Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: cpt :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: due date for vat payment :: TDS :: VAT Audit :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: form 3cd :: VAT RATES :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: empanelment
 
 
General »
  Clarification regarding applicability of Section 16 (1)(a) of the Companies Act. 2013 with reference to cases under corresponding provisions of Companies Act. 1956 -reg.
 SH. VISHWA NATH GUPTA Vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL, KANPUR AND ANR.
 No tax scrutiny of big transaction if it matches income
 Clarification regarding applicability of Section 16 (1)(a) of the Companies Act. 2013 with reference to cases under corresponding provisions of Companies Act. 1956 -reg.
  Home loan tax reliefs often missed by taxpayers
 Income tax department launches online facility for linking Aadhaar and PAN
 Home loan tax reliefs often missed by taxpayers
 Tax headache in India is a bonanza for global accounting firms
 Activities To Be Treated As Supply Even If Made Without Consideration Under CGST ACT
  Haryana Goods and Services Tax Bill passed
 Maharashtra to focus on rise in non-tax income

PETITIONER WANTS PIL ON ULIP BAN HEARD BY HC
June, 11th 2010

Rajendra Thacker, who has filed a public interest litigation against SEBI's ban on sale of unit-linked insurance plans (ULIP) by insurance companies, urged the Bombay High Court on Thursday that the PIL should not be transferred to the apex court.

In a case listed prior to the PIL, the division bench of acting Chief Justice JN Patel and Justice SC Dharmadhikari heard an application seeking CBI inquiry into a Jharkhand scam and there was no opposition from the Union government, said petitioner's counsel Sumedha Rao.

"Then, why can't our PIL be heard before this court when the regulator as well as the insurance companies are in Mumbai?" she argued.

However, Justice Patel has said "not before me", which means that he will not hear the case himself. However, being the acting Chief Justice, he may assign another judge to hear the petitioner's plea, said Ms Rao.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Achievements

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions