Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link: https://ims.go2customer.com
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft info@binarysoft.com
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: empanelment :: form 3cd :: TDS :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: cpt :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: VAT RATES :: due date for vat payment :: VAT Audit
 
 
From the Courts »
 CIT vs. ITD CEM India JV (Bombay High Court)
 Rajasthan Tax Consultants Association vs. UOI (Rajasthan High Court)
  H.T. MEDIA LIMITED Vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV, NEW DELHI
 Commissioner Of Income Tax (Ltu), New Delhi Vs. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.
 Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)-2 Vs. Index Securities Private Limited
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Benches, Ahmedabad Constitution For The Period From 18/09/2017 To 22/09/2017
  M/s Brothers & Sisters Enterprise vs. JCIT (ITAT Kolkata)
  Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi-Iv Vs. DLF Universal Ltd.
 Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi-Iv Vs. DLF Universal Ltd.
 Jcb India Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax &
 Saheb Ram Om Prakash Marketing Pvt Ltd Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax & ORS

Jiny Textiles Pvt Ltd.,9A/104, Neelam Nagar Phase-II,Prataprao Gujjr Marg,Mulund(E), Mumbai-81 Vs. Income Tax Officer 10(2)(4),Mumbai
June, 18th 2012
                      IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,
                              MUMBAI BENCH I' BENCH

              BEFORE SHRI B.R.MITTAL(JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND
                 SHRI N.K.BILLAIYA (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER)

                               ITA No.4898/Mum/2010
                             Assessment Year: 2006 -07

Jiny Textiles Pvt Ltd.,                     Income Tax Officer 10(2)(4),
9A/104, Neelam Nagar Phase-II,              Mumbai
Prataprao Gujjr Marg,
Mulund(E), Mumbai-81                 Vs.
PA No .AABCJ 4226 B

(Appellant)                                 (Respondent)


                            Appellant by : None
                            Respondent by: Shri Parthasarthi Naik

Date of hearing:             7.6.2012
Date of pronouncement:        15. 6.2012

                                   ORDER

Per B.R.Mittal, JM:

       The assessee has filed this appeal for assessment year 2006-07 against order
dated 29.3.2010 of ld CIT(A)-21, Mumbai.


2.     We observe that ld CIT(A) has dismissed the appeal of assessee, which was
barred by limitation. Ld CIT(A) has stated that assessee has not requested condonation
of delay nor any explanation was filed for delay in filing the appeal and, therefore,
appeal was dismissed as not maintainable.


3.     In the ground of appeal taken before us, assessee has stated that the delay was
due to bonafide reason as assessee was under mistaken belief that appeal was to be
filed within 60 days and not 30 days. Therefore, the delay was 26 days in filing the
appeal before ld CIT(A)..
                                               2                            ITA No.4898/Mum/2010
                                                                         Assessment Year: 2006 -07


4.     Considering the facts of the case and reasons stated by the assessee, we are
satisfied that the delay in filing of appeal before ld CIT(A) was due to a reasonable
cause. Therefore, in the interest of justice, we condone the delay in filing the appeal
before ld CIT(A) and restore the appeal to his file with a direction to decide the appeal
on merits after giving due opportunity of hearing to both parties and considering such
evidences as may be placed before him.


5.     In the result, appeal filed by assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.


       Pronounced in the court on       15th       June, 2012



             (N.K.BILLAIYA)                                      (B.R. MITTAL)
           Accountant Member                                    Judicial Member

Mumbai, Dated        June, 2012
Parida
Copy to:
1. The appellant
2. The respondent
3. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals),21, Mumbai
4. Commissioner of Income Tax, MC-X , Mumbai
5. Departmental Representative, Bench `I' Mumbai

//TRUE COPY//                                                   BY ORDER


                                               ASSTT. REGISTRAR, ITAT, MUMBAI
 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Website Ranking Website Ranking Company Website Positioning Alexa Ranking Website Promotion Website top 10 ranking website top 10 promotion search engine result promotion Strategic Internet Marketing Website Optimization Website Ranking Factors

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions