Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
Popular Search: form 3cd :: due date for vat payment :: empanelment :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: VAT Audit :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: VAT RATES :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: cpt :: TDS
Direct Tax »
 Salaried taxpayers to get SMS alerts for TDS deductions
 Salaried tax payers to get SMS alerts on TDS deductions
 Mumbai zone direct tax collection flat in H1 FY17
 CBDT issues final rules for taxing share buy back by companies
 CBDT issues final rules for taxing share-buyback
 The direct tax collections up to September, 2016 are at Rs. 3.27 lakh crore which is 8.95% more than the net collections for the corresponding period last year.
 IDS is tremendous success: CBDT chief Rani Singh Nair
 Submit monthly data of appeals disposed of: CBDT to officers
 Direct tax mop-up jumps 9 per cent in H1, indirect tax up 26 per cent
 Income tax department slams notice on five Mumbai-based exporters over offshore accounts
 Redress TDS mismatch grievance of taxpayers: CBDT

Reknitting the MAT: One step back
June, 15th 2010

The finance ministry is set to drop a key proposal in the direct taxes code (DTC) to change the way companies work out their minimum alternate tax (MAT), helping them save crores of rupees in taxes.

The decision should not come as a surprise to industry. It opposed the new formula to charge MAT on gross assets of companies and not book profits, saying the move will hurt capital-intensive and loss-making companies. The government agreed for a review and will disclose its stand in the revised discussion paper on the code.

MAT is charged on companies that do not pay income tax because of exemptions. These companies enjoy more exemptions than their counterparts who pay corporate tax.

The draft code proposed a 2% MAT on gross assets of companies to garner more revenues. The idea was to levy MAT on presumptive income, encourage companies to use assets better and curb tax evasion. The new approach also meant discouraging companies from going on an asset creation binge.

A related proposal in the draft code was to scrap the facility that allows companies to carry forward MAT credit and set it off against their normal tax liability for 10 years. Today, MAT is like an advance tax paid by companies to the government that needs money to meet expenditure commitments. MAT will be the final tax, if the credit facility goes.

On the flip side, MAT on gross assets will hurt companies with a large asset base and relatively small earnings, besides loss-making companies.

One option is to exempt loss-making and capital-intensive infrastructure companies from MAT. However, selective exemptions will only distort the tax structure and defeat the goal of ushering in a neat tax system. The government should resist such pressures if it wants to end tax holidays.

The revised discussion paper on the code is likely to propose continuing with the current method of computing MAT. This means companies will pay MAT on book profits. That is only one side of the story. The devil, as they say, could be in the details. India Inc will have to look at the fine print before rushing to raise a toast.

For the government, dropping the codes formula will mean foregoing extra revenues of Rs 15,000-20,000 crore. This is not small change. It could, therefore, attach riders on MAT to garner revenues and end exemptions.

The intention of MAT, introduced a decade and a half ago, was to discourage companies from arranging their tax affairs in a manner that would result in huge book profits and a substantial dividend payout, but no tax liability.
At that time, the rate was fixed at 7.5% of book profits of a company.

It was raised to 10% in 2006-07, and 15% in 2009-10. The MAT rate was raised to 18% in this years Budget that saw a lowering of the corporate surcharge.

These two policy decisions were perhaps an indication of the impending overhaul in the direct taxes regime. What are the options before the government?

It can propose an increase in the MAT rate to bring it closer to the effective corporate tax rate of about 22.8%. Effective tax rate is the average tax rate for companies after exemptions have been claimed. It is lower than the statutory corporate tax rate of 33.99%. Ideally, the two should converge, and this will happen once the exemptions are removed.

A hike in the MAT rate will result in more cash outflow for companies, compelling them to postpone their investments. They may have to reckon with a higher rate as a trade-off for dropping the new formula. If the credit facility goes, two rates will be in force. But this will defeat the goal of a simple tax system. It makes sense to retain MAT credit.

As part of the comprehensive reforms package, the draft code also proposed a cut in the corporate tax rate to 25% from 30%. Is a 5% cut in the corporate tax possible if the new formula is dropped? Here again, the government has to take a call, given the revenue implications.

The country needs to lower its corporate tax rate if it has to compete with China and east Asian economies. This is eminently feasible if the government ends all tax exemptions.

Tax breaks are inefficient and iniquitous, and raise compliance and administrative costs. These giveaways were estimated to cost the government around Rs 80,000 crore last fiscal year. But the benefits arising from these exemptions are difficult to gauge.

Tax breaks were justified when corporate tax rates were very high. Not any more. The panoply of exemptions should be removed, and MAT can be abolished once this is done.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Our Mission

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions