sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Latest Expert Exchange
News Headlines »
 What to do when you receive a notice from the tax department
 How to use your Form 16
 Which ITR form applies to you for financial year 2017-18?
 Income tax returns filing form-2 released; should you use it? Find out
  Are you planning to file ITR 1 form? here's how to do it Income Tax Return (ITR) filing
 30 LPA-Opening Financial Controller
 ITR form 2 in java release by CBDT for return filing by individuals
 How to file your income tax return using ITR Form-1 Income Tax efiling for AY 2018-19
 Income tax returns (ITR) filing: Have you received I-T dept notice? Safeguard yourself; here is how
 Delayed release of electronic ITR forms may compel CBDT to extend the filing deadline
 Trading volume linked to tax return?

Satyam scam: Price Waterhouse seeks ruling on SEBI's jurisdiction over auditors
June, 15th 2010

The Securities and Exchange Board of India may have to establish its regulatory jurisdiction over audit firms before pronouncing its verdict on the case relating to Price Waterhouse's role in the multi-crore Satyam fraud.

This is because Price Waterhouse, which is being probed by SEBI, is understood to have sought a ruling on the regulator's jurisdiction over auditors, before going to the merit of the case. It is learnt that the audit firm, which has been charged with overlooking manipulations of Satyam accounts, has questioned SEBI's jurisdiction on the ground that audit firms are not market intermediaries regulated by it. Audit firms are registered with the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and are accountable to it for any professional misconduct.

During the hearing last week, counsel of Price Waterhouse urged that the case may be dropped for want of jurisdiction. SEBI is understood to be of the view that it has the jurisdiction to take action against Price Waterhouse, if it is found guilty, as actions of auditors directly or indirectly impact the stock market. SEBI had issued a show-cause notice to auditors of Satyam last year under the Fraudulent and Unfair Practices Regulations. Partners of the Hyderabad arm of the audit firm were allegedly involved in falsification of accounts of Satyam Computers, renamed Mahindra Satyam after the company was taken over by Tech Mahindra.

Earlier, SEBI had rejected Price Waterhouse's application for consent settlement. According to legal experts, if SEBI comes out with a ruling on its regulatory jurisdiction over auditors, it could be immediately challenged by the audit firm. This would further delay the case.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Contact Us

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions