bombay High Court in the case of M/s. Chemipol vs. Union of India in

Excise Appeal No. 62 of 2009. We are convinced that the assessee is

not interested in prosecuting the appeal. We, therefore, dismiss the

appeal of the assessee as unadmitted.


3.    The assessee shall, however, be at liberty to approach the

Tribunal for recalling of this order, if prevented by sufficient cause for

non-appearance on the date of hearing.





4.    In the result, the assessee's appeal stands dismissed.


      Order pronounced in the open court on 12th day of June, 2012.



                Sd/-                                  Sd/-

         ( RAJENDRA )                    ( DINESH KUMAR AGARWAL )
     ACCOUNTANT MEMBER                        JUDICIAL MEMBER

Mumbai, Dt: 12.06.2012.
                                  3
                                              ITA No : 8191/Mum/2010



Copy   forwarded to :
  1.    The Appellant,
  2.    The Respondent,
  3.    The C.I.T.
  4.    CIT (A)
  5.    The DR,     - Bench, ITAT, Mumbai

                  //True Copy//
                                                 BY ORDER



                                          ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
                                      ITAT, Mumbai Benches, Mumbai
RK
 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Custom Software Development Outsourcing Custom Software Development Offshore Cus

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions