Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
Popular Search: VAT RATES :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: due date for vat payment :: empanelment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: form 3cd :: cpt :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: VAT Audit :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: TDS
From the Courts »
 The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 Vs. Inter Globe Technology Quotient Pvt. Ltd.
 Akum Drugs And Pharmaceuticals Limited Through: Director Shri. Sanjeev Jain Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(1) & Anr.
 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-2 New Delhi Vs. Meeta Gutgutia Prop. M/s Ferns „n? Petals
 Prabhatam Investment Pvt. Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
 CIT vs. Laxman Industrial Resources Pvt.Ltd (Delhi High Court)
  State Of Jharkhand vs. Lalu Prasad Yadav (Supreme Court)
 CIT vs. Krishan K. Aggarwal (Supreme Court)
 Ambuja Cements Ltd. Vs. Commissioner, Service Tax Commissionerate, Delhi
 Director Of Income Tax (Exemptions) Vs. Vishwa Hindu Parishad
 ITAT Proposes Important Changes To Tribunal Rules
 Meherjee Cassinath Holdings Pvt. Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)

M/s Castrol India Limited,Technopolis Knowledge Park,Mahakali Caves Road,Chakala, Andheri (East)Mumbai 400093. Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Range 8(3),Aayakar Bhavan,M.K. Road,Mumbai 400 020.
June, 14th 2012
                MUMBAI BENCHES " C ", MUMBAI

                 AND SHRI RAJENDRA, A.M.

                     ITA No. : 8191/Mum/2010
                     Assessment Year : 2005-06

M/s Castrol India Limited,                     Dy. Commissioner of Income
Technopolis Knowledge Park,                    Tax, Range 8(3),
Mahakali Caves Road,                           Aayakar Bhavan,
Chakala, Andheri (East)              Vs.       M.K. Road,
Mumbai ­ 400093.                               Mumbai ­ 400 020.
          (Appellant)                                  (Respondent)

                     Appellant by          :    None
                   Respondent by           :    Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

                   Date of hearing         :    12-6-2012
           Date of Pronouncement           :    12-6-2012



     This appeal preferred by the assessee is directed against the

order dated 27-09-2010 passed by the ld. CIT(A)- 15, Mumbai for the

assessment year 2005-06.

2.   In this case, the notice of date of hearing fixing the appeal for

12-6-2012 sent to the assessee by RPAD was duly received by the

assessee as per AD Card available on record. However, at the time of

hearing, none was present on behalf of the assessee nor filed any
                                                 ITA No : 8191/Mum/2010

application for adjournment of the case. It appears that the assessee is

not interested in pursuing the appeal. It has been held by the Hon'ble

Supreme Court in the case of B.N. Bhattachargee and Anr. (118 ITR

461) (at pages 477/478) that appeal does not mean only filing of memo

of appeal but also pursuing it effectively. In cases where the assessee

does not want to pursue the appeal, Court/Tribunal have inherent

power to dismiss the appeal for non-prosecution as held by the Hon'ble

Bombay High Court in the case of M/s. Chemipol vs. Union of India in

Excise Appeal No. 62 of 2009. We are convinced that the assessee is

not interested in prosecuting the appeal. We, therefore, dismiss the

appeal of the assessee as unadmitted.

3.    The assessee shall, however, be at liberty to approach the

Tribunal for recalling of this order, if prevented by sufficient cause for

non-appearance on the date of hearing.

4.    In the result, the assessee's appeal stands dismissed.

      Order pronounced in the open court on 12th day of June, 2012.

                Sd/-                                  Sd/-

         ( RAJENDRA )                    ( DINESH KUMAR AGARWAL )
     ACCOUNTANT MEMBER                        JUDICIAL MEMBER

Mumbai, Dt: 12.06.2012.
                                              ITA No : 8191/Mum/2010

Copy   forwarded to :
  1.    The Appellant,
  2.    The Respondent,
  3.    The C.I.T.
  4.    CIT (A)
  5.    The DR,     - Bench, ITAT, Mumbai

                  //True Copy//
                                                 BY ORDER

                                          ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
                                      ITAT, Mumbai Benches, Mumbai
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Custom Software Development Outsourcing Custom Software Development Offshore Cus

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions