Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« Top Headlines »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 How much gold jewellery can you keep at home? Nagpur ITAT explains rules on ownership, gifts, taxability
 ?5.31 lakh TDS refund allowed by ITAT Delhi: Why absence of an original ITR did not block the taxpayer
 Missed the ITR Filing Deadline? How to Claim Your Income Tax Refund and Correct Mistakes Before December 31, 2026
 GST Return Preparation & ITC Analysis with TallyPrime (Hinglish Session)
 GST Return Preparation & ITC Analysis with TallyPrime (Hinglish Session)
 GST Return Preparation & ITC Analysis with TallyPrime (Hinglish Session)
 Income-Tax Department Moves to Bring Greater Certainty to International Tax Cases
 ITR Defective Notice for AY 2026-27: Reasons, 15-Day Deadline and What Happens If You Ignore It
 ITR Refund Status 2026: How to Track Your Income Tax Refund Online – Step-by-Step Guide
 GST Council Explores Andhra Pradesh’s AI-Driven Tax Administration Model
 ITR filing 2026: Who must file by August 31? Tax department explains

Supreme Court admits excise plea
June, 22nd 2009

The Supreme Court has admitted a couple of petitions filed by the excise department alleging that textile major Raymond Ltd had evaded excise duty of more than Rs 3.62 crore.    

The alleged excise evasion by Raymond relates to the period between June 1997 and June 1998, and July 1998 and December 1999.    

A bench headed by Justice S H Kapadia has admitted the appeals filed by the revenue challenging the sectoral tribunal's ruling that waived interest and penalty imposed by the department.    

The excise department, while holding Raymond guilty of misrepresentation, had issued showcause notice as to why the company should not pay duty of more than Rs 3.62 crore.    

The petition said that the deduction of 5.84 per cent sought for on account of post-removal expenses in the price list (commission to agents, bank charges and freight and insurance charges) had no relation with the discount claimed from the assessable value.    

According to the excise department, the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal was not justified in allowing the company's application for rectifying the mistake without considering the evidence on record.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2026 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting