Brij Bhushan Bansal,R-11/191, Raj Nagar,Ghaziabad. Vs. ITO, Ward 1(1),Meerut.
June, 21st 2012
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
(DELHI BENCH `A' : NEW DELHI)
BEFORE SHRI U.B.S. BEDI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND
SHRI A.N. PAHUJA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
(Assessment Year : 2006-07)
Brij Bhushan Bansal, Vs. ITO, Ward 1(1),
R-11/191, Raj Nagar, Meerut.
Assessee by : None
Revenue by : Shri Alok Singh Sr.DR
PER U.B.S. BEDI, J.M.
This appeal of the Revenue emanates from the order passed by the CIT (A),
Meerut, dated 08.09.2011, relevant to assessment year 2006-07.
2. Despite having noted the adjourned date on last date of hearing by the Ld.AR of
the assessee, assessee did not appear at the time when the case was called up nor any
adjournment request is received. Thus, it is inferred that the assessee is not interested in
prosecution of the present appeal.
3. Having regard to Rule 19(2) of ITAT Rules, 1963 and following various decisions
of the Tribunal including in the case of CIT vs. Multiplan India (P) Ltd., reported in 38
ITD 320 (Del.) and the judgment of Hon'ble Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of
Estate of late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT, 223 I.T.R. 480 (MP), we treat the appeal of the
assessee as unadmitted and dismiss the same.
2 I.T.A. No.5710/Del./2011
(A.Y. : 2006-07)
4. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order pronounced in open court soon after the conclusion of the hearing on
(A.N. PAHUJA) (U.B.S. BEDI)
ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER
Dated : June 19, 2012
Copy of the order forwarded to:-
4. CIT(A), Meerut.
5. CIT(ITAT) Deputy Registrar, ITAT