sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Latest Expert Exchange
From the Courts »
 PCIT vs. Hardik Bharat Patel (Bombay High Court)
 PCIT vs. NDR Promoters Pvt. Ltd (Delhi High Court)
 Utech Developers Ltd. 305, 3rd Floor Bhanot Corner Pamposh Enclave, G.K.-I New Delhi 110 048 vs. ITO, Ward 18(1) New Delhi
 DCIT, Circle 5(1) Room No.390 C.R.building I.P.Estate New Delhi vs. BSES Yamuna Power Ltd. Shakti Kiran building Karkardoma Delhi 110 092
 DCIT, Circle 8(1) Room No.415 4th floor C.R.building I.P.Estate New Delhi 110 002 vs. Engineers India Ltd. Engineers India Bhawan 1, Bhikaji Cama Place R.K.Puram
 Sh. Gulashanobar, Sanjay Parashar, Adv., 47-A, Devika Chamber, Raj Nagar, District Centre, Ghaziabad vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2), Ghaziabad
 The DCIT, Central Circle-31, Room No.319, E-2, ARA Centre, Jhandewalan Extn. New Delhi. vs. M/s. Sutlej Agro Products Ltd., 30, Community Centre, Saket, New Delhi.
 The JCIT (TDS), 13-A, Subhash Road, Dehradun. vs. Uttaranchal Health & Family Welfare Society, SCOVA (NRHM), Sahastradhara Road, Near I.T. Park, Dehradun.
 Jindal Stainless Ltd. O.P. Jindal Marg Hisar vs. DCIT, Circle 13
 Bharat Vikas Parishad Maharana Pratap Nyas, Flat No.157, Hewo Apartments, Sector-15, Part-II, Gurgaon, Haryana. vs. The CIT (Exemptions) (Hq.), Chandigarh.
 Shri Ankit Kapoor, B-102, RG City Centre, Plot No.4, Motia Khan, Paharganj, New Delhi. vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-63(4), E-2 Block, Civic Centre, New Delhi.

ITAT members banned
June, 26th 2009

The ministry of law and justice has banned retired members of Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), a quasi judicial body on tax matters, from appearing before the tribunal, post-retirement.

Senior income-tax officials and tax professionals welcomed the move, as it puts an end to a practice that often creates embarrassing situations during the hearing of tax cases. Quite often, lawyers and chartered accountants had to put up with situations in which a member who presided over the hearing of a case, reappears at the same forum after retirement to defend one of the parties in the same case.

The law ministry has also banned presidents and senior vice-presidents of ITAT, from appearing before the Tribunal.
YP Trivedi, senior tax lawyer and member of Parliament welcomed the ministry's decision of banning such practices. "Creation of such protocol would lead to better judicial discipline and enhancement of the prestige of the institution of ITAT," he said.

The issue first came up when members of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) were banned from practising before CESTAT, after retirement, by a provision introduced in the Customs and Excise Act, in the 2007 Budget.

Critics of the proposal questioned the practice of ITAT members appearing before the Tribunal after retirement.
Four retired CESTAT members had challenged the provision in the Customs and Excise Act before the Delhi High Court.

While dismissing the petition, the court, in its April 2009 order, had observed that the "...court's authority is based on public perception especially that of the litigants appearing before it, that the process of administration of justice is far removed, from even the remotest possibility of bias creeping into the decision making process."

Senior income-tax officials said the practice of officers belonging to the elite Indian Revenue Service cadre appearing before the Tribunal after retirement too, should be banned. There were instances where the officer who presided over the assessment of tax payer, appeared, after his retirement, on behalf of the tax payer.

YP Trivedi, senior tax lawyer and member of Parliament welcomed the ministrys decision of banning such practices. "Creation of such protocol would lead to better judicial discipline and enhancement of the prestige of the institution of ITAT."

"This change will curb the prevailing tendency of some individuals becoming members in the Tribunal with a view to resign later and take the advantage of the context made earlier, while on the bench," says Dinesh Vyas, senior tax counsel.

But K Shivram, vice president of ITAT Bar Association said: "The experience and knowledge of a judge is an asset to the nation's delivery is important to retain knowledge and experience of the judiciary to deliver speedy justice."

According to Mr Shivaram, the age limit of the Supreme Court and High Court judges should be raised to 68 years and 65 years, from 65 years and 62 years, respectively.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2019 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
SEO Services SEO LLC e-boost Search Engine Optimization Services Internet Marketing Services Website Placement Services On-site Webs

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions